Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Copy rho from guard cells in IGF solver #5284

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

RemiLehe
Copy link
Member

In principle, rho from the guard cells should be taken into account in the IGF solver.

In practice, it should not make a big difference, because the IGF is meant to be used with open boundaries, in which case particles are usually not meant to be reaching the boundaries.

@RemiLehe RemiLehe enabled auto-merge (squash) September 17, 2024 23:49
@RemiLehe RemiLehe merged commit 091c8d6 into ECP-WarpX:development Sep 18, 2024
37 checks passed
JustinRayAngus pushed a commit to LLNL/WarpX that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2024
* Copy rho from guard cells in IGF solver

* Reset checksum
@ax3l ax3l added the component: electrostatic electrostatic solver label Sep 25, 2024
ax3l added a commit to ax3l/WarpX that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
This reverts the inclusion of the guard cells when copying
rho. We could not yet determine why, but with this change
the FFT 3D solver in ImpactX does not converge to the
analytical solutions anymore.
RemiLehe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
* Skip Guard in IGF Solver (Revert #5284)

This reverts the inclusion of the guard cells when copying
rho. We could not yet determine why, but with this change
the FFT 3D solver in ImpactX does not converge to the
analytical solutions anymore.

* Reset Checksum
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: electrostatic electrostatic solver
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants