Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Add support for CI secret #3507

Merged
merged 73 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hundredacres
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Added CI secret and updated tests.

Pipeline Reference

Pipeline
avm.res.fabric.capacity

Type of Change

  • Update to CI Environment or utilities (Non-module affecting changes)
  • Azure Verified Module updates:
    • Bugfix containing backwards-compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in version.json:
      • Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes #{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
      • The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an issue to report it yet.
    • Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have bumped the MINOR version in version.json.
    • Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in version.json.
    • Update to documentation

Checklist

  • I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
  • I have run Set-AVMModule locally to generate the supporting module files.
  • My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without any errors or warnings

hundredacres and others added 30 commits March 25, 2024 10:42
This PR fixes the issue, that failed workflows were not assigned to the
correct owner
## Description

<!--
>Thank you for your contribution !
> Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
> Please also include the context.
> List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes Azure#1735
Closes Azure#1735

-->

## Pipeline Reference

<!-- Insert your Pipeline Status Badge below -->

| Pipeline |
| -------- |
|
[![avm.res.insights.webtest](https://github.com/JFolberth/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.insights.webtest.yml/badge.svg)](https://github.com/JFolberth/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.insights.webtest.yml)
|

## Type of Change

<!-- Use the check-boxes [x] on the options that are relevant. -->

- [ ] Update to CI Environment or utlities (Non-module effecting
changes)
- [ ] Azure Verified Module updates:
- [ ] Bugfix containing backwards compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT
bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in `version.json`:
- [ ] Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes
#{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
- [ ] The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an
issue to report it yet.
- [ ] Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have
bumped the MINOR version in `version.json`.
- [ ] Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in
`version.json`.
  - [x] Update to documentation

## Checklist

- [x] I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same
update/change
- [x] I have run `Set-AVMModule` locally to generate the supporting
module files.
- [x] My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without
any errors or warnings

<!-- Please keep up to day with the contribution guide at
https://aka.ms/avm/contribute/bicep -->
@hundredacres hundredacres requested review from a team as code owners October 10, 2024 22:08
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still label Oct 10, 2024

Important

The "Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed once the triage process is complete!

Tip

For additional guidance on how to triage this issue/PR, see the BRM Issue Triage documentation.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue label Oct 10, 2024

Important

If this is a module-related PR, being submitted by the sole owner of the module, the AVM core team must review and approve it (as module owners can't approve their own PRs).

To indicate this PR needs the core team''s attention, apply the "Needs: Core Team 🧞" label!

The core team will only review and approve PRs that have this label applied!

@avm-team-linter avm-team-linter bot added the Needs: Core Team 🧞 This item needs the AVM Core Team to review it label Oct 10, 2024
@eriqua eriqua added Class: Resource Module 📦 This is a resource module and removed Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still labels Oct 10, 2024
@eriqua eriqua mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024
12 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@eriqua eriqua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🆗

@eriqua eriqua merged commit cab8eda into Azure:main Oct 14, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Class: Resource Module 📦 This is a resource module Needs: Core Team 🧞 This item needs the AVM Core Team to review it Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants