Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NPM-3571] Include system-probe telemetry in agent flare #29768

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

pimlu
Copy link
Contributor

@pimlu pimlu commented Oct 3, 2024

What does this PR do?

This PR adds the /telemetry endpoint from the system-probe unix socket server into the agent flare.

Motivation

This is part of an ongoing effort to add more information into the agent flare for NPM to reduce the round trips and TTR for support issues.

Describe how to test/QA your changes

While system-probe is running, you can view the /telemetry endpoint's data with one of these two commands (the path varies depending on config):

sudo curl --unix-socket /var/run/sysprobe.sock http://unix/
sudo curl --unix-socket /opt/datadog-agent/run/sysprobe.sock http://unix/telemetry

That output should match what you get when you run datadog-agent flare and unzip to get system_probe_telemetry.txt

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

system_probe_telemetry.txt is arbitrary and we can change it.

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: 4c69af7
Comparison: 7dc7b6c

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
agentwindowsamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
agentdarwinamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
agentdarwinarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
iot-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
iot-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
heroku-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
cluster-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
cluster-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
security-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe
security-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/flare/sysprobe

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=46178513 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 7dc7b6c

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 9f28e9b-70dd-49c7-8f20-e154188227ea Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: 4c69af7
Comparison: 7dc7b6c

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
idle_all_features memory utilization +0.71 [+0.62, +0.80] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization +0.56 [-0.18, +1.29] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.09 [+0.04, +0.13] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.10, +0.12] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.21 [-0.32, -0.10] 1 Logs
idle memory utilization -0.37 [-0.41, -0.32] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -0.54 [-3.29, +2.21] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization -1.43 [-3.91, +1.04] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -1.88 [-2.69, -1.08] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@pimlu pimlu marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 19:20
@pimlu pimlu requested review from a team as code owners October 3, 2024 19:20
@pimlu pimlu requested a review from a team October 3, 2024 19:20
@pimlu pimlu requested review from a team as code owners October 3, 2024 19:20
@pimlu pimlu requested a review from akarpz October 3, 2024 19:20
pkg/flare/archive.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@akarpz
Copy link
Contributor

akarpz commented Oct 3, 2024

out of curiosity, how does the data look once it's dumped into the text file? is it easy to inspect?

@pimlu
Copy link
Contributor Author

pimlu commented Oct 3, 2024

It seems pretty readable, it looks like this:

<...>
network_tracer__closed_conns{ip_proto="TCP"} 36
network_tracer__dns__decoding_errors 6
network_tracer__dns_cache__size 0
network_tracer__ebpf__closed_conn_polling_received 36
network_tracer__ebpf__double_flush_attempts_close 25
network_tracer__ebpf__double_flush_attempts_done 0
network_tracer__ebpf__failed_conn_polling_lost 47
<...>

@GustavoCaso
Copy link
Member

@pimlu from which Agent binary is intended to collect the system probe telemetry data? From the main agent or the security-agent?

Mostly to understand if the code logic should be place in pkg/flare/archive.go which is used for all Agent that implement the flare command or we should isolate only to the security agent.

Also, does the amount of imports from the change makes sense?
image

maybe we need to isolate some functions in individual packages to avoid that huge increase on imported packages

@pimlu pimlu force-pushed the stuart.geipel/agent-flare-telemetry branch from b8b30d4 to 77da77d Compare October 8, 2024 14:35
@pimlu
Copy link
Contributor Author

pimlu commented Oct 8, 2024

@GustavoCaso I have updated this PR, it now no longer pulls in so many imports

@pimlu pimlu requested a review from GustavoCaso October 9, 2024 14:38
Copy link
Member

@GustavoCaso GustavoCaso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work 🎉

@pimlu
Copy link
Contributor Author

pimlu commented Oct 9, 2024

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 26m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit cb7a94e into main Oct 9, 2024
210 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the stuart.geipel/agent-flare-telemetry branch October 9, 2024 16:29
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.60.0 milestone Oct 9, 2024
@robertjli
Copy link
Member

Removing team/processes, but please let me know if we do actually need a QA card for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants