PasswordForm Function Migration #20515

esh-g · 2023-06-09T13:03:39Z

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #16300
PROPOSAL: #16300 (comment)

Tests

For Local Testing

Disable Passwordless login by returning false from the function canUsePasswordlessLogin in Permissions.js.
Sign-out of your account.
Enter email of an account having a password set previously.
In the password screen, verify that we can see errors, all buttons work correctly and we are able to login.

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Sign-out of your account.
Enter email of an account having a password set previously and having passwordless login disabled.
In the password screen, verify that we can see errors, all buttons work correctly and we are able to login.

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Screen.Recording.2023-06-09.at.6.31.51.PM.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

Screen.Recording.2023-06-10.at.8.42.40.AM.mov

Screen.Recording.2023-06-10.at.8.28.09.AM.mov

Mobile Web - Safari

Screen.Recording.2023-06-10.at.8.12.51.AM.mov

Desktop

Screen.Recording.2023-06-10.at.8.19.28.AM-1.mov

iOS

Screen.Recording.2023-06-10.at.8.11.36.AM.mov

Android

Screen.Recording.2023-06-10.at.8.26.22.AM.mov

melvin-bot · 2023-06-09T13:03:45Z

@yuwenmemon @fedirjh One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

esh-g · 2023-06-09T13:05:28Z

@yuwenmemon @fedirjh I have been testing this by setting canUsePasswordless to false in Permissions.js... I'm not sure what to enter in the QA steps.. Could you please discuss that? I'll edit the steps once we finalize them.

fedirjh · 2023-06-09T21:40:08Z

@esh-g Can you please include all screenshots.

I have been testing this by setting canUsePasswordless to false in Permissions.js

As for testing steps , for local dev testing we can include that. For QA, I think we can just require an account with passwordless disabled (not sure if this is still valid case).

esh-g · 2023-06-10T01:22:06Z

@esh-g Can you please include all screenshots.

Yes, just wanted to make sure I had the right steps... I'll edit and add the steps

esh-g · 2023-06-10T03:17:04Z

@fedirjh Updated the steps and added videos for each platform.

esh-g · 2023-06-13T17:55:45Z

@fedirjh @yuwenmemon Is there something else that needs to be done on my end?

yuwenmemon · 2023-06-13T18:58:58Z

@fedirjh will be doing a first-pass review. @fedirjh bump!

fedirjh · 2023-06-13T19:46:35Z

@esh-g Can you please take a look at this console error, It happen when we click Forgot?

fedirjh

Code looks good , left few comments about eslint and little bug , maybe caused by disabling eslint.

fedirjh · 2023-06-13T20:30:31Z

src/pages/signin/PasswordForm.js

+            clearPassword();
+        }
+        // We cannot add password to the dependency list because it will clear every time it updates
+        // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps


@esh-g We shouldn’t disable eslint for react-hooks/exhaustive-deps . Actually, since password is not included in the deps array this hook will always run with the initial password's value. Finally, the autofill feature is broken, when you select a saved login with password , both login and password should be filled.

fedirjh · 2023-06-13T20:31:19Z

src/pages/signin/PasswordForm.js

            return;
        }
+        validateAndSubmitForm();
+        // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps -- We don't need to call this when the function changes.


We shouldn’t disable eslint here as well ,

We don't need to call this when the function changes.

can you please explain this comment ? what happens if we call the hook when the function changes ?

Well it was more of an optimisation tweak to make sure that we are not running this on any unintentional changes, but I don't think it will matter if we include it or not. So anyway, I'll include it.

esh-g · 2023-06-14T07:52:32Z

@fedirjh This error is occurring in the SignInPageLayout

App/src/pages/signin/SignInPage.js

Line 115 in 23978e4

let welcomeText = '';

Here first it was not set to empty string and was undefined. In the latest main, it will not occur

esh-g · 2023-06-14T07:57:46Z

Autofill I think is working on my end...

Screen.Recording.2023-06-14.at.1.27.01.PM.mov

fedirjh · 2023-06-14T08:47:54Z

Autofill I think is working on my end...

@esh-g I am referring to the password manager , the saved password should be filled. the video you shared is password autosuggestion, here is expected behaviour

pass.mov

esh-g · 2023-06-14T09:00:47Z

@fedirjh Strange.. It seems to add it only on clicking.. Are you aware of any reason that it should happen?

Screen.Recording.2023-06-14.at.2.29.13.PM.mov

esh-g · 2023-06-14T09:04:32Z

Okay, I figured it out.. It happens because of the clear form code.. TBH, I too don't understand why this code is required. I just put it in because it was in the previous design. Should I remove these three lines?

fedirjh · 2023-06-14T09:18:26Z

Should I remove these three lines?

Before we remove it, we need to determine the reason behind its addition. Additionally, I have noticed a slight difference between the old implementation and the new one. Previously, we were checking both prevProps and props. However, in this refactor, we have eliminated the check for prevProps, which means there has been a change in the code. We should either fix it or refactor it accordingly.

// old check
        if (prevProps.isVisible && !this.props.isVisible && this.state.password) {

// actual check
        if (!props.isVisible && password) {

esh-g · 2023-06-14T09:22:52Z

@fedirjh I don't think we can access previous props in functional components unless we create a new hook ourselves.

function usePrevious(value) {
  const ref = useRef();
  useEffect(() => {
    ref.current = value;
  });
  return ref.current;
}

Moreover, this code is running when props.isVisible is changed, which automatically means that the previous value was different from the current one and since props.isVisible is a bool, we can easily say that it was the opposite of current value.

src/pages/signin/PasswordForm.js

Co-authored-by: Fedi Rajhi <[email protected]>

esh-g · 2023-06-14T14:13:21Z

@fedirjh Added your suggestion! 👍

fedirjh · 2023-06-15T06:39:30Z

@esh-g Can you please merge main

esh-g · 2023-06-15T06:45:55Z

@fedirjh Done!

fedirjh · 2023-06-15T08:17:23Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

Web.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

Chrome.mov

Mobile Web - Safari

Safari.mov

Desktop

Desktop.mov

iOS

IOS.mov

Android

Screen.Recording.2023-06-15.at.8.43.15.AM.mov

Screen.Recording.2023-06-15.at.8.43.47.AM.mov

fedirjh

LGTM and tests well

cc @yuwenmemon

OSBotify · 2023-06-15T17:04:21Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2023-06-16T18:51:07Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 1.3.29-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

kavimuru · 2023-06-19T12:52:57Z

@yuwenmemon @fedirjh We don't have account with passwordless disabled. How to run this PR?

fedirjh · 2023-06-19T15:05:31Z

@kavimuru We can't test this page without disabling passwordless.

yuwenmemon · 2023-06-19T18:51:45Z

@kavimuru just make sure the 2FA flow works and we should be good.

OSBotify · 2023-06-21T02:18:37Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.3.29-11 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

rayane-djouah · 2023-07-16T02:19:37Z

Hi @esh-g @fedirjh !
could you help me please? I need an account with a previously set password to test this PR

fedirjh · 2023-07-18T10:00:50Z

@rayane-djouah You can enable disable PasswordlessLogins in permissions file.

PasswordForm Function Migration

9dd673c

esh-g requested a review from a team as a code owner June 9, 2023 13:03

melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and yuwenmemon and removed request for a team June 9, 2023 13:03

signin

3d55aea

fedirjh suggested changes Jun 13, 2023

View reviewed changes

Fixing eslint disablings

2bc773b

fedirjh reviewed Jun 14, 2023

View reviewed changes

src/pages/signin/PasswordForm.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Update src/pages/signin/PasswordForm.js

457b920

Co-authored-by: Fedi Rajhi <[email protected]>

esh-g requested a review from fedirjh June 14, 2023 20:01

Merge branch 'main' into PasswordForm-FC-migration

ef23e0e

fedirjh approved these changes Jun 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

yuwenmemon approved these changes Jun 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

yuwenmemon merged commit 9727956 into Expensify:main Jun 15, 2023

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-06-16 #20928

Closed

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Jun 21, 2023

[HOLD for payment 2023-06-28] [$250] Migrate PasswordForm.js to function component #16300

Closed

1 task

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

PasswordForm Function Migration #20515

PasswordForm Function Migration #20515

esh-g commented Jun 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 9, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 9, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

esh-g commented Jun 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading

esh-g commented Jun 10, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 13, 2023

yuwenmemon commented Jun 13, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 13, 2023

fedirjh left a comment

fedirjh Jun 13, 2023

fedirjh Jun 13, 2023

esh-g Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

fedirjh commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 15, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 15, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 15, 2023

fedirjh left a comment

OSBotify commented Jun 15, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 16, 2023

kavimuru commented Jun 19, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 19, 2023

yuwenmemon commented Jun 19, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 21, 2023

rayane-djouah commented Jul 16, 2023

fedirjh commented Jul 18, 2023

PasswordForm Function Migration #20515

PasswordForm Function Migration #20515

Conversation

esh-g commented Jun 9, 2023 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 9, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 9, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 9, 2023 • edited Loading

esh-g commented Jun 10, 2023 • edited Loading

esh-g commented Jun 10, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 13, 2023

yuwenmemon commented Jun 13, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 13, 2023

fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

fedirjh Jun 13, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

fedirjh Jun 13, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

esh-g Jun 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023 • edited Loading

fedirjh commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023 • edited Loading

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 15, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 15, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 15, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

OSBotify commented Jun 15, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 16, 2023

kavimuru commented Jun 19, 2023

fedirjh commented Jun 19, 2023

yuwenmemon commented Jun 19, 2023

OSBotify commented Jun 21, 2023

rayane-djouah commented Jul 16, 2023

fedirjh commented Jul 18, 2023

esh-g commented Jun 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

fedirjh commented Jun 9, 2023 •

edited

Loading

esh-g commented Jun 10, 2023 •

edited

Loading

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

esh-g commented Jun 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading