Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fuse bug/improvements/feature collection place #14304

Open
LuQQiu opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Fuse bug/improvements/feature collection place #14304

LuQQiu opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
@LuQQiu
Labels
stale The PR/Issue does not have recent activities and will be closed automatically type-debt This issue is about tech debt

Comments

@LuQQiu
Copy link
Contributor

LuQQiu commented Oct 25, 2021 •
edited
Loading

A central place to collect the Fuse bugs, improvements, and feature requests.
Please directly link related issues here
@LuQQiu LuQQiu added the type-debt This issue is about tech debt label Oct 25, 2021
@LuQQiu LuQQiu self-assigned this Oct 25, 2021
@LuQQiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

LuQQiu commented Oct 25, 2021 •
edited by yuzhu
Loading

#14276 Worker Fuse doesn't have resource constraint
#12758 Support libfuse 3.X in JNI-Fuse
#1795 Alluxio Fuse对接NFS
#14007 when serval process read the same file,it will be slow using jni fuse

#14282 NFS Fuse showing 0% cached.

@jayzhenghan
Copy link
Contributor

jayzhenghan commented Nov 15, 2021 •
edited
Loading

背景：
用户通过jnifuse 读取100MB未缓存的文件，花费了20s，开启direct io后花费了1s。
但是通过一些资料我发现社区不推荐jni + direct io的模式，同时jnr + direct io模式也有问题，这样的话，是不是说明我们alluxio fuse就用不了direct io呢？
image
jnr + direct io看社区评论说是因为jnr本身的问题，那么jni + direct io在高io情况下是goosefs的问题呢还是jni问题呢？可修复吗？
以及像上述这种情况有没有推荐的优化方式，尝试过preread，但是会带来随机读的读放大问题
@LuQQiu

@LuQQiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

LuQQiu commented Nov 18, 2021

Improve Fuse IO stressbench (test framework)
#14540
#14539

@LuQQiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

LuQQiu commented Nov 18, 2021

Support large file pre-read
#14541

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale The PR/Issue does not have recent activities and will be closed automatically label Jan 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@LuQQiu LuQQiu

Labels
stale The PR/Issue does not have recent activities and will be closed automatically type-debt This issue is about tech debt
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@LuQQiu @jayzhenghan