[Hub Generated] Review request for Microsoft.Consumption to add version stable/2019-11-01 #13414
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The PR for adding new version 2019-11-01 took longer than expected to be approved, so some fixes made in 10-01 were not included in 2019-11-01 version. The missing changes were the following PRs: #12777 #12555 #13039 #13097 #12822 #13280 #12942 #13248 #13378 This PR is to add those corrections to 2019-11-01 version
Swagger Validation Report
|
| Rule | Message |
|---|---|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'MeterDetails' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'UsageDetailsListResult' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'LegacyUsageDetailProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ModernUsageDetailProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReservationSummariesListResult' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReservationSummaryProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReservationDetailsListResult' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReservationDetailProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReservationRecommendationDetailsProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
|
| "readme":"consumption/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2019-11", "details":"The schema 'ReservationRecommendationDetailsCalculatedSavingsProperties' with an undefined type and decalared properties is a bit ambigious. This has been auto-corrected to 'type:object'" |
️️✔️[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
|
Hi, @octalimon Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
|
Hi @octalimon, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
|
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
This was referenced Mar 15, 2021
This was referenced Mar 15, 2021
|
The version 2019-11-01 was published just last week, it was based on 2019-10-01, however the PR took too long to get approved and we missed some PR that were pushed to version 2019-10-01 All of these changes were already approved for 2019-10-01 version, the PRs are: #12777 We had s360 item that the 2019-11-01 was missing, that is why we added it. |
PhoenixHe-NV
added
the
Approved-BreakingChange
PhoenixHe-NV
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2021
This was referenced Mar 16, 2021
This was referenced Mar 16, 2021
MirzaSikander
pushed a commit
to MirzaSikander/azure-rest-api-specs
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2021
The PR for adding new version 2019-11-01 took longer than expected to be approved, so some fixes made in 10-01 were not included in 2019-11-01 version. The missing changes were the following PRs: Azure#12777 Azure#12555 Azure#13039 Azure#13097 Azure#12822 Azure#13280 Azure#12942 Azure#13248 Azure#13378 This PR is to add those corrections to 2019-11-01 version
mkarmark
pushed a commit
to mkarmark/azure-rest-api-specs
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2021
The PR for adding new version 2019-11-01 took longer than expected to be approved, so some fixes made in 10-01 were not included in 2019-11-01 version. The missing changes were the following PRs: Azure#12777 Azure#12555 Azure#13039 Azure#13097 Azure#12822 Azure#13280 Azure#12942 Azure#13248 Azure#13378 This PR is to add those corrections to 2019-11-01 version
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a PR generated at OpenAPI Hub. You can view your work branch via this link.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.