Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mctpd: use new Bus Owner name of au.com.CodeConstruct.MCTP #34

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jk-ozlabs
Copy link
Member

We currently use a Bus Owner name of xyz.openbmc_project.MCTP, to suit conventions with the existing dbus interface names, and MCTP object path structure.

However, mctpd is not under the OpenBMC umbrella, so we should be using our own namespace instead.

Change to a Bus Owner value of au.com.CodeConstruct.MCTP, but keep the old value for compatibility. This will be removed in a future release, once we have confidence that consumers are using the new name.

We currently use a Bus Owner name of xyz.openbmc_project.MCTP, to suit
conventions with the existing dbus interface names, and MCTP object
path structure.

However, mctpd is not under the OpenBMC umbrella, so we should be using
our own namespace instead.

Change to a Bus Owner value of au.com.CodeConstruct.MCTP, but keep the
old value for compatibility. This will be removed in a future release,
once we have confidence that consumers are using the new name.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[email protected]>
@jk-ozlabs
Copy link
Member Author

Per some conversation on the OpenBMC discord, we may want to use this as an opportunity to implement a more comprehensive (and versioned) dbus object model.

@amboar
Copy link
Contributor

amboar commented May 16, 2024

(for the record, the conversation happens around here: https://discord.com/channels/775381525260664832/778790638563885086/1240142924381945856)

@jk-ozlabs
Copy link
Member Author

Closed by #43

@jk-ozlabs jk-ozlabs closed this Jun 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants