Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Automation] Generate Fluent Lite from iothub#package-2020-03 #21237

Closed

Conversation

azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

[Automation] Generate Fluent Lite from iothub#package-2020-03

@timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member

Regenerating this control plane SDK to account for a fix in the swagger here. However, it looks like the control plane SDK wasn't doing this validation anyways, so this update just brings in some comment updates from the swagger and some implementation detail changes.

Copy link
Member

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Java will not do pattern validation, also no validation happen for read-only properties.

@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
CertificateDescription.Update update();

/** The template for CertificateDescription update. */
interface Update extends UpdateStages.WithCertificate, UpdateStages.WithIfMatch {
interface Update extends UpdateStages.WithCertificate, UpdateStages.WithifMatch {
Copy link
Member

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft May 10, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I need to double check codegen on this. Seems should be WithIfMatch.withIfMatch.

Fixed in Azure/autorest.java#1020
I will generate it again, after codegen upgrade.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I'll hold off on merging until this gets regenerated

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix integrated to pipeline.

However you might want wait for a few days for azure-identity May release done.

@weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Member

Here is the newly generated PR #21383

@timtay-microsoft
Copy link
Member

I'll go ahead and close this PR then, since #21383 replaces it

azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-java that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2022
Release appcomplianceautomation microsoft.app compliance automation 2022 11 16 preview 1 (Azure#21074)

* add appcomplianceautomation specs

* update appcomplianceautomation specs for 2022-11-16-preview

* remove privatepreview and beta (Azure#21124)

Co-authored-by: Yanwen Liu <[email protected]>

* Release appcomplianceautomation microsoft.app compliance automation 2022 11 16 preview resolve comments 2 (Azure#21152)

* fix comments

* remove duplicate in body

* resolve comments

* edit examples to match schema

* fix failure

* fix model validation

* change passed to passedCount

* add x-ms-enum to isPass

* change delete 200 description

Co-authored-by: Yanwen Liu <[email protected]>

* set sasUri x-ms-secret to true (Azure#21161)

Co-authored-by: Yanwen Liu <[email protected]>

* remove properties from download request body (Azure#21184)

* remove properties from download request body

* remove properties in snapshot_resourcelist_download.json

* keep statuscode 201 and 202 in patch report response, due to RPSaas will change 202 to 201

* add body in patch report 201 response

Co-authored-by: Yanwen Liu <[email protected]>

* change ProvisioningState Cancelled to Canceled, and some descriptions (Azure#21237)

* change ProvisioningState Cancelled to Canceled, and some descriptions

* add x-ms-enum extension to ComplianceState

Co-authored-by: Yanwen Liu <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: Yanwen Liu <[email protected]>
@azure-sdk azure-sdk deleted the fluent-lite-generation-881617 branch October 19, 2023 00:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants