This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 9, 2021. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
0x-sra-client.py: Fix bug in config_order, and other small improvements #2399
0x-sra-client.py: Fix bug in config_order, and other small improvements #2399
Changes from 8 commits
0cd0e0b
298d02a
d713bcb
9f75d2f
06d8908
ceecd76
cb0be6b
a4bd546
1aea767
e247523
10f17d8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
small nit here - this path is relative to the directory the current process is in, and not relative to the directory the current file is in. I think you want the latter?
Example
If I ran..
LOC 114 would result in
/tmp/src/zero_ex/contract_wrappers/*/__init__.py
while I think you wanted it to be/tmp/path/to/monorepo/python-packages/contract_wrappers/src/zero_ex/contract_wrappers/*/__init__.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're absolutely right on this... but I don't think it's worth accommodating at this point. The script already generally lacks support for this type of interaction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup yup I agree