Fixing notification condition #4881
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the addition of a new key-value pair in multiple localization files ( Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/AdminActions.tsx (1)
83-88: LGTM! Consider extracting the label ID logic.The conditional label change for the verification option improves UX by providing appropriate context when resuming a draft. However, the nested
formatMessagecalls could be simplified.Consider extracting the label ID logic:
+const getVerificationLabelId = (status: EVerificationStatus) => + status === EVerificationStatus.DRAFT + ? 'label.resume_your_project' + : 'label.verify_your_project'; { label: formatMessage({ - id: formatMessage({ - id: - verificationFormStatus === EVerificationStatus.DRAFT - ? 'label.resume_your_project' - : 'label.verify_your_project', - }), + id: getVerificationLabelId(verificationFormStatus), }), // ... rest of the option config }src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx (2)
54-60: Consider adding type safety for verificationFormStatus comparisonThe condition logic is correct for determining when to show the "verified but not eligible" notification to project owners. However, consider using the enum type explicitly to prevent potential issues with string comparisons.
- projectData.verificationFormStatus !== EVerificationStatus.VERIFIED; + projectData.verificationFormStatus !== EVerificationStatus.VERIFIED as EVerificationStatus;
Line range hint
1-24: Consider refactoring to improve maintainabilityThe notification logic has grown complex with multiple conditions and UI states. Consider these architectural improvements:
- Extract the notification states into a configuration object
- Use a state machine or lookup table pattern instead of the long if-else chain
Example approach:
type NotificationState = 'VERIFIED_ELIGIBLE' | 'VERIFIED_NOT_ELIGIBLE' | 'NOT_VERIFIED' | /* other states */; const getNotificationState = (props: { isVerified: boolean, isAdmin: boolean, isGivbackEligible: boolean, verificationFormStatus: EVerificationStatus, projectStatus: EProjectStatus }): NotificationState => { // Return appropriate state based on conditions }; const notificationConfig: Record<NotificationState, { title: string, description: string, color: string, icon: ReactNode, link: string, button?: ReactNode }> = { // Configure UI elements for each state };Also applies to: 54-60, 187-209
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
lang/ca.json(1 hunks)lang/en.json(1 hunks)lang/es.json(1 hunks)src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/AdminActions.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectCardNotification.tsx(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- lang/ca.json
- lang/en.json
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectCardNotification.tsx (4)
9-9: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate
The addition of EVerificationStatus import is necessary for the new verification status checks.
27-27: LGTM: Clean implementation of early return pattern
The condition usage follows React best practices with a clear early return pattern.
19-25: Verify handling of all verification form statuses
The condition logic and naming improvements look good. However, let's verify we're handling all possible verification form statuses correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Verification form status handling is complete and correct
The condition correctly handles all possible verification form statuses. From the enum definition in src/apollo/types/types.ts, we can see there are only four possible statuses:
VERIFIEDDRAFTSUBMITTEDREJECTED
The condition projectData.verificationFormStatus !== EVerificationStatus.VERIFIED && projectData.verificationFormStatus !== EVerificationStatus.SUBMITTED will show the notification for DRAFT and REJECTED states, which is the correct behavior for prompting users about incomplete forms.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for all possible verification form statuses to ensure we're not missing any cases
# Search for EVerificationStatus enum definition and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'enum EVerificationStatus {
$$$
}'
# Check for other status checks in similar components
rg -A 3 'verificationFormStatus.*EVerificationStatus'
Length of output: 2524
Line range hint 33-37: Verify notification message consistency
Let's ensure the notification message and logic are consistent across all related components.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the notification patterns and related components.
Let me check one more aspect to verify the notification implementation across GIVbacks related components.
The notification implementation is consistent with the project's GIVbacks notification system
The notification in ProjectCardNotification.tsx is part of a well-structured notification system for GIVbacks eligibility. The message key project.givback_toast.complete_eligibility is properly localized across language files (en, es, ca), and the implementation aligns with the project's main GIVbacks toast component (ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx), which handles various GIVbacks-related states and notifications.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of the givback_toast.complete_eligibility message and similar notification patterns
# Check for message key usage
rg "givback_toast.complete_eligibility"
# Look for similar notification patterns in other components
ast-grep --pattern 'const $notificationVar = $condition && !isGivbackEligible && $$$'
Length of output: 597
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar notification components and IconAlertCircle usage
rg -A 3 "IconAlertCircle" src/
# Look for other GIVbacks eligibility related components
rg -l "isGivbackEligible"
# Check for similar toast/notification patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'formatMessage({
id: $messageId,
})'
Length of output: 7532
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check ProjectGIVbackToast and other notification components
rg -A 5 "ProjectGIVbackToast" src/
cat src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx
# Look for similar notification patterns in project-related components
rg -A 3 "givback.*toast" src/
Length of output: 15275
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/AdminActions.tsx (1)
83-88: Verify the new label key exists in all language files.
The new label key 'label.resume_your_project' must exist in all language files to prevent missing translation issues.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the translations.
Let me try a different approach to search for the translation keys.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I found both translation keys ('label.resume_your_project' and 'label.verify_your_project') present in all language files (en.json, es.json, and ca.json).
Both label keys exist in all language files and are properly translated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new label key exists in all language files
# Expected: The key should exist in all JSON files under lang/ directory
echo "Checking for 'label.resume_your_project' in language files:"
fd -e json . lang/ -x jq -r 'has("label.resume_your_project") | if . then "✓" else "✗" end | "\(./) \(.)"' {}
Length of output: 2201
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all language files
echo "Language files found:"
fd -e json . lang/
# Now let's try to check the content of these files
echo -e "\nChecking content of language files:"
fd -e json . lang/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 155281
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for both label keys in all files
echo "Searching for label.resume_your_project and label.verify_your_project:"
rg "label\.(resume|verify)_your_project" --type json
Length of output: 3263
lang/es.json (1)
1200-1200: LGTM! The Spanish translation is accurate and consistent.
The added translation "label.resume_your_project": "Reanudar el formulario de GIVbacks" is:
- Consistent with the English (
"Resume GIVbacks Form") and Catalan ("Reprèn el formulari de GIVbacks") translations mentioned in the AI summary - Accurately conveys the meaning in Spanish
- Uses appropriate terminology for the GIVbacks context
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ProjectGIVbackToastcomponent to display notifications based on project verification status.AdminActionsdropdown to conditionally display verification options based on the project’s verification status.Bug Fixes
ProjectCardNotificationto refine when notifications are displayed based on project verification and eligibility.Documentation