-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-11-01] [HOLD for payment 2024-10-30] Account Settings - I don't receive the magic code to verify the account in wallet section #51258
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @trjExpensify ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @luacmartins ( |
💬 A slack conversation has been started in #expensify-open-source |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:
|
Testing now and chatting in the slack thread: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1729607715820819 For the breadcrumbs: Confirmed I can repro and on staging only. |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Account Settings - I don't receive the magic code to verify the account in wallet section What is the root cause of that problem?We remove the User.requestValidateCodeAction(); from useEffect here What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?Add the User.requestValidateCodeAction(); back to useEffect
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
Taking a look 👀 |
Being discussed here |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
PR merged and being CPed |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.52-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-10-30. 🎊 |
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Removing DeployBlockerCash label as this has been Cp'ed |
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.53-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-11-01. 🎊 |
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
Please assign me for C+ payment |
Done! |
Payment summary as follows:
Offer sent! |
Payment Summary
BugZero Checklist (@trjExpensify)
|
Waiting for @aimane-chnaif to accept the offer. |
Paid, closing! |
@trjExpensify @luacmartins Be sure to fill out the Contact List! |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!
Version Number: v9.0.52-2
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/5110296&group_by=cases:section_id&group_order=asc&group_id=229064
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The magic code to validate the account should be mailed on your first attempt.
Actual Result:
The magic code isn't received unless the option “Didn't receive a magic code?” is clicked.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Screenshots/Videos
Bug6642092_1729604981091.StagingND.mp4
View all open jobs on GitHub
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @trjExpensifyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: