Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Bump protobuf to 3.19 and lock on minor version #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

daemonsy
Copy link
Contributor

@daemonsy daemonsy commented Jan 27, 2022

  1. In feat: Remove erronous? lock to x86_64-linux #150, the intention was to remove the platform lock. In that PR, google-protobuf was locked to 3.13.x as per the gemspec and specs.

  2. However in reality, consumers could have been installing 3.19.x which I think is very common. We should relax the lock to minor version which lets people bump to the latest minor version.

  3. But I've also bumped the requirement to ~> 3.19 because of this CVE

This should result in a bump to 2.1.0 and that should be alright because of point 2 and if you're locked to below protobuf 3.19, the major release should guard that

@daemonsy daemonsy changed the title feat: Bump protobuf to 3.19 and lock on patch version fix: Bump protobuf to 3.19 and lock on patch version Jan 27, 2022
@daemonsy daemonsy changed the title fix: Bump protobuf to 3.19 and lock on patch version fix: Bump protobuf to 3.19 and lock on minor version Jan 27, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@geshwho geshwho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@daemonsy daemonsy merged commit d3f9c00 into main Jan 27, 2022
@daemonsy daemonsy deleted the protobuf branch January 27, 2022 15:05
@rylanc
Copy link
Contributor

rylanc commented Jan 27, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants