-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update opentelemetry-mapping-go to v0.9.0 #21524
Conversation
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: e1ef601
|
Bloop Bleep... Dogbot HereRegression Detector ResultsRun ID: e62a8e9e-47c6-4bfe-a853-34c45c3667ae Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +1.25 | [-5.40, +7.90] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.27 | [-0.29, -0.25] |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.99 | [-1.09, -0.89] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole | % cpu utilization | +1.25 | [-5.40, +7.90] |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +0.33 | [-0.42, +1.08] |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.19 | [+0.13, +0.26] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_100k | ingress throughput | +0.06 | [+0.04, +0.07] |
➖ | trace_agent_json | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [+0.00, +0.06] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_128MiB_1k | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.05, +0.05] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_128MiB_100 | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.05, +0.05] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_10k | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.04, +0.04] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_100 | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.04, +0.04] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_1k | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.04, +0.04] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_64MiB_100 | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.04, +0.04] |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.06, +0.06] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_8MiB_50k | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.04, +0.04] |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.04, +0.04] |
➖ | dogstatsd_string_interner_64MiB_1k | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.04, +0.04] |
➖ | trace_agent_msgpack | ingress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.05, +0.01] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check | memory utilization | -0.22 | [-0.27, -0.18] |
➖ | process_agent_standard_check_with_stats | memory utilization | -0.25 | [-0.29, -0.20] |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | -0.27 | [-0.29, -0.25] |
➖ | process_agent_real_time_mode | memory utilization | -0.79 | [-0.82, -0.76] |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.99 | [-1.09, -0.89] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
d4841b2
to
4c1e252
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left you the tiniest of suggestions on the release note.
Co-authored-by: DeForest Richards <[email protected]>
@DataDog/agent-apm any chance you can review this? 🙏 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good from agent apm!
What does this PR do?
Bumps opentelemetry-mapping-go to v0.9.0.
Motivation
Include:
process.runtime.jvm.gc.duration
opentelemetry-mapping-go#213Additional Notes
The metrics change does not affect the OTLP ingest pipeline, since the Agent does not have the internal metrics pipeline enabled
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Send an OTLP log to the Agent and verify that milliseconds are shown in the timestamp on the UI.
Reviewer's Checklist
Triage
milestone is set.major_change
label if your change either has a major impact on the code base, is impacting multiple teams or is changing important well-established internals of the Agent. This label will be use during QA to make sure each team pay extra attention to the changed behavior. For any customer facing change use a releasenote.changelog/no-changelog
label has been applied.qa/skip-qa
label is not applied.team/..
label has been applied, indicating the team(s) that should QA this change.need-change/operator
andneed-change/helm
labels have been applied.k8s/<min-version>
label, indicating the lowest Kubernetes version compatible with this feature.