Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Gradle Property and Provider to enable lazy evaluation for jib.extraDirectories parameters #3737
Use Gradle Property and Provider to enable lazy evaluation for jib.extraDirectories parameters #3737
Changes from 20 commits
a55e53a
019fd65
3402b29
63319af
5e6f237
a5f1aee
56cb69e
b43c295
7370713
1360011
1819eb3
b2815b7
798882d
b79d5ec
925d5c3
af4bb2c
4d986fa
bd9183d
11d9dd1
c7e131e
f380733
96197cf
25e47a5
6f0a3b7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this check even matter? There is no harm in setting permissions to an equivalent object.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True! I saw that both PR #3242 and #3034 both included this check in the getter, and my understanding was that we wanted to avoid setting a property multiple times here?