-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PR types to run actions #228
Conversation
…on on each synchronize)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you.
I will watch our billing-units in the next couple of days to see the impact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will not run after pushes during review, i.e. no way to trigger before merge and therefore not possible to set-up branch protection rules (which we currently don't have). It seems with this setup, one might accidentally merge broken code.
Adding manual triggers + branch protection rules could solve that, but the manual trigger UI is not very handy (action -> select action -> run workflow -> select branch -> start).
What about that: |
We could also add a
This would trigger a run by the action of the reviewer I guess not necessarily pushes to the repository.
|
And why not enable branch protection rules? Is there any reason we don't have it? |
So any progress here? If you don't find a solution I have to disable action for this repo to keep a minimum of resources for other repos. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check test fixes
I agree here, currently in the situation where I would like QA and tests to run before merging... |
Github actions will not longer be triggered upon each sync of the PR, but only on these states:
My reasoning was: the author want so to have feedback when she opens the PR in the first place and when it is converted from draft -> full PR.