-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2091: fix missing return statement
warning
#2106
Conversation
Pipelines resultsPR tests (gcc-10, ubuntu, openmpi, no LB) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (clang-9, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-7, ubuntu, mpich, trace runtime, LB) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich, zoltan) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (clang-13, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (clang-12, ubuntu, mpich) Build for ba98f55 (2023-03-15 20:42:56 UTC)
PR tests (clang-14, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (clang-11, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-11, ubuntu, mpich, json schema test) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (nvidia cuda 11.0, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-12, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-8, ubuntu, mpich, address sanitizer) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (clang-10, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (intel icpc, ubuntu, mpich) Build for f3d2f04 (2023-03-21 18:56:38 UTC)
PR tests (nvidia cuda 11.2, ubuntu, mpich) Build for ( UTC)
|
icpx build was warning-free |
nvcc 11 still has the warning |
nvcc 11.2 as well as 11.0 :-( |
icpc was clean. This might be the best we can do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We may have to convert runLambda
back into a pair of specializations based on enable_if
if we actually want to silence the warning across all compilers.
4930373
to
ba98f55
Compare
Converting to draft as there are more warnings showing up:
vt/src/vt/objgroup/proxy/proxy_objgroup_elm.impl.h Lines 80 to 98 in edf105d
vt/src/vt/objgroup/proxy/proxy_objgroup.impl.h Lines 87 to 105 in edf105d
vt/src/vt/vrt/collection/send/sendable.impl.h Lines 133 to 156 in edf105d
vt/src/vt/vrt/collection/broadcast/broadcastable.impl.h Lines 180 to 200 in edf105d
|
ba98f55
to
f3d2f04
Compare
fixes #2091