Skip to content

BIT.QR#(Unicode...)

Dzonatas edited this page Oct 16, 2012 · 9 revisions

ASCII:enter!

Twenty five pages felt like an issue.bit! The complete book is fuzzy, and "ASCII art" still makes sense for expressions other than primitive boxes.

#

(:GEM "urn=.")

In QR schemes, each "bit" includes four spaces. IPv4 numbers and names act like in intellectual response; however, it requires implementation before they become character(s).

Let xs: be symbolically equivalent to the character of "$". Now, xs:_ makes sense even in VMS worlds. We can then accomplish quick bit-friendly and network friendly codes. Remember "babel-fish," but now we want the expression of each character without age, sex, or location. We know, I know, YOU know, it is in the act when described, and those comments are not needed in the stream when not requested. The bits do...

.... .... .... ....

000: as the above denotes one QR BIT. Several of these as some slide show reveals frame techniques, as if .bin was the original end-point or made "lost+found." Unix uses this octet for binaries, yet US humans override that with ASCII.

[Note: My compiler removed words and considered the leftover symbols as weight, which kept it $Bison$ compatible for lexicons and more embedded character code (without pages).]

Consider one QR BIT works similar to "code pages." That already optimizes memory based on hexadecimal (where "rounding errors occur") instead of "256 character" pages or "4k buffer spaces." What Java does not include is the bit pattern of Unicode characters. It seems appropriate to consider QR BITs instead of "Unicode pages" that describe the characters. In that sense, each unicode character could be another fork of GitHub's ASCII version of Linux. (See also the many forks of linux that already exist here on GitHub)

It makes further sense of /lib/share with the many attempt to make special files out of the ASCII codes leftover in the original Unix handbooks. It is like someone realized that was best done for Unicode(s) instead of static types of character(s).

When we hex-dump /dev/hd*, it is best to remove the gamma headers and process it with schema. It sounds insane when there is peer pressure to support protocols like SSL and named pipes. I treat SSL as alpha software, now. It hinders the simplicity of above for reasons that are too expensive.

I can imagine GIT and TAR be .bin compatible. With QR BITs, these types can be moved out of the source and moved into any git.space. Compilers may process .git(s) as input for symbols and any version numbers of them. If you followed this then, .ar and .a files seem to make sense again, but I didn't (long) jump back into context.

We can return to the FAR pointer with QR BITs and HTTP(bit:x,bit:y) (fastcall). I put Mars in perspective about regression tests on fast-call techniques. If that were the case, "kbsd" may appear more like "khurd" in the Linux/GNU Hurd/BSD "way".

[":exit?" "You probably thought in octets of hexes." :O]