Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PostgreSQL] Fix S360 violations for postgresql flexible servers api version 2022-12-01 #24062

Merged

Conversation

ambrahma
Copy link
Member

@ambrahma ambrahma commented May 19, 2023

Fix S360 violations for postgresql flexible servers api version 2022-12-01

Breaking change review: https://msazure.visualstudio.com/One/_workitems/edit/23531356

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • [X ] update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Note that this doesn't apply if you are trying to merge a PR that was previously in the private repository.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

…o be part of read operation, as this field is returned for replica servers
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @ambrahma Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2023

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 3 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
    FlexibleServers.json 2023-03-01-preview(7114320) 2023-03-01-preview(main)
    FlexibleServers.json 2022-12-01(7114320) 2022-12-01(main)
    Rule Message
    1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
    New: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L514:9
    Old: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L513:9
    1045 - AddedOptionalProperty The new version has a new optional property 'tenantId' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L897:7
    Old: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L897:7
    1045 - AddedOptionalProperty The new version has a new optional property 'tenantId' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L814:7
    Old: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L812:7
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.2) new version base version
    package-flexibleserver-2022-12-01 package-flexibleserver-2022-12-01(7114320) package-flexibleserver-2022-12-01(main)
    package-flexibleserver-2023-03-01-preview package-flexibleserver-2023-03-01-preview(7114320) package-flexibleserver-2023-03-01-preview(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Rule Message
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 200 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L38
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 201 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L38
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L90
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPatch 200 response schema in long running PATCH operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PATCH operations 200 response schema must have ProvisioningState specified.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L170
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 200 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L38
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPut 201 response schema in long running PUT operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PUT operations response schema must have ProvisioningState specified for the 200 and 201 status codes.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L38
    PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L87
    ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLROPatch 200 response schema in long running PATCH operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO PATCH operations 200 response schema must have ProvisioningState specified.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L167
    ⚠️ ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLRODelete 200 response schema in long running DELETE operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO DELETE operations 200 response schema must have ProvisioningState specified.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L222
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/preview/2023-03-01-preview/FlexibleServers.json#L580
    ⚠️ ProvisioningStateSpecifiedForLRODelete 200 response schema in long running DELETE operation is missing ProvisioningState property. A LRO DELETE operations 200 response schema must have ProvisioningState specified.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L219
    ⚠️ SchemaDescriptionOrTitle Schema should have a description or title.
    Location: Microsoft.DBforPostgreSQL/stable/2022-12-01/FlexibleServers.json#L572
    ️⚠️Avocado: 1 Warnings warning [Detail]
    Rule Message
    ⚠️ MULTIPLE_API_VERSION The default tag contains multiple API versions swaggers.
    readme: specification/postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md
    tag: specification/postgresql/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2020-01-01
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

    Breaking Changes Tracking



    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 15589d6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:712
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 712 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to build sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] Breaking Changes: /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerKeyType Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerKeyType.SystemAssigned.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/postgresql/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql/src/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole.GeoSyncReplica.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/postgresql/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql/src/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole.Secondary.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/postgresql/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql/src/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole.SyncReplica.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/postgresql/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql/src/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.FlexibleServers.Models.PostgreSqlFlexibleServerReplicationRole.WalReplica.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/postgresql/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql/src/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(96,5): error : ApiCompat failed for '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/bin/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql/Debug/netstandard2.0/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.dll' [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/postgresql/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql/src/Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Code Generator Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 15589d6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.5.1 -> 9.6.7
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.6.7>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] warning | PreCheck/PropertyRedeclarationWarning | Schema 'FirewallRule' has a property 'systemData' that is already declared the parent schema 'Resource' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from FirewallRule
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] warning | PreCheck/PropertyRedeclarationWarning | Schema 'Server' has a property 'systemData' that is already declared the parent schema 'Resource' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from Server
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] fatal   | Error: 1 errors occured -- cannot continue.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] fatal   | Process() cancelled due to failure
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error   | Batch/Error | Failure during batch task - {"tag":"package-flexibleserver-2023-03-01-preview"}  -- Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error   |   Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error   | Autorest completed with an error. If you think the error message is unclear, or is a bug, please declare an issues at https://github.com/Azure/autorest/issues with the error message you are seeing.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] warning | PreCheck/PropertyRedeclarationWarning | Schema 'FirewallRule' has a property 'systemData' that is already declared the parent schema 'Resource' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from FirewallRule
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] warning | PreCheck/PropertyRedeclarationWarning | Schema 'Server' has a property 'systemData' that is already declared the parent schema 'Resource' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from Server
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] fatal   | Error: 1 errors occured -- cannot continue.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] fatal   | Process() cancelled due to failure
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error   | Batch/Error | Failure during batch task - {"tag":"package-flexibleserver-2023-03-01-preview"}  -- Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error   |   Error: Plugin prechecker reported failure.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest] error   | Autorest completed with an error. If you think the error message is unclear, or is a bug, please declare an issues at https://github.com/Azure/autorest/issues with the error message you are seeing.
      cmdout	[automation_generate.sh] [Autorest]/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/venv-sdk/auto_temp.json does not exist!!!Error happened during codegen
      error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-sdk-for-python]: sh scripts/automation_generate.sh
      warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 15589d6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/postgresql/armpostgresql [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Other Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 0 additive change(s).
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/postgresql/armpostgresqlflexibleservers [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - `IdentityTypeSystemAssigned` from enum `IdentityType` has been removed
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Network` in struct `ServerPropertiesForUpdate`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `TenantID` in struct `UserAssignedIdentity`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 1 breaking change(s), 2 additive change(s).
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-js warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 15589d6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
      warn	No package detected after generation
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 15589d6. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh]  old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️postgresql [View full logs]  [Release Schema Changes]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Pipeline Framework Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 15589d6. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
      SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
      Error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    • ️✔️Az.postgresql.DefaultTag [View full logs
      error	Fatal error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
      error	The following packages are still pending:
      error		Az.postgresql.DefaultTag
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented May 19, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/postgresql/armpostgresqlflexibleservers https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/feefedd8c8d449cd9a755ca8b05ed5f3
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.PostgreSql https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/21c9787b890a4231ac96cf200554c092
    Java azure-resourcemanager-postgresqlflexibleserver https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/aca5fb4d5b3f402bb89a43bf26a11c8c

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    The automation detected this Pull Request introduces breaking changes to an existing API version and hence it added the NewApiVersionRequired label. This means you cannot proceed with merging this PR until you complete one of the following action items:

    - A) Submit a new PR instead of this one, or modify this PR, so that it introduces a new API version instead of introducing breaking changes to an existing API version. The automation will remove the label once it detects there are no more breaking changes.
    - B) OR you can request an approval of the breaking changes, get it reviewed, and approved. The reviewer will add Approved-BreakingChange label if they approve.

    For additional guidance, please see https://aka.ms/NewApiVersionRequired

    ambrahma added 2 commits May 19, 2023 14:41
    … PUT. Add missing sourceServerResourceId in response for replica operation
    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required and removed NewApiVersionRequired labels May 22, 2023
    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @ambrahma, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review.
    Action: To initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
    If you want to know the production traffic statistic, please see ARM Traffic statistic.
    If you think it is false positive breaking change, please provide the reasons in the PR comment, report to Swagger Tooling Team via https://aka.ms/swaggerfeedback.
    Note: To avoid breaking change, you can refer to Shift Left Solution for detecting breaking change in early phase at your service code repository.

    @ambrahma ambrahma marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2023 07:01
    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label May 22, 2023
    @ankhyk ankhyk added the Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates label May 23, 2023
    @ankhyk ankhyk removed the Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates label May 23, 2023
    @ambrahma
    Copy link
    Member Author

    azp /run

    @ambrahma
    Copy link
    Member Author

    /azp run

    @azure-pipelines
    Copy link

    Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

    @ankhyk
    Copy link
    Contributor

    ankhyk commented May 23, 2023

    @msyyc please take a look at python SDK breaking change

    @msyyc
    Copy link
    Member

    msyyc commented May 24, 2023

    Python generation failure is not caused by this PR and will be fixed by #24087.

    @ankhyk ankhyk added the Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates label May 24, 2023
    @ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang merged commit 15589d6 into main May 24, 2023
    @ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang deleted the ambrahma/fix-s360-postrgresql-flexible-server-2022-12-01 branch May 24, 2023 07:10
    ghost pushed a commit to Azure/azure-resource-manager-schemas that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required CI-BreakingChange-Go PostgreSQL resource-manager
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    8 participants