You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Need to consider web browser compatibility of aztec.js & its dependencies.
In the past we've used Buffer polyfills but these are infamously slow.
Would it be worth switching to a more modern JS API like TypedArray or ArrayBuffer?
Probably more cases of non browser-compatible code, Buffer is the most obvious one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
# Description
Fixes#1059
# Checklist:
- [ ] I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line.
- [ ] Every change is related to the PR description.
- [ ] I have
[linked](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue)
this pull request to the issue(s) that it resolves.
- [ ] There are no unexpected formatting changes, superfluous debug
logs, or commented-out code.
- [ ] The branch has been merged or rebased against the head of its
merge target.
- [ ] I'm happy for the PR to be merged at the reviewer's next
convenience.
Need to consider web browser compatibility of aztec.js & its dependencies.
In the past we've used
Buffer
polyfills but these are infamously slow.Would it be worth switching to a more modern JS API like
TypedArray
orArrayBuffer
?Probably more cases of non browser-compatible code,
Buffer
is the most obvious one.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: