Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update preview to main #2311

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Mar 2, 2022
Merged

Update preview to main #2311

merged 34 commits into from
Mar 2, 2022

Conversation

dylanbulfinMS
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • I added or modified the existing tests to cover the change (we do not allow our test coverage to go down).
  • This pull-request is submitted against the main branch.

Description of the changes

Reference/Link to the issue solved with this PR (if any)

jamdavi and others added 30 commits December 7, 2021 18:55
…arious clients (#2248)

Update our code docs to better explain proxy settings
* fix(iot-svc): update debug assert

* Temporarily disable import devices/configs test (#2263)

* fix(iot-svc): update debug assert

* Reduce modules in ModulesClient_GetModulesOnDevice to 2
…esher disposal. (#2260)

* Fix issue with AMQP connection pool

* Dispose the connection holder appropriately

* Add unit testing capability to connection pool
* Added types for different credentials

* Altered code to work with new types

* Fixed Managers

* removed unneeded #if !NET451

* Filled in method summaries

* refactored GetHeaderProvider

* Added documentation

* Formatting fixes to address comments
* Fix doc comment list bullets

* Change to use description tag
* Update RegistryManager instantiation doc comments

* Update other service client doc comments.
jamdavi and others added 3 commits February 15, 2022 10:13
#2309)

* Update to Azure.Core 1.22.0 to update dependency on System.Text.Encodings.Web

* Update readme.md typo

* Update readme.md for patch 4 of latest LTS
@dylanbulfinMS
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@dylanbulfinMS
Copy link
Contributor Author

/azp run

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

Copy link
Contributor

@drwill-ms drwill-ms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only changes we should be seeing are those you've made in your feature branch.

Also, the feature branch should be named more specifically, like previews/dps-rbac.

@dylanbulfinMS
Copy link
Contributor Author

dylanbulfinMS commented Mar 2, 2022

The only changes we should be seeing are those you've made in your feature branch.

Also, the feature branch should be named more specifically, like previews/dps-rbac.

This PR is meant to be the one updating preview from master, not to merge my feature branch into preview

@abhipsaMisra
Copy link
Member

As a part of previews/feature to preview merge, we perform the following steps:

  1. Bring changes from main to previews/feature

Checkout a branch from previews/feature branch
Git merge main
Resolve conflicts
Send a PR
Create a merge commit to previews/feature branch

  1. Bring changes from main to preview

Checkout a branch from preview branch
Git merge main
Resolve conflicts
Send a PR
Create a merge commit to preview branch

  1. Bring previews/feature into preview

Git checkout preview
Git checkout -b /featureToPreview
Git merge feature
Git push --set-upstream origin /featureToPreview
PR comparing /featureToPreview and preview
Squash and merge

1 can be treated as optional. It is recommended when the previews/feature branch is expected to hang around for a while and might benefit from the updates being made in main.

If I'm not mistaken, this PR is meant to address (2). Is that correct @dylanbulfinMS ?

@dylanbulfinMS dylanbulfinMS merged commit b1caf77 into preview Mar 2, 2022
@dylanbulfinMS dylanbulfinMS deleted the dbulfin/preview branch March 2, 2022 19:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants