Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing statuses for unverified email #4879

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kkatusic
Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic commented Nov 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a tooltip for unverified users in the ProjectTabs component, enhancing user experience with contextual information.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined email verification status handling by consolidating logic into a single variable across multiple components.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted the rendering logic to ensure consistent display of email verification status without altering existing functionality.

@kkatusic kkatusic self-assigned this Nov 27, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 27, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 27, 2024 8:14pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new variable, isEmailVerifiedStatus, across several components to streamline the logic for determining email verification status based on user roles. This variable replaces previous direct references to isAdminEmailVerified, ensuring a consistent approach to handling email verification in the ProjectGIVbackToast, ProjectIndex, and ProjectTabs components. Additionally, the ProjectTabs component receives a tooltip feature for unverified users, enhancing the user interface without altering existing functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx Introduced isEmailVerifiedStatus variable; updated $isverified prop and tooltip rendering logic.
src/components/views/project/ProjectIndex.tsx Introduced isEmailVerifiedStatus variable; updated verified prop for ProjectTabs; minor useEffect adjustment.
src/components/views/project/ProjectTabs.tsx Added TooltipWrapper and LinkWrapper components; implemented tooltip for unverified users.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Code Review

Suggested reviewers

  • CarlosQ96
  • MohammadPCh

🐰 "In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
New variables sprout, as clear as can be.
Tooltips for guidance, a hop and a skip,
Email verified? Just take a quick dip!
With every small change, our project does bloom,
Together we code, dispelling the gloom!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/components/views/project/ProjectTabs.tsx (2)

Line range hint 59-98: Enhance accessibility and user feedback for unverified users

While the click prevention works, the implementation could be improved for better accessibility and user experience.

Consider these improvements:

 <LinkWrapper
   key={i.title}
   href={`${Routes.Project}/${slug}${
     i.query ? `?tab=${i.query}` : ''
   }`}
   scroll={false}
+  aria-disabled={!verified && i.query === EProjectPageTabs.UPDATES}
+  role="link"
   onClick={e => {
     if (
       !verified &&
       i.query === EProjectPageTabs.UPDATES
     ) {
       e.preventDefault();
+      // Provide visual feedback that action is disabled
+      e.currentTarget.blur();
     }
   }}
 >

134-158: Improve tooltip positioning and responsiveness

The current tooltip implementation might cause issues on smaller screens and with longer translated text.

Consider these styling improvements:

 const TooltipWrapper = styled.div`
   position: absolute;
   bottom: 18%;
   left: 100%;
+  max-width: 250px;
+  word-wrap: break-word;
   background: #1a1a1a;
   color: #fff;
   padding: 8px 12px;
   border-radius: 4px;
   font-size: 12px;
-  white-space: nowrap;
   opacity: 0;
   visibility: hidden;
   transition:
     opacity 0.2s ease-in-out,
     visibility 0.2s ease-in-out;
-  z-index: 500;
+  z-index: var(--z-tooltip, 500);
+  
+  @media (max-width: 768px) {
+    left: 50%;
+    transform: translateX(-50%);
+    bottom: -100%;
+  }
 `;
src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx (3)

359-359: Fix styled-component prop naming convention

The prop $isverified should follow camelCase convention as $isVerified to maintain consistency with TypeScript/JavaScript naming conventions.

-<Wrapper $isverified={isEmailVerifiedStatus}>
+<Wrapper $isVerified={isEmailVerifiedStatus}>

Line range hint 389-393: Enhance tooltip accessibility

The current tooltip implementation lacks proper accessibility features. Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add ARIA attributes for screen readers
  2. Support keyboard navigation
  3. Ensure the tooltip is visible when focused
-{!isEmailVerifiedStatus && (
-  <TooltipWrapper>
-    {formatMessage({ id: 'label.email_tooltip' })}
-  </TooltipWrapper>
-)}
+{!isEmailVerifiedStatus && (
+  <TooltipWrapper
+    role="tooltip"
+    aria-label={formatMessage({ id: 'label.email_tooltip' })}
+    tabIndex={0}
+  >
+    {formatMessage({ id: 'label.email_tooltip' })}
+  </TooltipWrapper>
+)}

Also consider using an established tooltip library like @radix-ui/react-tooltip that handles accessibility out of the box.


Line range hint 332-339: Fix incomplete useEffect dependencies

The useEffect hook is missing router in its dependency array, which could lead to stale closures and potential memory leaks.

  useEffect(() => {
    if (isUserLoading) return;
    const { open } = router.query;
    const _open = Array.isArray(open) ? open[0] : open;
    if (_open === 'boost') {
      handleBoostClick();
    }
-  }, [isUserLoading, router]);
+  }, [isUserLoading, router, handleBoostClick]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3376e29 and 5c2c53d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/components/views/project/ProjectIndex.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/components/views/project/ProjectTabs.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/views/project/ProjectTabs.tsx (1)

Line range hint 59-98: Verify consistent unverified email handling

The implementation looks good and aligns with the PR objectives. Let's verify that this behavior is consistent with other components that handle unverified email states.

Also applies to: 134-158

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different search patterns to gather more information about email verification handling across the codebase.


Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about email verification handling across the codebase.

Email verification handling is consistent across components

The implementation in ProjectTabs.tsx aligns with the codebase's email verification patterns:

  • Consistent tooltip usage and styling in ProjectTabs.tsx and ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx
  • Same email verification tooltip message used across components
  • Similar verification state handling in other components like ProfileProjectsTab.tsx and AdminActions.tsx
  • Proper prevention of unverified user actions through preventDefault
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar unverified email handling patterns
rg -l "verified.*email" --type tsx

# Look for other components using similar tooltip patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'TooltipWrapper = styled.div'

# Check for other click prevention patterns
rg "preventDefault.*verified"

Length of output: 278


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for verification-related patterns
rg -A 2 "verified\s*[=:]" 

# Search for email verification tooltips
rg "email.*tooltip" -A 2

# Look for components using TooltipWrapper
rg "TooltipWrapper" -A 2

# Search for verification-related types/enums
rg "interface.*Verified|type.*Verified|enum.*Verified"

Length of output: 7761

src/components/views/project/ProjectIndex.tsx (2)

102-102: LGTM! Clear and focused email verification logic.

The introduction of isEmailVerifiedStatus effectively differentiates between admin and non-admin users, maintaining strict verification for admins while being lenient for regular users.


231-231: Verify the ProjectTabs component's handling of the verified prop.

The change from isAdminEmailVerified to isEmailVerifiedStatus looks correct. However, let's verify how ProjectTabs handles this prop to ensure it aligns with the new verification logic.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about how the verified prop is used in the ProjectTabs component.


Let me try one more search to find the complete implementation of ProjectTabs component and how it uses the verified prop.


The change from isAdminEmailVerified to isEmailVerifiedStatus is correctly implemented and handled in ProjectTabs.

The ProjectTabs component uses the verified prop to:

  • Control access to the Updates tab
  • Show/hide a tooltip for unverified users
  • Apply opacity styling to the Updates tab when unverified
  • Prevent navigation to Updates tab for unverified users

The implementation aligns perfectly with the verification status change.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how ProjectTabs handles the verified prop

# Search for ProjectTabs component definition and its usage of verified prop
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
  $$$
  verified?: $_
  $$$
}'

# Search for any conditional rendering or logic based on verified prop
ast-grep --pattern 'const ProjectTabs = ($_) => {
  $$$
  verified
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 3244


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation details of ProjectTabs component
rg -U "const ProjectTabs.*?^}" -A 10 src/components/views/project/ProjectTabs.tsx

# Also search for any usage of verified prop in rendering logic
rg "verified\?" --type ts src/components/views/project/ProjectTabs.tsx -A 5

Length of output: 352


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the complete file content to understand the implementation
cat src/components/views/project/ProjectTabs.tsx

# Also search for any references to ProjectTabs in the ProjectIndex file
rg "ProjectTabs" src/components/views/project/ProjectIndex.tsx -A 5

Length of output: 4482

src/components/views/project/ProjectGIVbackToast.tsx (1)

57-57: Verify the email verification logic for non-admin users

The current implementation considers non-admin users as verified by default (isEmailVerifiedStatus = true). This seems counterintuitive and could potentially bypass important verification checks.

Consider renaming to isAdminEmailVerifiedOrNotAdmin for clarity, or verify if non-admin users should actually have their email verification status checked.

Copy link
Collaborator

@CarlosQ96 CarlosQ96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks kecchy

@kkatusic kkatusic merged commit 0083fd3 into develop Nov 28, 2024
3 checks passed
@kkatusic kkatusic deleted the fix/email_verification branch November 28, 2024 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: QA
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants