-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Haitao/secured by perimeter0702 #19873
Haitao/secured by perimeter0702 #19873
Conversation
Hi, @haitch Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
Swagger Validation Report
|
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.6)] | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
managedClusters.json | 2022-07-02-preview(dcf5823) | 2022-06-01(main) |
managedClusters.json | 2022-07-02-preview(dcf5823) | 2022-06-02-preview(main) |
The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:
Rule | Message |
---|---|
The new version has a different format than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3468:9 Old: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-06-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3378:9 |
|
The new version has a different format than the previous one. New: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3468:9 Old: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-06-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3378:9 |
️⚠️
LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) | new version | base version |
---|---|---|
package-preview-2022-07 | package-preview-2022-07(dcf5823) | package-preview-2022-07(dev-containerservice-Microsoft.ContainerService-2022-07-02-preview) |
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R4010 - RequiredDefaultResponse |
The response is defined but without a default error response implementation.Consider adding it.' Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1285 |
R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema |
The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.ContainerService/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L37 |
R4035 - PrivateEndpointResourceSchemaValidation |
The private endpoint model 'PrivateLinkResourcesListResult' schema does not conform to the common type definition. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L5566 |
Per the Noun_Verb convention for Operation Ids, the noun 'AgentPools' should not appear after the underscore. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1268 |
|
'PUT' operation 'PrivateEndpointConnections_Update' should use method name 'Create'. Note: If you have already shipped an SDK on top of this spec, fixing this warning may introduce a breaking change. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1716 |
|
The operation 'ManagedClusters_GetCommandResult' returns 202 status code, which indicates a long running operation, please enable 'x-ms-long-running-operation. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L2028 |
|
A LRO Post operation with return schema must have 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' extension enabled. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1817 |
|
A LRO Post operation with return schema must have 'x-ms-long-running-operation-options' extension enabled. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1971 |
|
Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateEndpointConnections_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1621 |
|
Based on the response model schema, operation 'PrivateLinkResources_List' might be pageable. Consider adding the x-ms-pageable extension. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1878 |
|
OperationId should contain the verb: 'listcredential' in:'ManagedClusters_GetAccessProfile'. Consider updating the operationId Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L244 |
|
OperationId should contain the verb: 'resolveprivatelinkserviceid' in:'ResolvePrivateLinkServiceId_POST'. Consider updating the operationId Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L1925 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'agentPools' with immediate parent 'ManagedCluster', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3578 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'commandResults' with immediate parent 'ManagedCluster', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3950 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'privateEndpointConnections' with immediate parent 'ManagedCluster', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L5470 |
|
The child tracked resource, 'trustedAccessRoleBindings' with immediate parent 'ManagedCluster', must have a list by immediate parent operation. Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L6783 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableAutoScaling Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3328 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableNodePublicIP Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3380 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableCustomCATrust Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3385 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableEncryptionAtHost Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3442 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableUltraSSD Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3447 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableFIPS Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3451 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableCSIProxy Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3627 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L3645 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableMultipleStandardLoadBalancers Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L4118 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L4181 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableRBAC Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L4341 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enablePodSecurityPolicy Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L4345 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableNamespaceResources Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L4349 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: disableLocalAccounts Location: Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json#L4508 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️⚠️
SDK Track2 Validation: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
- "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/dcf5823770a34ec45a82cd6402d01963e144f676/specification/containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-preview-2022-07">containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md#package-preview-2022-07
Rule | Message |
---|---|
"readme":"containerservice/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-preview-2022-07", "details":"Security scheme azure_auth is unknown and will not be processed. Only supported types are AADToken, AzureKey, Anonymous" |
️️✔️
PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Hi @haitch, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of
|
Hi @haitch, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
.../resource-manager/Microsoft.ContainerService/preview/2022-07-02-preview/managedClusters.json
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Also I thought that this API version wasn't going to get merged to main until @FumingZhang merged in on the 31st? |
Yes, @haitch please set the target branch to |
Swagger pipeline started successfully. If there is ApiView generated, it will be updated in this comment. |
e5daa43
into
dev-containerservice-Microsoft.ContainerService-2022-07-02-preview
…02-preview (Azure#20062) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.ContainerService from version preview/2022-06-02-preview to version 2022-07-02-preview * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * update readmes (Azure#19872) * Add example of Azure KeyVault Secrets Provider Addon for 2022-07-02-preview (Azure#19874) * add example of kv secret provider addon * fix * fix lint * move ADH GA type to preview (Azure#19904) * move ADH GA type to preview * fix prettier check issue * add overlay vpa swagger (Azure#19936) * add overlay vpa objects * fix typo * address comments Co-authored-by: zhifanhui <[email protected]> * Swagger API for Operation Abort (Azure#19971) * Swagger API for Operation Abort * Swagger changes updates for Abort operation based on validations * Haitao/secured by perimeter0702 (Azure#19873) * add SecuredByPerimeter in publicNetworkAccess * update enum value descriptions * Add support for ImageCleaner on AKS (Azure#19916) * Add support for ImageCleaner on AKS * add more context in ImageCleaner description * add default for availableAgentPoolVersions (Azure#19902) * Add Azure Monitor Metrics (Prometheus) Profile (Azure#19965) * Add Azure Monitor Metrics (Prometheus) Profile * spelling error * restructure to names from rp * commit to rerun build * ksm metrics Co-authored-by: Jianping Zeng <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: huizhifan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhifanhui <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: InduSridhar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Haitao Chen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: jiashun0011 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: bragi92 <[email protected]>
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following appy to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you are using OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. More details, refer to the wiki.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.