feat(jellyfish-api-core): implement refundHtlcAll

[cwkang1998]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Implements spv spv_refundhtlcall rpc call.

Which issue(s) does this PR fixes?:

Fixes part of #202

Additional comments?:

Need some confirmation with how the ain implementation of this rpc is. Right now ain's implementation returns an array of strings, containing only one string, shown here.

The rpc documentation from ain however shows that it returns a string txid, which is not the case.

This current implementation for jellyfish deals with this by simply taking the first element of the returned array.

Edit: This rpc now returns a string array, faithful to its ain implementation.

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit d7c9a05 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for jellyfishsdk ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	d7c9a05
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/jellyfishsdk/deploys/625feb4f078e9e0008abeee6
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1324--jellyfishsdk.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1324 (d7c9a05) into main (868b4b0) will increase coverage by 1.70%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1324      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.21%   89.91%   +1.70%     
==========================================
  Files         348      350       +2     
  Lines       10030    10115      +85     
  Branches     1224     1244      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits         8848     9095     +247     
+ Misses       1113      966     -147     
+ Partials       69       54      -15     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/jellyfish-api-core/src/category/spv.ts	86.66% <100.00%> (+0.62%)	⬆️
packages/jellyfish-wallet-encrypted/src/hd_node.ts	12.12% <0.00%> (-87.88%)	⬇️
...kages/jellyfish-wallet-encrypted/src/encryption.ts	7.69% <0.00%> (-86.16%)	⬇️
apps/whale/src/module.database/_module.ts	78.57% <0.00%> (-21.43%)	⬇️
...le/src/module.indexer/model/dftx/composite.swap.ts	67.44% <0.00%> (-18.61%)	⬇️
...rc/module.api/interceptors/response.interceptor.ts	66.66% <0.00%> (-16.67%)	⬇️
...c/module.api/interceptors/exception.interceptor.ts	39.28% <0.00%> (-3.58%)	⬇️
packages/jellyfish-transaction/src/tx_composer.ts	78.33% <0.00%> (-1.67%)	⬇️
...s/legacy-api/src/controllers/PoolPairController.ts	96.26% <0.00%> (-0.84%)	⬇️
packages/jellyfish-api-core/src/index.ts	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 38 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 868b4b0...d7c9a05. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

Docker build preview for jellyfish/apps is ready!

Built with commit aaaa01d

• ghcr.io/defich/legacy-api:pr-1324
• ghcr.io/defich/ocean-api:pr-1324
• ghcr.io/defich/playground-api:pr-1324
• ghcr.io/defich/status-api:pr-1324

[canonbrother]

LGTM!!
(Regarding the return arr from ain.. if that does really matter.. we'd open issue on ain)

[ivan-zynesis]

LGTM!! (Regarding the return arr from ain.. if that does really matter.. we'd open issue on ain)

Hmm prefer to return array instead for consistencies. I am thinking if ain side is a bug, what if the wallet has multiple htlc, then it should return txid of each refunded.

[cwkang1998]

LGTM!! (Regarding the return arr from ain.. if that does really matter.. we'd open issue on ain)

Hmm prefer to return array instead for consistencies. I am thinking if ain side is a bug, what if the wallet has multiple htlc, then it should return txid of each refunded.

Does make sense that it'll want to return all the transactions made for the refund. But not sure when ain will implement this.

If so then I think I'll make it return a string array, but I'll just note it somewhere that there is this inconsistency then.