-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BHoM_UI: tags and local settings #215
Comments
Is that something we would like to resurrect @FraserGreenroyd? |
I think so, I've been discussing similar with @travispotterBH recently on similar things - so yeah let's keep this one open and assign it to me, I'll tackle it in a milestone or so. |
Great - thanks both - I agree worth relooking at and prioritising if we can - as anything that can improve the discoverability of most useful methods in the code for different users will be massive |
Yeah - I would support it even more now when the Revit UI starts getting crowdy very quickly 👍 |
See this branch for initial work. |
There's a branch with the same name on Grasshopper_UI repository to help test this, but I won't be raising the PRs together I don't think, as the Grasshopper implementation/access to the settings being introduced by the branch on this repository will need more work. Neither PR may come this milestone depending on how it goes over the weekend/early next week as there is a bit more to do to make it a bit tidier before going to a full review. |
… into BHoM_UI-#215-Settings
… into BHoM_UI-#215-Settings
Description:
Following the discussion with @al-fisher and @kThorsager, I am writing down the ideas for UI improvements that we came up with:
Method tags, possibly really helpful to identify methods that are e.g. related to a certain workflow. These could be divided into:
Plus @al-fisher's idea: a ❤️ button to mark favourite methods
A window with data tree, where the user could check/uncheck each assembly/method to include or remove it from the search (better UX plus faster search?)
To be compared against #85
Suggestions and thoughts are welcome!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: