Figure out what is the correct License to use for this repo

[anaulin]

As a placeholder, I added the Prosperity License to this repo, following the example of what we have for Convene.

Given that this repo is content-only, and stored in Wiki format, a different License might be more appropriate. Maybe that's a P2P license, or a CC one?

@zspencer I get the sense you've spent some time thinking about Licenses for Zinc's work. Can you advise?

[zspencer]

I like the Creative Commons set of licenses for content-heavy stuff; unless there's a cooperative-specific content-focused license.

[anaulin]

I've seen other coops and coop-adjacent entities use the Peer Production License, which seems to be a version of a Creative Commons license that allows free reuse to other commons-based / cooperative enterprises.

I think the Peer Production License feels like a good fit, unless we want to be extra-generous and allow re-use by commercial, non-commons-based entities.

Thoughts?

[anaulin]

tagging @colombene in case she has an opinion about this license issue

[colombene]

I don't have an opinion and don't know enough about those licenses yet.

[zspencer]

The Peer Production License looks like a great license for this particular repository! Thank you @anaulin!