-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fuse IO stressbench hardening #14540
Comments
Thoughts from @ssz1997
|
@LuQQiu hi, when I used alluxxio memeory cache, the speed, is same with disk memory, why? Can you help what wrong my command is:( use alluxio fuse to write/read)
when I used disk memory query is 3.3s when i used emory cache is 3.31s why? |
Should not error out. FYI @ssz1997 |
That error is strange, that IOException should be caught by Files.createDirectories
|
|
@LuQQiu Is there another way other than using |
The error is fixed by #14742 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
seems like FIO is a more popular way of testing, close it for now |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Fuse IO stressbench according to users including @maobaolong has some limitations
it requires
Describe the solution you'd like
Hardening the Fuse IO stressbench to make it more user-friendly
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Urgency
Explain why the feature is important
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: