Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 7, 2020. It is now read-only.

Shuffle "about page" content #33

Open
aliburchard opened this issue Aug 24, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Shuffle "about page" content #33

aliburchard opened this issue Aug 24, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@aliburchard
Copy link
Contributor

HHMI is requesting the three subpages be: About, Lion Research, and Organizations, with the lion research team under Lion Research, with a mock-up of the split here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxNFAhD71pdXY2l5aE1sRWtLTlhFajZFUEFRb01aRVd4enI0

I personally also think we need an additional Team page as is standard on all our projects (that includes HHMI folks and Zooniverse team on the project) as this is still a collaboration. Thoughts?

@chrissnyder
Copy link
Contributor

Tentatively punting this til later, pending HHMI approval.

@DarrenMcRoy
Copy link

Just to add on, I don't support putting Zooniverse team members on the Team page. If you look at any of our old projects, you see that often 75% of the Zooniverse team members listed no longer work with Zooniverse... such things tend to become dated very quickly.

@chrislintott
Copy link
Member

I disagree; such pages credit people who did the work to build the project. It’s important to make our team visible.

On 25 Aug 2015, at 16:10, DarrenMcRoy [email protected] wrote:

Just to add on, I don't support putting Zooniverse team members on the Team page. If you look at any of our old projects, you see that often 75% of the Zooniverse team members listed no longer work with Zooniverse... such things tend to become dated very quickly.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #33 (comment).

@chrissnyder
Copy link
Contributor

Disagree, it's important we showcase the science team as it adds to the story we are trying to tell for the project. The Zooniverse team doesn't add to the narrative, gets outdated, and isn't necessary for credit as we can just point to Github.

@aliburchard aliburchard modified the milestone: Next Pass Aug 28, 2015
@srallen
Copy link
Contributor

srallen commented Aug 28, 2015

Perhaps a humans.txt file can be used to credit Zooniverse team?

@chrislintott
Copy link
Member

I don’t think that’s right. I think it’s important to show that developers are equal partners in the project, that there is creative work that’s important (and thus credited to individuals not faceless individuals) and last that it’s important our institutions are represented.

On 28 Aug 2015, at 12:50, Chris Snyder [email protected] wrote:

Disagree, it's important we showcase the science team as it adds to the story we are trying to tell for the project. The Zooniverse team doesn't add to the narrative, gets outdated, and isn't necessary for credit as we can just point to Github.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #33 (comment).

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants