Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move api code from cmd to comp #21359

Merged

Conversation

Kaderinho
Copy link
Contributor

@Kaderinho Kaderinho commented Dec 6, 2023

What does this PR do?

Move code from cmd to comp as a follow up of #21028

Motivation

This code should be under comp but was not in the first PR to avoid conflicts

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

Should be a noop

Reviewer's Checklist

  • If known, an appropriate milestone has been selected; otherwise the Triage milestone is set.
  • Use the major_change label if your change either has a major impact on the code base, is impacting multiple teams or is changing important well-established internals of the Agent. This label will be use during QA to make sure each team pay extra attention to the changed behavior. For any customer facing change use a releasenote.
  • A release note has been added or the changelog/no-changelog label has been applied.
  • Changed code has automated tests for its functionality.
  • Adequate QA/testing plan information is provided if the qa/skip-qa label is not applied.
  • At least one team/.. label has been applied, indicating the team(s) that should QA this change.
  • If applicable, docs team has been notified or an issue has been opened on the documentation repo.
  • If applicable, the need-change/operator and need-change/helm labels have been applied.
  • If applicable, the k8s/<min-version> label, indicating the lowest Kubernetes version compatible with this feature.
  • If applicable, the config template has been updated.

Copy link

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: e07ec60
Comparison: cf1e3c2

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
agentlinuxarm64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
agentwindowsamd64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
agentwindows386
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
agentdarwinamd64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
agentdarwinarm64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
iot-agentlinuxamd64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
iot-agentlinuxarm64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
heroku-agentlinuxamd64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
cluster-agentlinuxamd64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
cluster-agentlinuxarm64
+4, -5
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/agent
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/check
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/internal/config
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/agent
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/check
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/internal/config
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxamd64
+1, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxarm64
+1, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
security-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response
security-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -1
-github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/cmd/agent/api/response
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/comp/api/api/apiimpl/response

@Kaderinho Kaderinho added this to the 7.51.0 milestone Dec 6, 2023
@Kaderinho Kaderinho added [deprecated] qa/skip-qa - use other qa/ labels [DEPRECATED] Please use qa/done or qa/no-code-change to skip creating a QA card changelog/no-changelog team/agent-shared-components labels Dec 6, 2023
@Kaderinho Kaderinho marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2023 14:47
@Kaderinho Kaderinho requested review from a team as code owners December 6, 2023 14:47
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Dec 6, 2023

Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: f1c5864b-5be2-4721-b971-b34fa2eaf0b2
Baseline: e07ec60
Comparison: cf1e3c2
Total CPUs: 7

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

No interesting changes in experiment optimization goals with confidence ≥ 90.00% and |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%.

Experiments that were not declared erratic but were detected as being so, coefficient of variation cutoff 0.10:

experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI confidence
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.80 [+0.10, +1.51] 93.84%

Experiments where analysis encountered missing or malformed data:

idle

Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration.

Fine details of change detection per experiment.

experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI confidence
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.80 [+0.10, +1.51] 93.84%
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.50 [+0.44, +0.56] 100.00%
file_tree egress throughput +0.04 [-1.74, +1.82] 2.92%
dogstatsd_string_interner_128MiB_100 ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_100 ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_10k ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
trace_agent_json ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_1k ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_128MiB_1k ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_64MiB_100 ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_64MiB_1k ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_50k ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] 0.00%
dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_100k ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.03, +0.02] 15.56%
file_to_blackhole egress throughput -0.05 [-6.21, +6.12] 0.99%

Copy link
Member

@pgimalac pgimalac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just one question, should the path really be comp/api/api/apiimpl ?

@Kaderinho
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pgimalac it's a bit weird but the first api is for the bundle and the second api is for the component. I believe the bundle will be removed later

Copy link
Member

@L3n41c L3n41c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏻 for file owned by @DataDog/container-integrations

@Kaderinho
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 6, 2023

🚂 MergeQueue

Pull request added to the queue.

There are 3 builds ahead! (estimated merge in less than 2h)

you can cancel this operation by commenting your pull request with /merge -c!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 9553bd1 into main Dec 6, 2023
184 of 186 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the nicolas.guerguadj/move-api-code-from-cmd-to-comp branch December 6, 2023 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants