-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix fx related issues for agenttelemetry improvements #29789
Fix fx related issues for agenttelemetry improvements #29789
Conversation
…tions. Ensure we do panic when returning the agent-telemetry payload if agent telemetry is disable
@@ -376,6 +371,11 @@ func (a *atel) run(profiles []*Profile) { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func (a *atel) writePayload(w http.ResponseWriter, _ *http.Request) { | |||
if !a.enabled { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to check id the feature is enable otherwise a.logComp
would panic 😄
@@ -376,6 +371,11 @@ func (a *atel) run(profiles []*Profile) { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
func (a *atel) writePayload(w http.ResponseWriter, _ *http.Request) { | |||
if !a.enabled { | |||
httputils.SetJSONError(w, errors.New("agent-telemetry is not enabled. Please enable agent telemetry"), 400) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@iglendd I'm open to change the error message display to the users, maybe a link to the documentation would be nice
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsRun ID: add3d311-39e2-49ec-95b2-bb512c6b2384 Metrics dashboard Target profiles Baseline: 596053e Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.51 | [+0.77, +2.24] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.87 | [+0.06, +1.68] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.48 | [+0.42, +0.53] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | +0.42 | [-2.06, +2.90] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.39 | [+0.29, +0.49] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | +0.24 | [-2.46, +2.95] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.14 | [+0.10, +0.19] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.11, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.31 | [-0.40, -0.22] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed |
---|---|---|---|
✅ | idle | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
12e7629
to
0f63b8a
Compare
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=46597670 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit e482bf1 |
[]string{"diagnose", "show-metadata", "agent-telemetry"}, | ||
printPayload, | ||
func(_ core.BundleParams, secretParams secrets.Params) { | ||
require.Equal(t, false, secretParams.Enabled) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❓ question: What is the goal of this test ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would expect this test to check "agent-telemetry"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ogaca-dd @misteriaud fixed 😄
showAgentTelemetryCommand := &cobra.Command{ | ||
Use: "show-telemetry", | ||
Use: "agent-telemetry", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: This is a breaking change. I guess this should be OK as the command is very new.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is not a breaking change as the command is not release yet. This PR uses this PR as the starting point #29770
The starting point PR hasn't being merge yet
[]string{"diagnose", "show-metadata", "agent-telemetry"}, | ||
printPayload, | ||
func(_ core.BundleParams, secretParams secrets.Params) { | ||
require.Equal(t, false, secretParams.Enabled) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would expect this test to check "agent-telemetry"
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
3501a68
into
len.gamburg/agent-telemetry-improve
What does this PR do?
Fx
related issues and linter. make sure theagenttelemetry
follow the latest component framework guidance. Add a test for the new commandagent diagnose show-metadata agent-telemetrty
agent diagnose show-metadata agent-telemetrty
do not panicMotivation
Help @iglendd get the agenttelemetry improvements PR merged 😄
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes