Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V2.2.0 #157

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 22, 2016
Merged

V2.2.0 #157

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 22, 2016

Conversation

doug-martin
Copy link
Contributor

Alex Tsibulya and others added 5 commits September 21, 2016 18:00
- Add a test for issue #150 to specify the expected behavior
- Mark it `skip` pending implementation
- Add a test for CRLF split between two buffers (a.k.a issue #150) to
  specify the expected behavior
- Mark it `skip` pending implementation
- Modify existing tests for `\r` row delimiter to specify the behavior
  in case of CR vs.CRLF ambiguity issue #150
- Mark them `skip` pending implementation
Modify the parser to
- parse CRLF as a single token
- keep the current line unparsed if it ends in CR and there's more data

This solves the issues #146 and #150 by ensuring that CRLF split by a
buffer boundary doesn't get treated as two row delimiters CR+LF
@doug-martin doug-martin merged commit 5ac838e into master Sep 22, 2016
@doug-martin doug-martin deleted the v2.2.0 branch December 15, 2019 23:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant