Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Few agent telemetry improvements #29770

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

iglendd
Copy link
Contributor

@iglendd iglendd commented Oct 3, 2024

What does this PR do?

  • Finalize and categorize default metrics to emit split via 4 profiles
  • Eliminate Status-based telemetry
  • Add CLI agent diagnose show-telemetry command to dump emitted telemetry
  • Added host name and OS info for agent telemetry metadata

Motivation

Describe how to test/QA your changes

  • Enable agent telemetry
agent_telemetry:
  enabled: true
  • Run agent diagnose show-telemetry command

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

n/a

Additional Notes

n/a

* Finalize and categorize default metrics to emit split via 4 profiles
* Eliminate Status-based telemetry
* Add CLI `agent diagnose show-telemetry` command to dump emitted telemetry
* Added host name Os info for agent telemetry metadata
@iglendd iglendd force-pushed the len.gamburg/agent-telemetry-improve branch from d01681b to dfe7d15 Compare October 3, 2024 15:02
@iglendd iglendd added the qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests label Oct 3, 2024
@iglendd iglendd added this to the 7.59.0 milestone Oct 3, 2024
@iglendd iglendd marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 15:20
@iglendd iglendd requested review from a team as code owners October 3, 2024 15:20
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: e3c6954e-2854-464a-8658-211d5f8e818b Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 596053e
Comparison: 9925f5d

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization +2.22 [-0.24, +4.69] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.32 [-0.49, +1.14] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +0.16 [-2.52, +2.84] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.12 [-0.61, +0.85] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.11, +0.11] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
idle_all_features memory utilization -0.11 [-0.20, -0.03] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.17 [-0.21, -0.12] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization -0.26 [-0.30, -0.21] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.87 [-0.97, -0.76] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Comment on lines +215 to +219
metrics:
- name: oracle.activity_samples_count
- name: oracle.activity_latency
- name: oracle.statement_metrics
- name: oracle.statement_plan_errors
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @sethsamuel (in upcoming in the 7.60, I have moved metrics to more distinct sections (aka profiles). This one is for DB

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=48466195 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 3501a68

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso requested review from a team and GustavoCaso November 11, 2024 10:56
Copy link
Member

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🎉

@iglendd iglendd closed this Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/agent-metrics-logs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants