Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-10-03-preview #21470

Closed

Conversation

azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

@azure-sdk azure-sdk commented Apr 19, 2022

Create to sync Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#26059
ReCreate this PR

Please install the package by npm install https://portal.azure-devex-tools.com/api/sdk-dl-pub?p=Azure/26059/azure-sdk-for-js/@azure_arm-hybridcompute/azure-arm-hybridcompute-4.0.0-beta.1.tgz

[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version stable/2022-03-10 (Azure#18458)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.HybridCompute from version preview/2021-12-10-preview to version 2022-03-10

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* updated the swagger

* fixed typo

* fixed examples

* fixed swagger issues

* removed columns

* fixed the x-ms-identifier format

* fixed the identifier again

* fixed the readme tag

* ran prettier * removed extra tag in the readme.md

* Update HybridCompute.json

updated serviceStatuses and agentConfiguration descriptions

* removed resources

* removed resources in the examples

* addressed issues

* ran prettier

* A small fix to the newly added field's name

* updated the az cli related files

Co-authored-by: Justin Chen <[email protected]>
@azure-sdk azure-sdk closed this Apr 19, 2022
@ghost ghost added the Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library. label Apr 19, 2022
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version stable/2022-03-10 [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2022-05-10-preview Jul 8, 2022
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2022-05-10-preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] Added osName to 2022-05-10-preview Jul 28, 2022
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] Added osName to 2022-05-10-preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2022-08-11-preview Oct 11, 2022
azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-js that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2022
changes to support secure communication for all providers (Azure#21470)
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2022-08-11-preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version stable/2022-11-10 Dec 15, 2022
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version stable/2022-11-10 [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] Dev hybridcompute microsoft.hybrid compute 2022 12 27 preview Jan 31, 2023
jeremymeng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2023
### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\communication\communication-common`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the
`sdk\communication\communication-common` made use of the arrow syntax
for callback functions. Mocha recommends not to do this because you lose
access to the mocha context (https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
   - **_I don't believe this is relevant._**
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
  - **_I don't believe this is necessary_**
jeremymeng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2023
### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\communication\communication-email`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the `sdk\communication\communication-email`
made use of the arrow syntax for callback functions. Mocha recommends
not to do this because you lose access to the mocha context
(https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package
#24746 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-common`
package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
   - **_I don't believe this is relevant._**
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
  - **_I don't believe this is necessary_**
petrsvihlik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2023
### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\communication\communication-identity`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the
`sdk\communication\communication-identity` made use of the arrow syntax
for callback functions. Mocha recommends not to do this because you lose
access to the mocha context (https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package
#24746 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-common`
package
#24747 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-email`
package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
   - **_I don't believe this is relevant._**
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
  - **_I don't believe this is necessary_**
anujissarMS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2023
### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\communication\communication-rooms`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the `sdk\communication\communication-rooms`
made use of the arrow syntax for callback functions. Mocha recommends
not to do this because you lose access to the mocha context
(https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package
#24746 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-common`
package
#24747 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-email`
package
#24797 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-identity`
package
#24799 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\communication\communication-job-router` package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
   - **_I don't believe this is relevant._**
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
  - **_I don't believe this is necessary_**
jeremymeng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
…s in test directory (#24865)

### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\communication\communication-job-router`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the
`sdk\communication\communication-job-router` made use of the arrow
syntax for callback functions. Mocha recommends not to do this because
you lose access to the mocha context
(https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package
#24746 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-common`
package
#24747 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-email`
package
#24797 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-identity`
package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
   - **_I don't believe this is relevant._**
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
  - **_I don't believe this is necessary_**
jeremymeng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\confidentialledger\confidential-ledger-rest`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the
`sdk\confidentialledger\confidential-ledger-rest` made use of the arrow
syntax for callback functions. Mocha recommends not to do this because
you lose access to the mocha context
(https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package
#24746 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-common`
package
#24747 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-email`
package
#24797 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-identity`
package
#24865 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\communication\communication-job-router` package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
   - **_I don't believe this is relevant._**
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
  - **_I don't believe this is necessary_**
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] Dev hybridcompute microsoft.hybrid compute 2022 12 27 preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-03-15-preview Apr 20, 2023
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-03-15-preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version stable/2022-12-27 Apr 25, 2023
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version stable/2022-12-27 [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-04-25-preview Jun 1, 2023
jeremymeng pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2023
### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\communication\communication-sms`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the `sdk\communication\communication-sms`
made use of the arrow syntax for callback functions. Mocha recommends
not to do this because you lose access to the mocha context
(https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package
#24746 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-common`
package
#24747 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-email`
package
#24797 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-identity`
package
#24800 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-rooms`
package
#24865 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\communication\communication-job-router` package
#25148 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\confidentialledger\confidential-ledger-rest` package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-04-25-preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to remove version preview/2023-04-25-preview Aug 8, 2023
dgetu pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
### Packages impacted by this PR

`sdk\communication\communication-sms`

### Issues associated with this PR

#13005 

### Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

The existing mocha tests for the `sdk\communication\communication-sms`
made use of the arrow syntax for callback functions. Mocha recommends
not to do this because you lose access to the mocha context
(https://mochajs.org/#arrow-functions).

### What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If
there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR
chosen?

The reason for utilizing the function keyword instead of an arrow syntax
to write the callback functions in these mocha tests is to maintain
access to the mocha context.

### Are there test cases added in this PR? _(If not, why?)_

No additional test cases were added in this PR as the change only
required modifying existing test cases.

### Provide a list of related PRs _(if any)_

#23761 - Same fix, but for the `sdk\search\search-documents` package
#23789 - Same fix but for the `sdk\attestation\attestation` package
#23835 - Same fix but for the `sdk\batch\batch` package
#23850 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitivelanguage\ai-language-conversations` package
#23881 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-authoring` package
#24126 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\cognitiveservices\cognitiveservices-luis-runtime` package
#21470 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-chat`
package
#24746 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-common`
package
#24747 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-email`
package
#24797 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-identity`
package
#24800 - Same fix but for the `sdk\communication\communication-rooms`
package
#24865 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\communication\communication-job-router` package
#25148 - Same fix but for the
`sdk\confidentialledger\confidential-ledger-rest` package

### Command used to generate this PR:**_(Applicable only to SDK release
request PRs)_

**_Not applicable_**

### Checklists
- [x] Added impacted package name to the issue description
- [ ] Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** _(If so,
create an Issue in the
[Autorest/typescript](https://github.com/Azure/autorest.typescript)
repository and link it here)_
- [ ] Added a changelog (if necessary)
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to remove version preview/2023-04-25-preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-06-20-preview Sep 11, 2023
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-06-20-preview [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] fix case sensitive naming Sep 13, 2023
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] fix case sensitive naming [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] fix casing for operation id Oct 16, 2023
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] fix casing for operation id [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] resolve flatten issue Oct 24, 2023
@azure-sdk azure-sdk changed the title [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] resolve flatten issue [ReleasePR @azure/arm-hybridcompute] [Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.HybridCompute to add version preview/2023-10-03-preview Nov 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Mgmt This issue is related to a management-plane library.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant