Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Entry flow UX changes - Part 2 #177

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 16, 2018
Merged

Conversation

brianpeiris
Copy link
Contributor

@brianpeiris brianpeiris commented Apr 11, 2018

See commit list for changes.
For #116. Building on #175.

@brianpeiris brianpeiris changed the base branch from master to feature/ux-changes April 11, 2018 00:14
@gfodor gfodor mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2018
16 tasks
@brianpeiris brianpeiris changed the base branch from feature/ux-changes to master April 11, 2018 00:19
@brianpeiris brianpeiris changed the base branch from master to feature/ux-changes April 11, 2018 00:19
@brianpeiris brianpeiris requested a review from gfodor April 12, 2018 01:50
<iframe
className="profile-entry__avatar-selector"
src={`/${this.props.htmlPrefix}avatar-selector.html#avatar_id=${this.state.avatar_id}`}
ref={ifr => (this.avatarSelector = ifr)}
/>
{!this.props.store.state.profile.has_agreed_to_terms && (
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gfodor does it make sense to hide the term checkbox after the user has agreed to it?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think so

"profile.terms.privacy": "privacy policy",
"profile.terms.conjunction": "and",
"profile.terms.tou": "terms of use",
"profile.terms.suffix": ".",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gfodor Terms copy needs your review.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes we can send this to legal once they get things wrapped up

<FormattedMessage id="profile.terms.conjunction" />{" "}
<a className="profile-entry__terms__link" target="_blank" href="/terms">
<FormattedMessage id="profile.terms.tou" />
</a>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gfodor Linking to non-existent /privacy and /terms urls for now.

src/hub.js Outdated

getAvailableVREntryTypes().then(availableVREntryTypes => {
uiRoot.setState({ availableVREntryTypes });
uiRoot.handleForcedVREntryType();
console.log('BPDEBUG availableVREntryTypes', availableVREntryTypes);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

log

src/hub.js Outdated
const uiRoot = mountUI(scene);
mountUI(scene);

const remountUI = () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe set things up so instead of having to mutate uiRootProps everywhere, the k/vs to alter are arguments to this function?

@brianpeiris brianpeiris merged commit e8c5f73 into feature/ux-changes Apr 16, 2018
@brianpeiris brianpeiris deleted the feature/ux-changes-2 branch April 20, 2018 01:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants