Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2023-03-01-preview arm review feedback #24404

Merged

Conversation

solankisamir
Copy link
Member

@solankisamir solankisamir commented Jun 12, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Note that this doesn't apply if you are trying to merge a PR that was previously in the private repository.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @solankisamir Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 12, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️🔄Breaking Change(Cross-Version) inProgress [Detail]
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.3) new version base version
    package-preview-2023-03 package-preview-2023-03(6db278d) package-preview-2023-03(release-Microsoft.ApiManagement-2023-03-01-preview)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L96
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 200 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L215
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 201 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L215
    PutRequestResponseSchemeArm A PUT operation request body schema should be the same as its 200 response schema, to allow reusing the same entity between GET and PUT. If the schema of the PUT request body is a superset of the GET response body, make sure you have a PATCH operation to make the resource updatable. Operation: 'Api_CreateOrUpdate' Request Model: 'parameters[3].schema' Response Model: 'responses[200].schema'
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L215
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L340
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L509
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L571
    RepeatedPathInfo The 'apiId' already appears in the path, please don't repeat it in the request body.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L708
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1279
    ParametersInPointGet Query parameter format should be removed. Point Get's MUST not have query parameters other than api version.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1356
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1583
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1742
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 201 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'create'.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1742
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L1858
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2202
    ParametersInPointGet Query parameter format should be removed. Point Get's MUST not have query parameters other than api version.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2282
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2506
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2555
    ParametersInPointGet Query parameter format should be removed. Point Get's MUST not have query parameters other than api version.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2634
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2852
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 200 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2970
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 201 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L2970
    LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3050
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3161
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3522
    ParametersInPointGet Query parameter expandCommentsAttachments should be removed. Point Get's MUST not have query parameters other than api version.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3600
    RepeatedPathInfo The 'apiId' already appears in the path, please don't repeat it in the request body.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3666
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 201 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'create'.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3691
    GetCollectionOnlyHasValueAndNextLink Get endpoints for collections of resources must only have the value and nextLink properties in their model.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L3886
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 201 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'create'.
    Location: Microsoft.ApiManagement/preview/2023-03-01-preview/apimapis.json#L4057
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 12, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️SDK Breaking Change Tracking warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]

    Only 0 items are rendered, please refer to log for more details.

    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @ghost ghost added the API Management label Jun 12, 2023
    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 12, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Swagger Microsoft.ApiManagement https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/6c6578d715e1429e826f3edaac27a093
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/apimanagement/armapimanagement https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/0d770de7eeb147379fa2b469867b9c84
    JavaScript @azure/arm-apimanagement https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/a72946de937843e4be00e1a807fadff8

    @solankisamir solankisamir added the 2023-03-01-preview APIM 2023-03-01-preview PRs label Jun 12, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @solankisamir, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @solankisamir, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @solankisamir
    Copy link
    Member Author

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @solankisamir solankisamir requested review from Mielek and harunrst June 13, 2023 22:19
    @solankisamir
    Copy link
    Member Author

    @zedy-wj can you take a look at the PR and merge it as soon as possible? Thanks

    @mikekistler mikekistler added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Jun 15, 2023
    @zedy-wj
    Copy link
    Member

    zedy-wj commented Jun 15, 2023

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @zedy-wj zedy-wj added the Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates label Jun 15, 2023
    @live1206 live1206 merged commit 548bf35 into release-Microsoft.ApiManagement-2023-03-01-preview Jun 15, 2023
    @live1206 live1206 deleted the 2023-arm-review branch June 15, 2023 06:29
    live1206 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2023
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ApiManagement from version preview/2022-09-01-preview to version 2023-03-01-preview
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * feat(apim): Provide capability to use custom hostname for Configuration API v2 (#23785)
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * feat(rp): Added flags to enable/disable portals (#23799)
    
    * feat(rp): Added flags to enable/disable portals
    
    * update default
    
    * feat(apim): Provide capability to disable legacy configuration API  (#23786)
    
    * feat(apim): Provide capability to disable legacy configuration API
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Update sample
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Fix type definition
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Switch to enum
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Update samples
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    ---------
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * feat(apim): Add new tracing API (#23800)
    
    * Add new tracing api
    
    * Remove TODOs descriptions
    
    * Improve descriptions
    
    * Fix dot
    
    * Add missing examples
    
    * prettier fixes
    
    * Fix model and semantic problems
    
    * Remove get prefix in post operations
    
    * Use list prefix
    
    * Fix PR comments
    
    * feat(apim): Add ability to create and update new OData api (#23849)
    
    * Add odata api definitions
    
    * add api usage example
    
    * fix file reference
    
    * address comments
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: rkolesnikov <[email protected]>
    
    * migration contract (#23983)
    
    * 2023 03 cred scan fix - Examples Only (#24357)
    
    * remove-sas-signature
    
    * update example
    
    * 2023-03-01-preview arm review feedback (#24404)
    
    * move to v5 subscription contract
    
    * move to v5 for rg and api-version
    
    * cred scan
    
    * default is true
    
    * uuid in examples
    
    * change from boolean to enums
    
    * fix default value
    
    ---------
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Harun Reşit <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Rafał Mielowski <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Roman Kolesnikov <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: rkolesnikov <[email protected]>
    harryli0108 pushed a commit to harryli0108/azure-rest-api-specs that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2023
    * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ApiManagement from version preview/2022-09-01-preview to version 2023-03-01-preview
    
    * Updates readme
    
    * Updates API version in new specs and examples
    
    * feat(apim): Provide capability to use custom hostname for Configuration API v2 (Azure#23785)
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * feat(rp): Added flags to enable/disable portals (Azure#23799)
    
    * feat(rp): Added flags to enable/disable portals
    
    * update default
    
    * feat(apim): Provide capability to disable legacy configuration API  (Azure#23786)
    
    * feat(apim): Provide capability to disable legacy configuration API
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Update sample
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Fix type definition
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Switch to enum
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * Update samples
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    ---------
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    
    * feat(apim): Add new tracing API (Azure#23800)
    
    * Add new tracing api
    
    * Remove TODOs descriptions
    
    * Improve descriptions
    
    * Fix dot
    
    * Add missing examples
    
    * prettier fixes
    
    * Fix model and semantic problems
    
    * Remove get prefix in post operations
    
    * Use list prefix
    
    * Fix PR comments
    
    * feat(apim): Add ability to create and update new OData api (Azure#23849)
    
    * Add odata api definitions
    
    * add api usage example
    
    * fix file reference
    
    * address comments
    
    ---------
    
    Co-authored-by: rkolesnikov <[email protected]>
    
    * migration contract (Azure#23983)
    
    * 2023 03 cred scan fix - Examples Only (Azure#24357)
    
    * remove-sas-signature
    
    * update example
    
    * 2023-03-01-preview arm review feedback (Azure#24404)
    
    * move to v5 subscription contract
    
    * move to v5 for rg and api-version
    
    * cred scan
    
    * default is true
    
    * uuid in examples
    
    * change from boolean to enums
    
    * fix default value
    
    ---------
    
    Signed-off-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Tom Kerkhove <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Harun Reşit <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Rafał Mielowski <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: Roman Kolesnikov <[email protected]>
    Co-authored-by: rkolesnikov <[email protected]>
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    2023-03-01-preview APIM 2023-03-01-preview PRs API Management Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates Approved-SdkBreakingChange-JavaScript BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript CI-FixRequiredOnFailure resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    6 participants