Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ACS-6620] Use extensions instead of content key for viewer extensions #3610

Merged

Conversation

MichalKinas
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x")

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behaviour? (You can also link to an open issue here)

Viewer extension config uses content key to get viewer extensions.

What is the new behaviour?

Config, schema and dosc has been updated to use extensions key instead. https://alfresco.atlassian.net/browse/ACS-6620

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x")

  • Yes
  • No

If this PR contains a breaking change, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications: ...

Other information:

@MichalKinas MichalKinas force-pushed the bugfix/mkinas-ACS-6620-adf-viewer-extensions-update branch from 5ad43fd to 969645d Compare January 25, 2024 21:45
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@MichalKinas MichalKinas merged commit 3f04f05 into develop Jan 25, 2024
27 checks passed
@MichalKinas MichalKinas deleted the bugfix/mkinas-ACS-6620-adf-viewer-extensions-update branch January 25, 2024 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants