-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Tighten invitation proposal patterns #6475
Conversation
48b0552
to
271f25d
Compare
7fe7b4c
to
2572b44
Compare
271f25d
to
052608e
Compare
2572b44
to
61e619c
Compare
Reviewers, especially for the occurrences of |
052608e
to
6108ad2
Compare
b7fd28c
to
30f1a1f
Compare
6108ad2
to
3b7f81d
Compare
30f1a1f
to
9165c33
Compare
3b7f81d
to
822e0e0
Compare
9165c33
to
5910533
Compare
822e0e0
to
14f61e6
Compare
5910533
to
5dee4d6
Compare
14f61e6
to
51dbd75
Compare
5dee4d6
to
c2e8a4f
Compare
51dbd75
to
59b5061
Compare
c2e8a4f
to
55b5868
Compare
59b5061
to
babdfcb
Compare
55b5868
to
2527e69
Compare
M.splitRecord({ | ||
give: { In: stableAmountShape }, | ||
want: M.or({ Out: anchorAmountShape }, {}), | ||
multiples: 1n, | ||
exit: M.any(), | ||
}), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This now represents all the fields of the record, not just a subset. Thus, the M.splitRecord
should be removed and the record pattern should be the proposalShape directly.
babdfcb
to
dda01a1
Compare
489d586
to
3fd944b
Compare
dda01a1
to
58585f3
Compare
872f99b
to
d6104d8
Compare
ab4733f
to
6011664
Compare
d6104d8
to
6b620ad
Compare
6011664
to
3c86bbe
Compare
6b620ad
to
1a4f7f3
Compare
3c86bbe
to
0b50061
Compare
1a4f7f3
to
8f7d674
Compare
abcd42a
to
c7cfdde
Compare
Closing in favor of #7041 |
Staged on #5422 "multiples"
Use tight proposal patterns on production invitations to, among other things, see if the Zoe prohibition on wash invitations is something we should bother preserving. (My assumption is not, but worth doing some of this experiment first.)