-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(26270): Add Skeleton UI for Money Requests #26613
Conversation
@mananjadhav Is it possible that you can push the rest of the changes soon? I think we want to fix this as soon as possible 🙇 (i.e. we want to deploy this to production) |
I am just working on the checklist. |
@shawnborton @fedirjh @mountiny One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button] |
@hayata-suenaga @mountiny @shawnborton @fedirjh The PR is ready. |
niiice, videos looking good! |
@parasharrajat I've fixed the comments. Should've raised a PR fresh in the morning to avoid silly changes. Thanks for catching those. |
@mananjadhav Can you please fix the attachments on the descriptions? It seems some are not rendered. We can work on it in the IST zone in the morning to if there are more requests. |
@parasharrajat I've updated the description so that
Sure that'll be great! |
I am seeing something strange. On every Money Report(iOU, Expense), it first shows a bottom skeleton loader and then it will be replaced with normal messages as well IOU preview. Is this correct? Check video from 0.15 Sec. Screen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.2.16.27.AM.mov |
Yeah I thought so too. I am only replacing with the skeleton view, the behavior exists for other wise IOU requests too. I don't have the message context too that I can replace the message with any other skeleton view. Check from 00:13 secs. iou-shifting-action-item.mov |
Yeah I think the last thing is fine |
I see. In that case, it is fine. |
@mananjadhav What about |
@mananjadhav typescript and jest tests are failing |
Lets address those and the whisper hover and we can ship it |
@mountiny I am fixing the whisper style, but the actions seem to be unrelated to the change.
|
@rezkiy37 Thanks for reporting the issue, but for some reason I am not able to reproduce this issue at my end. Can you tell me the reproduction steps? web-whisper-hover-style.mov |
Yeah, I see. Let try one more time, maybe someone has fixed it right now 😅 |
Checking lint issues and other fixes. |
Hah, it was fixed in another PR that was merged 3 hours ago. No bug anymore 🙂 |
|
@mountiny @parasharrajat @rezkiy37 do we have any more outstanding comments? |
From my side, LGTM! |
Will do the checklist in 20 minutes. |
Screenshots🔲 iOS / nativeScreen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.8.41.54.PM.mov🔲 iOS / SafariScreen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.8.34.58.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / DesktopScreen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.8.43.40.PM.movScreen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.8.44.42.PM.mov🔲 MacOS / ChromeScreen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.8.22.24.PM.mov🔲 Android / ChromeScreen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.8.39.28.PM.mov🔲 Android / nativeScreen.Recording.2023-09-04.at.8.32.07.PM.mov |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewer Checklist
- I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
- I verified the correct issue is linked in the
### Fixed Issues
section above - I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
Tests
section - I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the
QA steps
section - I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the
- I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
- I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
- I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
- If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
- I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
toggleReport
and notonIconClick
). - I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g.
myBool && <MyComponent />
. - I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to
src/languages/*
files and using the translation method - I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the
Waiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy. - I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in
STYLE.md
) were followed
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e.
- If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
- I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
- I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like
Avatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
have been tested & I retested again) - I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
- I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
- If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a
/** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to
this
properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}
the methodthis.submit
should be bound tothis
in the constructor) - Any internal methods bound to
this
are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);
ifthis.submit
is never passed to a component event handler likeonClick
) - All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
- If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
- If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e.
StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG
)
- If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
- If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like
Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases) - If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
- If a new page is added, I verified it's using the
ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page. - If the
main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps. - I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for all the hard work!
✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release. |
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.63-0 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.63-2 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.64-0 🚀
|
🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.64-2 🚀
|
/> | ||
<Text style={[styles.textLabelSupporting, styles.mb1, styles.lh20]}>{getSettledMessage()}</Text> | ||
</> | ||
{_.isEmpty(props.transaction) ? ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This caused regression of showing skeleton forever when delete money request offline - #26939
Because transaction data is also deleted optimistically.
src={Expensicons.DotIndicator} | ||
width={4} | ||
height={4} | ||
additionalStyles={[styles.mr1, styles.ml1]} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Coming from Dot separator in the report preview component appears bottom aligned
#29543
styles.mb1
isn't passed to Icon
.
Details
SkeletonView
to the Money Requests, while the transaction is being loaded.Fixed Issues
$ #26270
PROPOSAL:
Tests
Offline tests
QA Steps
For all platforms
PR Author Checklist
### Fixed Issues
section aboveTests
sectionOffline steps
sectionQA steps
sectiontoggleReport
and notonIconClick
)myBool && <MyComponent />
.src/languages/*
files and using the translation methodWaiting for Copy
label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.STYLE.md
) were followedAvatar
, I verified the components usingAvatar
are working as expected)/** comment above it */
this
properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. foronClick={this.submit}
the methodthis.submit
should be bound tothis
in the constructor)this
are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoidthis.submit = this.submit.bind(this);
ifthis.submit
is never passed to a component event handler likeonClick
)StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
)Avatar
is modified, I verified thatAvatar
is working as expected in all cases)ScrollView
component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.main
branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to theTest
steps.Screenshots/Videos
Web
Distance Requests
web-iou-skeleton-ui-3.mov
Multiple Requests
web-iou-skeleton-ui-2.mov
IOU Requests
web-iou-skeleton-ui-1.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mweb-chrome-ioi-skeleton-ui.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
mweb-safari-iou-skeleton-ui.mov
Desktop
desktop-iou-skeleton-ui.mov
iOS
ios-iou-skeleton-ui.mov
Android
android-iou-skeleton-ui.mov