-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update circuits.js tests and run in CI #167
Conversation
Have some similar changes + fixes in #172 maybe we should merge into here? |
If you think this one is good, I'd merge to master first, and then get yours on top of it on master. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than the formatting, looks good to me.
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ jobs: | |||
name: "Build and test" | |||
command: build foundation | |||
|
|||
aztec-js: | |||
aztec-js: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems to be a typo. The space should not be there.
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should probably add yarn formatting
as a preCommit
step
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm I'm running the formatter in circuits.js locally and it's not complaining, and the CI is not reporting any warnings either (see here).
~/Projects/aztec3-packages/yarn-project/circuits.js (palla/circuits-tests-ci)$ yarn formatting
Checking formatting...
All matched files use Prettier code style!
* feat: partial logic to check existence of vk in contract tree (missing merkle tree membership calls) * fix private call data * perform sibling-path traversal/hashing to get from VKhash/function-leaf all the way to function root and then to contract root --------- Co-authored-by: dbanks12 <[email protected]>
* feat: partial logic to check existence of vk in contract tree (missing merkle tree membership calls) * fix private call data * perform sibling-path traversal/hashing to get from VKhash/function-leaf all the way to function root and then to contract root --------- Co-authored-by: dbanks12 <[email protected]>
* feat: partial logic to check existence of vk in contract tree (missing merkle tree membership calls) * fix private call data * perform sibling-path traversal/hashing to get from VKhash/function-leaf all the way to function root and then to contract root --------- Co-authored-by: dbanks12 <[email protected]>
Fixes some circuits tests, skips others, and adds them to CI