155 add source and test file diffs in database logging

[EmbeddedDevops1]

PR Type

enhancement, tests

---

Description

• Enhanced the CoverAgent class with detailed docstrings for better code understanding and maintenance.
• Improved the test generation process by adding logging and validation steps.
• Added a new source_file field to the UnitTestDB to track the source file associated with each test generation attempt.
• Refactored CoverAgent tests to use temporary files, improving test isolation and reliability.
• Updated UnitTestDB tests to validate the inclusion of the source_file field.
• Incremented the version number to 0.1.50 to reflect these changes.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	CoverAgent.py Enhance CoverAgent with detailed docstrings and improved logic cover_agent/CoverAgent.py Added detailed docstrings to methods for better understanding. Improved logging and validation processes. Enhanced the test generation and coverage tracking logic. +67/-2    UnitTestDB.py Add source file tracking in UnitTestDB                                      cover_agent/UnitTestDB.py Added source_file field to UnitTestGenerationAttempt. Updated database operations to include the new field. +3/-0      UnitTestGenerator.py Include source file content in test validation                      cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py Added method to read source file content. Included source file in test validation results. +16/-0
Tests	test_CoverAgent.py Refactor CoverAgent tests with temporary files                      tests/test_CoverAgent.py Refactored tests to use temporary files for better isolation. Enhanced test coverage for CoverAgent functionalities. +64/-50  test_UnitTestDB.py Update UnitTestDB tests for source file field                        tests/test_UnitTestDB.py Updated tests to validate the new source_file field. Ensured comprehensive coverage for database operations. +10/-0
Miscellaneous	version.txt Update version to 0.1.50                                                                  cover_agent/version.txt Incremented version from 0.1.49 to 0.1.50. +1/-1

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 2c46021)

Action: run-integration-tests

Failed stage: Set up job [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed because it attempted to use a deprecated version of the actions/download-artifact action. Specifically, it used version v2, which is no longer supported.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 27: RepositoryProjects: write 28: SecurityEvents: write 29: Statuses: write 30: ##[endgroup] 31: Secret source: Actions 32: Prepare workflow directory 33: Prepare all required actions 34: Getting action download info 35: ##[error]This request has been automatically failed because it uses a deprecated version of `actions/download-artifact: v2`. Learn more: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-02-13-deprecation-notice-v1-and-v2-of-the-artifact-actions/

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Key issues to review Code Duplication The docstring for the _duplicate_test_file method appears to be incorrect. It's a copy of the __init__ method's docstring. Potential Memory Issue The entire source file is being read into memory and stored in self.source_code. For large files, this could lead to memory issues.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Use a context manager for Weights & Biases initialization to ensure proper cleanup Consider using a context manager for the Weights & Biases run to ensure proper cleanup, even if an exception occurs. cover_agent/CoverAgent.py [106-111] if "WANDB_API_KEY" in os.environ: # Initialize the Weights & Biases run wandb.login(key=os.environ["WANDB_API_KEY"]) time_and_date = datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S") run_name = f"{self.args.model}_" + time_and_date - wandb.init(project="cover-agent", name=run_name) + with wandb.init(project="cover-agent", name=run_name): + # Rest of the code goes here Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using a context manager for the Weights & Biases run ensures that resources are properly cleaned up even if an exception occurs, which is a best practice for resource management.	8
	Use a try-finally block to ensure temporary file cleanup Consider using a context manager for temporary file creation to ensure proper cleanup, even if an exception occurs. tests/test_CoverAgent.py [103-134] -with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(suffix=".py", delete=False) as temp_source_file: - with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(suffix=".py", delete=False) as temp_test_file: +try: + with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(suffix=".py", delete=False) as temp_source_file, \ + tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(suffix=".py", delete=False) as temp_test_file: args = argparse.Namespace( source_file_path=temp_source_file.name, test_file_path=temp_test_file.name, test_file_output_path="output_test_file.py", # This will be the path where output is copied code_coverage_report_path="coverage_report.xml", test_command="echo hello", test_command_dir=os.getcwd(), included_files=None, coverage_type="cobertura", report_filepath="test_results.html", desired_coverage=90, max_iterations=10, additional_instructions="", model="openai/test-model", api_base="openai/test-api", use_report_coverage_feature_flag=False, log_db_path="" ) with pytest.raises(AssertionError) as exc_info: agent = CoverAgent(args) agent.test_gen.get_coverage_and_build_prompt() agent._duplicate_test_file() assert "Fatal: Coverage report" in str(exc_info.value) mock_copy.assert_called_once_with(args.test_file_path, args.test_file_output_path) +finally: + # Clean up the temp files + os.remove(temp_source_file.name) + os.remove(temp_test_file.name) -# Clean up the temp files -os.remove(temp_source_file.name) -os.remove(temp_test_file.name) - Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Ensuring temporary files are cleaned up even if an exception occurs is important for preventing resource leaks, making this a valuable improvement.	8
Error handling	Add error handling for file reading operations Consider using a context manager for file operations to ensure proper file closure, even if an exception occurs. cover_agent/UnitTestGenerator.py [84-85] # Read self.source_file_path into a string -with open(self.source_file_path, "r") as f: - self.source_code = f.read() +try: + with open(self.source_file_path, "r") as f: + self.source_code = f.read() +except IOError as e: + self.logger.error(f"Error reading source file: {e}") + self.source_code = "" Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding error handling for file operations is a good practice to prevent the program from crashing due to unhandled exceptions, improving robustness.	7
Enhancement	Use parameterized tests to improve test coverage and reduce code duplication Consider using parameterized tests to reduce code duplication and improve test coverage for different scenarios. tests/test_UnitTestDB.py [30-57] -def test_insert_attempt(self, unit_test_db): - test_result = { - "status": "success", - "reason": "", - "exit_code": 0, - "stderr": "", - "stdout": "Test passed", - "test": { +@pytest.mark.parametrize("test_result, expected", [ + ( + { + "status": "success", + "reason": "", + "exit_code": 0, + "stderr": "", + "stdout": "Test passed", + "test": { + "test_code": "def test_example(): pass", + "new_imports_code": "import pytest" + }, + "source_file": "sample source code", + "original_test_file": "sample test code", + "processed_test_file": "sample new test code", + }, + { + "status": "success", + "reason": "", + "exit_code": 0, + "stderr": "", + "stdout": "Test passed", "test_code": "def test_example(): pass", - "new_imports_code": "import pytest" - }, - "source_file": "sample source code", - "original_test_file": "sample test code", - "processed_test_file": "sample new test code", - } - + "imports": "import pytest", + "source_file": "sample source code", + "original_test_file": "sample test code", + "processed_test_file": "sample new test code", + } + ), + # Add more test cases here +]) +def test_insert_attempt(self, unit_test_db, test_result, expected): attempt_id = unit_test_db.insert_attempt(test_result) assert attempt_id is not None attempt = unit_test_db.select_attempt(attempt_id) assert attempt is not None - assert attempt.status == "success" - assert attempt.reason == "" - assert attempt.exit_code == 0 - assert attempt.stderr == "" - assert attempt.stdout == "Test passed" - assert attempt.test_code == "def test_example(): pass" - assert attempt.imports == "import pytest" - assert attempt.source_file == "sample source code" - assert attempt.original_test_file == "sample test code" - assert attempt.processed_test_file == "sample new test code" + for key, value in expected.items(): + assert getattr(attempt, key) == value Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Parameterized tests can reduce code duplication and improve test coverage, but the suggestion is not crucial as the existing test already covers the intended functionality.	6

[EmbeddedDevops1]

⌛ Running integration tests: https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/actions/runs/10854020221

[EmbeddedDevops1]

⌛ Running integration testing after rebasing #158: https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/actions/runs/10854156849

[EmbeddedDevops1]

⌛ Running after resolving #159: https://github.com/Codium-ai/cover-agent/actions/runs/10854257152