Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix fx related issues for agenttelemetry improvements #29789

Conversation

GustavoCaso
Copy link
Member

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso commented Oct 4, 2024

What does this PR do?

  • Fix the Fx related issues and linter. make sure the agenttelemetry follow the latest component framework guidance. Add a test for the new command
  • Make the new command follow the same pattern as the other to show display metadata. agent diagnose show-metadata agent-telemetrty
  • Ensure that if the agent telemetry feature is disable, calling the command agent diagnose show-metadata agent-telemetrty do not panic
  • Fix a few linters issues

Motivation

Help @iglendd get the agenttelemetry improvements PR merged 😄

Describe how to test/QA your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

…tions. Ensure we do panic when returning the agent-telemetry payload if agent telemetry is disable
@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso requested review from a team as code owners October 4, 2024 09:16
@@ -376,6 +371,11 @@ func (a *atel) run(profiles []*Profile) {
}

func (a *atel) writePayload(w http.ResponseWriter, _ *http.Request) {
if !a.enabled {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to check id the feature is enable otherwise a.logComp would panic 😄

@@ -376,6 +371,11 @@ func (a *atel) run(profiles []*Profile) {
}

func (a *atel) writePayload(w http.ResponseWriter, _ *http.Request) {
if !a.enabled {
httputils.SetJSONError(w, errors.New("agent-telemetry is not enabled. Please enable agent telemetry"), 400)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@iglendd I'm open to change the error message display to the users, maybe a link to the documentation would be nice

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: add3d311-39e2-49ec-95b2-bb512c6b2384 Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 596053e
Comparison: 0f63b8a

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +1.51 [+0.77, +2.24] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.87 [+0.06, +1.68] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.48 [+0.42, +0.53] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization +0.42 [-2.06, +2.90] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.39 [+0.29, +0.49] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +0.24 [-2.46, +2.95] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization +0.14 [+0.10, +0.19] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.11, +0.11] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
idle_all_features memory utilization -0.31 [-0.40, -0.22] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso force-pushed the fix-fx-related-issues-for-agenttelemetry-improvements branch from 12e7629 to 0f63b8a Compare October 4, 2024 10:54
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=46597670 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit e482bf1

[]string{"diagnose", "show-metadata", "agent-telemetry"},
printPayload,
func(_ core.BundleParams, secretParams secrets.Params) {
require.Equal(t, false, secretParams.Enabled)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ question: ‏What is the goal of this test ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would expect this test to check "agent-telemetry"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ogaca-dd @misteriaud fixed 😄

showAgentTelemetryCommand := &cobra.Command{
Use: "show-telemetry",
Use: "agent-telemetry",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: This is a breaking change. I guess this should be OK as the command is very new.

Copy link
Member Author

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso Oct 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not a breaking change as the command is not release yet. This PR uses this PR as the starting point #29770

The starting point PR hasn't being merge yet

[]string{"diagnose", "show-metadata", "agent-telemetry"},
printPayload,
func(_ core.BundleParams, secretParams secrets.Params) {
require.Equal(t, false, secretParams.Enabled)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would expect this test to check "agent-telemetry"

@GustavoCaso
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-11-07 15:09:11 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in len.gamburg/agent-telemetry-improve is 0s.

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 3501a68 into len.gamburg/agent-telemetry-improve Nov 7, 2024
218 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the fix-fx-related-issues-for-agenttelemetry-improvements branch November 7, 2024 15:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants