-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move api code from cmd to comp #21359
Move api code from cmd to comp #21359
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Guerguadj <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Guerguadj <[email protected]>
…comp Signed-off-by: Nicolas Guerguadj <[email protected]>
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: e07ec60
|
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot HereRegression Detector ResultsRun ID: f1c5864b-5be2-4721-b971-b34fa2eaf0b2 Explanation A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI". For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
No interesting changes in experiment optimization goals with confidence ≥ 90.00% and |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%. Experiments that were not declared erratic but were detected as being so, coefficient of variation cutoff 0.10:
Experiments where analysis encountered missing or malformed data: idle Usually, this warning means that there is no usable optimization goal data for that experiment, which could be a result of misconfiguration. Fine details of change detection per experiment.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just one question, should the path really be comp/api/api/apiimpl
?
@pgimalac it's a bit weird but the first |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍🏻 for file owned by @DataDog/container-integrations
/merge |
🚂 MergeQueue Pull request added to the queue. There are 3 builds ahead! (estimated merge in less than 2h) you can cancel this operation by commenting your pull request with |
What does this PR do?
Move code from cmd to comp as a follow up of #21028
Motivation
This code should be under
comp
but was not in the first PR to avoid conflictsAdditional Notes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Should be a noop
Reviewer's Checklist
Triage
milestone is set.major_change
label if your change either has a major impact on the code base, is impacting multiple teams or is changing important well-established internals of the Agent. This label will be use during QA to make sure each team pay extra attention to the changed behavior. For any customer facing change use a releasenote.changelog/no-changelog
label has been applied.qa/skip-qa
label is not applied.team/..
label has been applied, indicating the team(s) that should QA this change.need-change/operator
andneed-change/helm
labels have been applied.k8s/<min-version>
label, indicating the lowest Kubernetes version compatible with this feature.