Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

175 descriptor set optimizations batch inserts #209

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024

Conversation

ifadams
Copy link
Contributor

@ifadams ifadams commented Aug 15, 2024

Initial development done, still some refinement and test updates to be done, but ready for initial review.

src/QueryHandlerPMGD.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/DescriptorsCommand.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/DescriptorsCommand.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Target CPP Coverage: 64.3906%
Source CPP Coverage: 64.0043%

Target Python Coverage: 98.02%
Source Python Coverage: 98.02%

@ifadams
Copy link
Contributor Author

ifadams commented Aug 16, 2024

@rolandoquesada Question for you: I'm assuming our "end to end" tests from python do not really exercise coverage outside of the client because they are running against the server?

Copy link

Target CPP Coverage: 64.3906%
Source CPP Coverage: 64.0032%

Target Python Coverage: 98.02%
Source Python Coverage: 98.02%

Copy link

Target CPP Coverage: 64.3906%
Source CPP Coverage: 63.9842%

Target Python Coverage: 98.02%
Source Python Coverage: 98.02%

Copy link

Target CPP Coverage: 64.3906%
Source CPP Coverage: 63.9842%

Target Python Coverage: 98.02%
Source Python Coverage: 98.02%

@ifadams
Copy link
Contributor Author

ifadams commented Aug 27, 2024

Alright folks, I think this is ready for a merge, however we have some nits around code coverage.

@ifadams
Copy link
Contributor Author

ifadams commented Aug 29, 2024

@araghuna1 @s-gobriel any final updates/review comments?

araghuna1
araghuna1 previously approved these changes Aug 29, 2024
@s-gobriel
Copy link
Contributor

Very good work @ifadams on the batch inserts. I wonder if you think it is valuable to add a couple of c++ unit tests (in addition to the python tests you included for end-to-end to testing). These unittests can target the functionality to add in batches using the different engines and retrieve and check that the values are correct. but otherwise, I think this is good.

@ifadams
Copy link
Contributor Author

ifadams commented Aug 29, 2024

Very good work @ifadams on the batch inserts. I wonder if you think it is valuable to add a couple of c++ unit tests (in addition to the python tests you included for end-to-end to testing). These unittests can target the functionality to add in batches using the different engines and retrieve and check that the values are correct. but otherwise, I think this is good.

Hey @s-gobriel, if you have concern about this, we can add in additional tests now, or if we want to get it merged immediately we should create an issue to immediately develop these tests as a task next quarter. I might suggest the latter, but I'm okay with either decision.

@s-gobriel
Copy link
Contributor

I understand. Let's add these tests in the next quarter, especially that the python test is covering the functionality

Copy link

Target CPP Coverage: 64.3906%
Source CPP Coverage: 63.9842%

Target Python Coverage: 98.02%
Source Python Coverage: 98.02%

@s-gobriel s-gobriel merged commit a1874e6 into develop Aug 29, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@cwlacewe cwlacewe added this to the v2.10.0 Tasks milestone Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants