Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add net8.0 target #2108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2023
Merged

add net8.0 target #2108

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2023

Conversation

westin-m
Copy link
Contributor

@westin-m westin-m commented Jun 8, 2023

Put CustomKey and a custom converter for SecurityKey in TestUtils, transition aot test to net8.0

build/dependencies.props Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jennyf19
Copy link
Collaborator

jennyf19 commented Jun 8, 2023

#if NET45

If we no longer have net45 support do we need the NET45 ifdefs?


Refers to: src/Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens/AsymmetricSignatureProvider.cs:190 in d37cb32. [](commit_id = d37cb32, deletion_comment = False)

@jennyf19
Copy link
Collaborator

jennyf19 commented Jun 8, 2023

using Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens;

nit: add license info


Refers to: test/Microsoft.IdentityModel.TestUtils/CustomSecurityKey.cs:1 in d37cb32. [](commit_id = d37cb32, deletion_comment = False)

@jennyf19
Copy link
Collaborator

jennyf19 commented Jun 8, 2023

#if NET8_0_OR_GREATER

nit: add license info


Refers to: test/Microsoft.IdentityModel.TestUtils/SecurityKeyCustomConverter.cs:1 in d37cb32. [](commit_id = d37cb32, deletion_comment = False)

Copy link
Collaborator

@jennyf19 jennyf19 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🕐

@westin-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

westin-m commented Jun 8, 2023

If we no longer have net45 support do we need the NET45 ifdefs?

No, probably not. That's about 29 more files; should this be its own PR?


In reply to: 1583577448

@jennyf19
Copy link
Collaborator

jennyf19 commented Jun 8, 2023

Yes. let's do a separate PR. Please open an issue in wilson for tracking and link to the previous PR for removing the target as well. thanks! sorry to have just noticed that.


In reply to: 1583577448

Copy link
Contributor

@jmprieur jmprieur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I've not tried locally
I've added a few suggestions

build/commonTest.props Show resolved Hide resolved
build/targets.props Show resolved Hide resolved
build/targetsTest.props Show resolved Hide resolved
add net8.0 target

Put CustomKey and a custom converter for SecurityKey in TestUtils,
transition aot test to net8.0
@westin-m westin-m merged commit 3ffa857 into dev7x Jun 9, 2023
brentschmaltz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2023
add net8.0 target

Put CustomKey and a custom converter for SecurityKey in TestUtils,
transition aot test to net8.0
brentschmaltz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2023
add net8.0 target

Put CustomKey and a custom converter for SecurityKey in TestUtils,
transition aot test to net8.0
brentschmaltz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2023
add net8.0 target

Put CustomKey and a custom converter for SecurityKey in TestUtils,
transition aot test to net8.0
brentschmaltz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
add net8.0 target

Put CustomKey and a custom converter for SecurityKey in TestUtils,
transition aot test to net8.0
brentschmaltz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2023
add net8.0 target

Put CustomKey and a custom converter for SecurityKey in TestUtils,
transition aot test to net8.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants