test: improve v2 coverage #294
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe recent updates across several smart contracts introduce enhanced functionality and improved error handling. Key changes include the addition of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Contract
participant RoleManagement
User->>Contract: Call function (e.g., deposit)
Contract->>RoleManagement: Check for valid role (TSS_ROLE)
RoleManagement-->>Contract: Role validated
Contract->>Contract: Execute function logic
Contract-->>User: Return result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #294 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 68.97% 82.65% +13.67%
===========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 245 271 +26
Branches 61 85 +24
===========================================
+ Hits 169 224 +55
+ Misses 76 47 -29 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
skosito
requested review from
andresaiello,
brewmaster012,
lumtis,
CharlieMc0,
fadeev and
fbac
as code owners
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
v2/pkg/erc20custody.sol/erc20custody.go (2)
Line range hint
1-3:
Ensure adherence to Go best practices.The generated code should adhere to Go best practices, including proper error handling and naming conventions. Review the code for any potential improvements or refactoring opportunities.
Consider reviewing the generated code for adherence to Go best practices, such as error handling and naming conventions. While the code is generated, ensuring best practices can improve maintainability and readability.
Minimize usage of deprecated variables.
The deprecated variables
ERC20CustodyABIandERC20CustodyBinare still being used in thev2/pkg/erc20custody.sol/erc20custody.gofile. Consider replacing them withERC20CustodyMetaData.ABIandERC20CustodyMetaData.Binto adhere to the deprecation notice.
- File:
v2/pkg/erc20custody.sol/erc20custody.go
- Usage of
ERC20CustodyBinin contract deployment.Analysis chain
Line range hint
39-43:
Minimize usage of deprecated variables.The variables
ERC20CustodyABIandERC20CustodyBinare marked as deprecated. Ensure that their usage is minimized and replaced byERC20CustodyMetaData.ABIandERC20CustodyMetaData.Binwherever possible.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of deprecated variables. # Test: Check for occurrences of deprecated variables in the codebase. # Expect: Minimal usage or replacement with recommended alternatives. rg --type go 'ERC20CustodyABI|ERC20CustodyBin'Length of output: 1314
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (36)
- v2/pkg/erc20custody.sol/erc20custody.go (1 hunks)
- v2/pkg/gatewayevm.sol/gatewayevm.go (1 hunks)
- v2/pkg/gatewayevmupgradetest.sol/gatewayevmupgradetest.go (1 hunks)
- v2/pkg/gatewayzevm.sol/gatewayzevm.go (1 hunks)
- v2/pkg/igatewayevm.sol/igatewayevmerrors.go (1 hunks)
- v2/pkg/igatewayzevm.sol/igatewayzevmerrors.go (1 hunks)
- v2/pkg/senderzevm.sol/senderzevm.go (1 hunks)
- v2/pkg/zetaconnectorbase.sol/zetaconnectorbase.go (2 hunks)
- v2/pkg/zetaconnectornative.sol/zetaconnectornative.go (2 hunks)
- v2/pkg/zetaconnectornonnative.sol/zetaconnectornonnative.go (2 hunks)
- v2/src/evm/GatewayEVM.sol (9 hunks)
- v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorBase.sol (2 hunks)
- v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorNonNative.sol (5 hunks)
- v2/src/evm/interfaces/IGatewayEVM.sol (1 hunks)
- v2/src/zevm/GatewayZEVM.sol (11 hunks)
- v2/src/zevm/interfaces/IGatewayZEVM.sol (1 hunks)
- v2/test/ERC20Custody.t.sol (1 hunks)
- v2/test/GatewayEVM.t.sol (17 hunks)
- v2/test/GatewayZEVM.t.sol (13 hunks)
- v2/test/ZRC20.t.sol (7 hunks)
- v2/test/ZetaConnectorNative.t.sol (2 hunks)
- v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.sol (3 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorBase.ts (5 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorNative.ts (5 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorNonNative.ts (5 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/ERC20Custody__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVMEchidnaTest__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVMUpgradeTest__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVM__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayZEVM__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/IGatewayEVM.sol/IGatewayEVMErrors__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/IGatewayZEVM.sol/IGatewayZEVMErrors__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/SenderZEVM__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/ZetaConnectorBase__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/ZetaConnectorNative__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/ZetaConnectorNonNative__factory.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (156)
v2/typechain-types/factories/IGatewayEVM.sol/IGatewayEVMErrors__factory.ts (1)
17-21: Addition ofConnectorInitializederror type approved.The new error type
ConnectorInitializedhas been added to the ABI, enhancing error handling. This change is consistent with the existing error definitions.v2/typechain-types/factories/IGatewayZEVM.sol/IGatewayZEVMErrors__factory.ts (1)
32-36: Addition ofInsufficientZetaAmounterror type approved.The new error type
InsufficientZetaAmountenhances the error handling by providing more specific error reporting. This addition is consistent with the existing error definitions.v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorBase.sol (1)
31-32: Addition ofTSS_ROLEand its assignment in the constructor approved.The new role identifier
TSS_ROLEenhances the role management functionality. The constructor correctly assigns this role totssAddress_, ensuring proper role-based access control.Ensure that tests cover the role assignment logic to verify correct behavior.
Also applies to: 45-45
Verification successful
Verification of TSS_ROLE Assignment in Constructor
The constructor in
ZetaConnectorBase.solcorrectly assigns theTSS_ROLEtotssAddress_, ensuring proper role-based access control as intended. TheTSS_ROLEis defined and used appropriately in the file.
- Constructor Role Assignment: The constructor in
v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorBase.solincludes_grantRole(TSS_ROLE, tssAddress_);, confirming the role assignment logic is implemented.- TSS_ROLE Definition: The
TSS_ROLEis defined asbytes32 public constant TSS_ROLE = keccak256("TSS_ROLE");in the same file.The role assignment logic appears to be implemented correctly. Ensure that tests cover this logic to verify correct behavior.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the role assignment logic in the constructor. # Test: Search for constructor usage and role assignment. Expect: Correct assignment of TSS_ROLE. rg --type solidity -A 10 'constructor(address gateway_, address zetaToken_, address tssAddress_, address admin_)'Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ast-grep to find the constructor in the Solidity file and check for TSS_ROLE assignment ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern $'constructor(address gateway_, address zetaToken_, address tssAddress_, address admin_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 250
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the assignment of TSS_ROLE in the Solidity file ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern $'TSS_ROLE = keccak256("TSS_ROLE");'Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use grep to find the constructor in the Solidity file grep -A 10 'constructor(address gateway_, address zetaToken_, address tssAddress_, address admin_)' $(fd --type f --extension sol)Length of output: 4193
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use grep to search for the assignment of TSS_ROLE in the Solidity file grep 'TSS_ROLE = keccak256("TSS_ROLE");' $(fd --type f --extension sol)Length of output: 3819
v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorNonNative.sol (2)
118-121: LGTM! The_mintTofunction improves modularity.The refactoring centralizes the minting logic, enhancing code modularity and maintainability.
32-32: Verify the appropriateness ofTSS_ROLEforsetMaxSupply.The role requirement has been changed from
WITHDRAWER_ROLEtoTSS_ROLE. Ensure thatTSS_ROLEis the correct role for managing the maximum supply.Verification successful
TSS_ROLE is appropriate for
setMaxSupply.The role
TSS_ROLEis consistently used for access control across multiple contracts, indicating its suitability for managing permissions related tosetMaxSupply. This aligns with its intended purpose in the codebase.
v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorBase.sol: Definition ofTSS_ROLE.v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorNonNative.sol: Usage insetMaxSupply.v2/src/evm/GatewayEVM.sol: Similar access control usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the appropriateness of `TSS_ROLE` for `setMaxSupply`. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `TSS_ROLE` to ensure it's suitable for managing max supply. rg --type solidity 'TSS_ROLE'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the appropriateness of `TSS_ROLE` for `setMaxSupply`. # Corrected Test: Search for the definition and usage of `TSS_ROLE` in Solidity files. rg --type-add 'sol:.sol' --type sol 'TSS_ROLE'Length of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List Solidity files and search for `TSS_ROLE`. # List Solidity files to ensure they are present. fd --extension sol # Search for the definition and usage of `TSS_ROLE` in Solidity files. rg 'TSS_ROLE' --glob '*.sol'Length of output: 19610
v2/src/evm/interfaces/IGatewayEVM.sol (1)
73-73: Verify the usage context ofConnectorInitialized.The new error
ConnectorInitializedenhances error handling. Ensure it is appropriately used in the contract logic.Verification successful
ConnectorInitializedis used correctly in the contract logic.The
ConnectorInitializederror is defined inIGatewayEVM.soland is used inGatewayEVM.solto revert the transaction ifzetaConnectoris already set. Additionally, the error is tested inGatewayEVM.t.sol, ensuring that the contract behaves as expected when this error condition is met.
- Usage in Contract Logic:
v2/src/evm/GatewayEVM.sol- Test Coverage:
v2/test/GatewayEVM.t.solScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage context of `ConnectorInitialized`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `ConnectorInitialized` to ensure it's used appropriately. rg --type solidity 'ConnectorInitialized'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for occurrences of `ConnectorInitialized` in Solidity files. # Test: Use `rg` to find occurrences of `ConnectorInitialized` in all files. rg 'ConnectorInitialized' --glob '*.sol' -A 5Length of output: 1095
v2/src/zevm/interfaces/IGatewayZEVM.sol (1)
160-160: Verify the usage context ofInsufficientZetaAmount.The new error
InsufficientZetaAmountenhances error handling. Ensure it is appropriately used in the contract logic.Verification successful
Usage of
InsufficientZetaAmountis VerifiedThe
InsufficientZetaAmounterror is used in theGatewayZEVM.solcontract to handle cases where theamountis zero, ensuring that the contract logic appropriately reverts when the condition is met. Additionally, it is tested inGatewayZEVM.t.sol, confirming its integration into the contract's error handling mechanisms.
- Code Locations:
v2/src/zevm/GatewayZEVM.sol: Lines whereInsufficientZetaAmountis used to revert transactions.v2/test/GatewayZEVM.t.sol: Lines whereInsufficientZetaAmountis tested.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage context of `InsufficientZetaAmount`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `InsufficientZetaAmount` to ensure it's used appropriately. rg --type solidity 'InsufficientZetaAmount'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage context of `InsufficientZetaAmount`. # Test: Search for occurrences of `InsufficientZetaAmount` in the codebase. rg 'InsufficientZetaAmount'Length of output: 60977
v2/typechain-types/factories/SenderZEVM__factory.ts (1)
123-123: Verify the bytecode update.The
_bytecodevariable has been updated. Ensure that this change is intentional and that any dependent systems or tests are updated to reflect this change.v2/pkg/igatewayevm.sol/igatewayevmerrors.go (1)
34-34: Ensure handling of the new "ConnectorInitialized" error.The ABI now includes the "ConnectorInitialized" error. Verify that this error is properly handled in the contract logic and tests.
Verification successful
Handling of "ConnectorInitialized" Error Verified
The "ConnectorInitialized" error is properly handled in both the contract logic and the test suite. The error is used in
GatewayEVM.soland is expected in tests such asGatewayEVM.t.sol. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of the "ConnectorInitialized" error in the codebase. # Test: Search for "ConnectorInitialized" usage in the codebase. Expect: Proper handling in contract logic and tests. rg 'ConnectorInitialized'Length of output: 153897
v2/pkg/igatewayzevm.sol/igatewayzevmerrors.go (1)
34-34: Ensure handling of the new "InsufficientZetaAmount" error.The ABI now includes the "InsufficientZetaAmount" error. Verify that this error is properly handled in the contract logic and tests.
Verification successful
Handling of "InsufficientZetaAmount" Error Verified
The "InsufficientZetaAmount" error is properly handled in the contract logic and is tested in the codebase.
- Contract Logic: The error is triggered in
GatewayZEVM.solwhen the amount is zero.- Tests: The error is expected and tested in
GatewayZEVM.t.sol.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of the "InsufficientZetaAmount" error in the codebase. # Test: Search for "InsufficientZetaAmount" usage in the codebase. Expect: Proper handling in contract logic and tests. rg 'InsufficientZetaAmount'Length of output: 60977
v2/typechain-types/factories/ZetaConnectorBase__factory.ts (1)
38-50: Addition ofTSS_ROLEis consistent and appropriate.The addition of the
TSS_ROLEfunction to the ABI is consistent with other role declarations and correctly defined as a view function. This enhances the role-based access control mechanism.v2/test/ZRC20.t.sol (9)
66-75: Comprehensive transfer test coverage.The
testTransferfunction effectively verifies the transfer functionality by checking the recipient's balance before and after the transfer.
77-85: Robust testing for transfer failure due to insufficient balance.The
testTransferFailsIfNoBalancefunction appropriately tests the failure scenario when the sender's balance is insufficient.
87-92: Validation of zero address recipient in transfer.The
testTransferFailsIfRecipientIsZeroAddressfunction correctly checks for reverts when attempting to transfer to a zero address.
158-161: Approval rejection for zero address recipient.The
testApproveFailsIfRecipientIsZeroAddressfunction ensures that approving a zero address results in a revert, which is a critical security check.
179-183: Deposit failure test for zero address recipient.The
testDepositFailsIfRecipientIsZeroAddressfunction effectively tests the scenario where a deposit to a zero address should fail.
245-259: Withdrawal failure due to insufficient balance.The
testWithdrawFailsIfNoBalancefunction accurately tests the failure condition when withdrawing with insufficient balance.
261-275: Withdrawal failure due to no allowance.The
testWithdrawFailsIfNoAllowancefunction correctly tests the scenario where a withdrawal fails due to lack of allowance.
288-292: System contract address update failure for zero address.The
testUpdateSystemContractAddressFailsIfZeroAddressfunction ensures that updating the system contract address to a zero address fails, which is a necessary validation.
305-309: Gateway address update failure for zero address.The
testUpdateGatewayAddressFailsIfZeroAddressfunction appropriately tests the failure scenario for updating the gateway address to a zero address.v2/src/zevm/GatewayZEVM.sol (12)
55-55: Initialization input validation is robust.The added checks for zero addresses in the
initializefunction enhance the contract's robustness by ensuring valid inputs during initialization.
121-123: Receiver and amount validation in withdrawal.The
withdrawfunction now includes essential checks for the receiver's length and amount, preventing invalid operations.
143-145: Enhanced validation inwithdrawAndCall.The
withdrawAndCallfunction now correctly validates the receiver and amount, improving security.
153-154: Amount validation in ZETA withdrawal.The
withdrawfunction includes a necessary check for non-zero amounts, ensuring valid withdrawals.
174-175: Amount validation inwithdrawAndCall.The
withdrawAndCallfunction now includes a check for non-zero amounts, enhancing reliability.
186-187: Receiver validation incallfunction.The
callfunction now includes a check for the receiver's length, preventing invalid calls.
196-198: Input validation in deposit function.The
depositfunction now includes checks for zero addresses and non-zero amounts, improving security.
221-223: Input validation inexecutefunction.The
executefunction now includes checks for zero addresses and non-zero amounts, enhancing robustness.
244-245: Input validation indepositAndCall.The
depositAndCallfunction now includes checks for zero addresses and non-zero amounts, improving reliability.
267-268: Target validation in ZETA deposit and call.The
depositAndCallfunction now includes a check for a zero target address, preventing invalid operations.
292-294: Input validation inexecuteRevert.The
executeRevertfunction now includes checks for zero addresses and non-zero amounts, enhancing security.
315-316: Input validation indepositAndRevert.The
depositAndRevertfunction now includes checks for zero addresses and non-zero amounts, improving robustness.v2/test/ZetaConnectorNative.t.sol (3)
43-43: Introduction ofEnforcedPauseError is Appropriate.The
EnforcedPauseerror effectively handles scenarios where operations are attempted while the contract is paused. This enhances security by preventing unauthorized actions during a paused state.
47-47: Introduction ofPAUSER_ROLEConstant is Appropriate.The addition of the
PAUSER_ROLEconstant aligns with access control best practices, allowing designated roles to manage the contract's pause state effectively.
93-126: Comprehensive Testing of Pause Functionality.The
testWithdrawTogglePausefunction effectively tests the pause and unpause functionality, ensuring only authorized accounts can perform these actions and that withdrawals are blocked when paused.Consider verifying its integration with the rest of the test suite to ensure comprehensive coverage.
v2/src/evm/GatewayEVM.sol (7)
133-133: Zero Address Check fordestinationEnhances Security.The addition of a zero address check for the
destinationparameter prevents invalid interactions, thereby enhancing the security of theexecutefunction.
160-160: Zero Address Check fortoParameter is Necessary.The zero address check for the
toparameter is a necessary validation step to prevent invalid token transfers, enhancing the function's robustness.
197-197: Zero Address Check fortoParameter Enhances Security.The addition of a zero address check for the
toparameter enhances security by preventing invalid interactions in therevertWithERC20function.
209-209: Zero Address Check forreceiverParameter is Crucial.The zero address check for the
receiverparameter is crucial for ensuring valid deposit operations, enhancing the function's reliability.
236-236: Zero Address Check forreceiverParameter is Essential.The zero address check for the
receiverparameter is essential for preventing invalid interactions during deposit and call operations, thereby enhancing security.
279-279: Reordering Checks insetCustodyStreamlines Control Flow.Reordering the checks to place the zero address check before the custody initialization check ensures that invalid addresses are caught early, streamlining the control flow.
289-289: Reordering Checks insetConnectorImproves Robustness.Reordering the checks to place the zero address check before the connector initialization check ensures early detection of invalid addresses, improving the function's robustness.
v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.sol (9)
44-44: Introduction ofExceedsMaxSupplyError is Appropriate.The
ExceedsMaxSupplyerror effectively handles scenarios where attempts are made to exceed the maximum supply, enforcing supply limits and ensuring contract constraints are respected.
45-45: Introduction ofEnforcedPauseError is Appropriate.The
EnforcedPauseerror effectively handles scenarios where operations are attempted while the contract is paused, enhancing security by preventing unauthorized actions during a paused state.
48-48: Introduction ofTSS_ROLEConstant is Appropriate.The addition of the
TSS_ROLEconstant aligns with access control best practices, allowing designated roles to manage TSS-related operations effectively.
49-49: Introduction ofPAUSER_ROLEConstant is Appropriate.The addition of the
PAUSER_ROLEconstant aligns with access control best practices, allowing designated roles to manage the contract's pause state effectively.
311-320: Testing Exceeding Max Supply is Well-Structured.The
testWithdrawAndFailsIfMaxSupplyIsReachedfunction is well-structured, ensuring that attempts to exceed the maximum supply trigger theExceedsMaxSupplyerror.
322-332: Testing Exceeding Max Supply in Withdraw and Call is Well-Structured.The
testWithdrawAndCallFailsIfMaxSupplyIsReachedfunction is well-structured, ensuring that attempts to exceed the maximum supply trigger theExceedsMaxSupplyerror.
334-344: Testing Exceeding Max Supply in Withdraw and Revert is Well-Structured.The
testWithdrawAndRevertFailsIfMaxSupplyIsReachedfunction is well-structured, ensuring that attempts to exceed the maximum supply trigger theExceedsMaxSupplyerror.
346-350: Testing Unauthorized Max Supply Setting is Well-Structured.The
testSexMaxSupplyFailsIfSenderIsNotTssfunction is well-structured, ensuring that unauthorized attempts to set the maximum supply trigger theAccessControlUnauthorizedAccounterror.
96-130: Comprehensive Testing of Pause Functionality.The
testWithdrawTogglePausefunction effectively tests the pause and unpause functionality, ensuring only authorized accounts can perform these actions and that withdrawals are blocked when paused.Consider verifying its integration with the rest of the test suite to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Verification successful
Function
testWithdrawTogglePauseis Present in the Test FileThe
testWithdrawTogglePausefunction is correctly defined in thev2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.solfile. This confirms its presence in the test suite.
- File:
v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.sol- Function:
testWithdrawTogglePauseScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `testWithdrawTogglePause` with the rest of the test suite. # Test: Run the test suite to ensure `testWithdrawTogglePause` is included and passes. forge test --match-path v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.solLength of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the presence and definition of the `testWithdrawTogglePause` function in the test file. ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern $'function testWithdrawTogglePause() public { $$$ }' v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.solLength of output: 242
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for the definition of the `testWithdrawTogglePause` function in the test file. rg 'function testWithdrawTogglePause\(\) public' v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.solLength of output: 135
v2/test/GatewayEVM.t.sol (17)
33-33: LGTM: UpdatedzetatoZetaNonEth.The change from
TestERC20toZetaNonEthis appropriate for testing non-native token functionalities.
78-83: LGTM: Access control test for custody.The test correctly checks that only an admin can set custody.
86-89: LGTM: Custody initialization test.The test correctly ensures that custody cannot be set again once initialized.
92-95: LGTM: Zero address check for custody.The test correctly ensures that custody cannot be set to a zero address.
98-103: LGTM: Access control test for connector.The test correctly checks that only an admin can set the connector.
106-109: LGTM: Connector initialization test.The test correctly ensures that the connector cannot be set again once initialized.
112-115: LGTM: Zero address check for connector.The test correctly ensures that the connector cannot be set to a zero address.
181-186: LGTM: Zero address execution test.The test correctly ensures that execution cannot proceed if the destination is a zero address.
Line range hint
219-224: LGTM: Role-based access control for ERC20 execution.The test correctly ensures that only authorized roles can execute with ERC20.
Line range hint
229-234: LGTM: Role-based access control for ERC20 revert.The test correctly ensures that only authorized roles can revert with ERC20.
267-273: LGTM: Zero address revert test.The test correctly ensures that execution revert cannot proceed if the receiver is a zero address.
285-285: LGTM: UpdatedzetatoZetaNonEth.The change from
TestERC20toZetaNonEthis appropriate for testing non-native token functionalities.
338-347: LGTM: Deposit Zeta to connector test.The test correctly verifies the deposit of Zeta tokens to the connector.
359-362: LGTM: Zero address deposit test for ERC20.The test correctly ensures that depositing to a zero address fails.
384-388: LGTM: Zero address deposit test for ETH.The test correctly ensures that depositing ETH to a zero address fails.
420-426: LGTM: Zero address deposit with payload test for ERC20.The test correctly ensures that depositing with payload to a zero address fails.
450-455: LGTM: Zero address deposit with payload test for ETH.The test correctly ensures that depositing with payload to a zero address fails.
v2/pkg/senderzevm.sol/senderzevm.go (1)
35-35: Verify the impact of the bytecode change.The
Binfield inSenderZEVMMetaDatahas been updated, indicating a change in the contract's bytecode. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended functionality and does not introduce any issues.Verification successful
No impact on current functionality due to bytecode change
The change in the
SenderZEVMMetaData.Binfield does not affect other parts of the codebase, as it is only referenced in a deprecated variable. Ensure that any intended changes in functionality due to the bytecode update are documented or tested separately.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the bytecode change in SenderZEVMMetaData. # Test: Search for references to SenderZEVMMetaData in the codebase. # Expect: Ensure that the changes align with the intended functionality. rg --type go 'SenderZEVMMetaData'Length of output: 719
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of SenderZEVMMetaData.Bin in the codebase to verify the impact of the bytecode change. # Test: Search for references to SenderZEVMMetaData.Bin in the codebase. rg --type go 'SenderZEVMMetaData\.Bin'Length of output: 206
v2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorBase.ts (1)
31-31: Verify integration ofTSS_ROLE.The addition of
TSS_ROLEenhances role management capabilities. Ensure that the integration is consistent and correctly utilized in the contract's logic.Also applies to: 70-70, 129-129, 347-347, 437-439
Verification successful
Integration of
TSS_ROLEis consistent and correct.The
TSS_ROLEis integrated across various parts of the codebase, including role management functions such asgetRoleAdmin,grantRole, andhasRole. It is consistently used in both contract logic and associated factory files, indicating proper integration. No issues were found in its usage.
- Files where
TSS_ROLEis integrated:
v2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorBase.tsv2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorNative.tsv2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorNonNative.ts- Various factory and test files
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and usage of TSS_ROLE in the ZetaConnectorBase interfaces. # Test: Search for references to TSS_ROLE in the TypeScript codebase. # Expect: Ensure that TSS_ROLE is correctly integrated and utilized. rg --type ts 'TSS_ROLE'Length of output: 3347
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of TSS_ROLE in the logic of the contracts to verify its integration. # Test: Search for TSS_ROLE usage in contract logic. # Expect: Ensure that TSS_ROLE is correctly integrated and utilized in contract logic. rg --type ts 'TSS_ROLE' -A 5Length of output: 16528
v2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorNative.ts (5)
31-31: Addition ofTSS_ROLEtogetFunction.The inclusion of
TSS_ROLEin thegetFunctionmethod enhances the role management capabilities by allowing dynamic retrieval of function fragments associated with this role. This change is consistent with the introduction of the new role.
70-70: Addition ofencodeFunctionDataforTSS_ROLE.The
encodeFunctionDatamethod forTSS_ROLEis correctly added, enabling the encoding of function calls related to this role. This is a necessary addition for handling the new role.
129-129: Addition ofdecodeFunctionResultforTSS_ROLE.The
decodeFunctionResultmethod forTSS_ROLEis properly added, facilitating the decoding of results from function calls associated with this role. This ensures correct interpretation of responses involvingTSS_ROLE.
347-347: Exposure ofTSS_ROLEas aTypedContractMethod.The addition of
TSS_ROLEas aTypedContractMethodin theZetaConnectorNativeinterface allows for structured access to this role. This enhances the contract's interaction capabilities.
437-439: Addition ofgetFunctionforTSS_ROLE.The
getFunctionmethod forTSS_ROLEis correctly added, enabling dynamic retrieval of the function associated with this role. This is consistent with the role's integration into the contract.v2/test/ERC20Custody.t.sol (18)
1-44: Comprehensive Test Setup and Imports.The test setup includes necessary imports and constants for role management. The use of
forge-stdfor testing utilities is appropriate. The constants for roles are well-defined, ensuring clarity in access control tests.
45-72: EffectivesetUpMethod Implementation.The
setUpmethod effectively initializes the test environment, deploying necessary contracts and setting initial conditions. The use ofvm.dealandvm.startPrankis correct for setting up account balances and simulating transactions.
74-85: Test for Zero Address Handling.The test
testNewCustodyFailsIfAddressesAreZeroappropriately checks for zero address inputs, ensuring that the contract reverts as expected. This is a crucial test for input validation.
87-119: Test for Token Transfer and Event Emission.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20ThroughCustodyverifies token transfer logic and event emission. The use ofvm.expectEmitensures that events are emitted as expected, providing robust test coverage.
121-172: Test for Pause Functionality and Reversion.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20ThroughCustodyTogglePauseeffectively checks the pause and unpause functionality, ensuring that operations revert when paused. This is crucial for maintaining contract state integrity.
174-182: Test for Unauthorized Access.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20ThroughCustodyFailsIfSenderIsNotWithdrawercorrectly verifies that only authorized accounts can perform certain actions, reinforcing role-based access control.
184-192: Test for Zero Amount Handling.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20ThroughCustodyFailsIfAmountIs0ensures that the contract reverts when attempting to transfer zero tokens, which is important for preventing unnecessary operations.
194-202: Test for Zero Address Receiver.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20ThroughCustodyFailsIfReceiverIsZeroAddresschecks for zero address handling in the receiver parameter, ensuring robust input validation.
204-236: Test for Partial Token Transfer.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20PartialThroughCustodyverifies the logic for partial token transfers, ensuring correct handling of token amounts and event emissions.
238-246: Test for Unauthorized Partial Transfer.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20PartialThroughCustodyFailsIfSenderIsNotWithdrawerreinforces access control by ensuring unauthorized accounts cannot initiate partial transfers.
248-256: Test for Zero Amount in Partial Transfer.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveERC20PartialThroughCustodyFailsIfAmountIs0ensures that partial transfers with zero amount revert, maintaining logical consistency in token operations.
258-289: Test for No Parameter Function Call.The test
testForwardCallToReceiveNoParamsThroughCustodychecks the behavior of functions with no parameters, ensuring correct event emissions and state changes.
291-315: Test for Direct Withdrawal.The test
testWithdrawThroughCustodyverifies direct token withdrawal logic, ensuring tokens are transferred correctly and events are emitted as expected.
317-323: Test for Unauthorized Withdrawal.The test
testWithdrawThroughCustodyFailsIfSenderIsNotWithdrawerensures that only authorized accounts can perform withdrawals, reinforcing security through access control.
325-359: Test for Withdraw and Revert Logic.The test
testWithdrawAndRevertThroughCustodychecks the logic for withdrawing and reverting, ensuring correct event emissions and token transfers.
361-368: Test for Unauthorized Withdraw and Revert.The test
testWithdrawAndRevertThroughCustodyFailsIfSenderIsNotWithdrawerensures unauthorized accounts cannot perform withdraw and revert operations, maintaining strict access control.
370-377: Test for Zero Amount in Withdraw and Revert.The test
testWithdrawAndRevertThroughCustodyFailsIfAmountIs0ensures operations revert when attempting to withdraw and revert with zero amount, maintaining logical consistency.
379-386: Test for Zero Address in Withdraw and Revert.The test
testWithdrawAndRevertThroughCustodyFailsIfReceiverIsZeroAddresschecks for zero address handling in the receiver parameter, ensuring robust input validation.v2/typechain-types/ZetaConnectorNonNative.ts (5)
31-31: Addition ofTSS_ROLEtogetFunction.The inclusion of
TSS_ROLEin thegetFunctionmethod enhances the role management capabilities by allowing dynamic retrieval of function fragments associated with this role. This change is consistent with the introduction of the new role.
73-73: Addition ofencodeFunctionDataforTSS_ROLE.The
encodeFunctionDatamethod forTSS_ROLEis correctly added, enabling the encoding of function calls related to this role. This is a necessary addition for handling the new role.
137-137: Addition ofdecodeFunctionResultforTSS_ROLE.The
decodeFunctionResultmethod forTSS_ROLEis properly added, facilitating the decoding of results from function calls associated with this role. This ensures correct interpretation of responses involvingTSS_ROLE.
372-372: Exposure ofTSS_ROLEas aTypedContractMethod.The addition of
TSS_ROLEas aTypedContractMethodin theZetaConnectorNonNativeinterface allows for structured access to this role. This enhances the contract's interaction capabilities.
470-472: Addition ofgetFunctionforTSS_ROLE.The
getFunctionmethod forTSS_ROLEis correctly added, enabling dynamic retrieval of the function associated with this role. This is consistent with the role's integration into the contract.v2/typechain-types/factories/ERC20Custody__factory.ts (1)
585-585: Verify thorough testing of updated bytecode.The
_bytecodeconstant has been entirely replaced, indicating significant changes to the contract's logic or optimizations. Ensure that these changes are thoroughly tested to confirm the contract behaves as expected.Verification successful
Updated bytecode is covered by existing test cases.
The
ERC20Custodycontract is referenced in multiple test files, indicating that the updated bytecode is being tested. Ensure these tests are comprehensive and cover all new functionalities or changes.
- Test files include
v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.sol,v2/test/GatewayEVM.t.sol, andv1/test/ERC20Custody.spec.ts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the updated bytecode is thoroughly tested. # Test: Search for test cases involving `ERC20Custody`. rg --type javascript --type typescript --type solidity 'ERC20Custody'Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the updated bytecode is thoroughly tested. # Test: Search for test cases involving `ERC20Custody`. rg --type js --type ts --type sol 'ERC20Custody'Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the updated bytecode is thoroughly tested. # Test: Search for test cases involving `ERC20Custody` with custom file type definition for Solidity. rg --type-add 'sol:*.sol' --type js --type ts --type sol 'ERC20Custody'Length of output: 20389
v2/typechain-types/factories/ZetaConnectorNonNative__factory.ts (2)
620-620: Verify thorough testing of updated bytecode.The
_bytecodeconstant has been updated, indicating changes to the contract's logic or optimizations. Ensure these changes are thoroughly tested to confirm the contract behaves as expected.Verification successful
The updated bytecode is likely tested.
The
ZetaConnectorNonNativecontract is referenced in several test files, indicating that the updated bytecode is likely covered by tests. Ensure these tests are comprehensive and cover all new or modified functionalities.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the updated bytecode is thoroughly tested. # Test: Search for test cases involving `ZetaConnectorNonNative`. rg --type javascript --type typescript --type solidity 'ZetaConnectorNonNative'Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the updated bytecode is thoroughly tested. # Test: Search for test cases involving `ZetaConnectorNonNative`. rg --type js --type ts --type solidity 'ZetaConnectorNonNative'Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the updated bytecode is thoroughly tested. # Test: Search for test cases involving `ZetaConnectorNonNative`. rg --type js --type ts 'ZetaConnectorNonNative'Length of output: 2652
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for test files or functions involving `ZetaConnectorNonNative`. # Test: Look for test files or functions that reference `ZetaConnectorNonNative`. rg 'ZetaConnectorNonNative' --type js --type ts --glob '**/test/**' --glob '**/*.test.*'Length of output: 1776
75-87: Verify integration and testing ofTSS_ROLE.The
TSS_ROLEfunction has been added to the ABI to enhance role management. Ensure this function is integrated into the contract's role management logic and is thoroughly tested.v2/typechain-types/factories/ZetaConnectorNative__factory.ts (2)
614-614: Verify thorough testing of updated bytecode.The
_bytecodeconstant has been updated, indicating changes to the contract's logic or optimizations. Ensure these changes are thoroughly tested to confirm the contract behaves as expected.
75-87: Verify integration and testing ofTSS_ROLE.The
TSS_ROLEfunction has been added to the ABI to enhance role management. Ensure this function is integrated into the contract's role management logic and is thoroughly tested.Verification successful
TSS_ROLEIntegration and Testing VerifiedThe
TSS_ROLEconstant is integrated into the role management logic across multiple Solidity contracts and is referenced in several test files, indicating that it is being tested. This confirms thatTSS_ROLEis both integrated and tested within the codebase.
Files with
TSS_ROLEintegration:
v2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorNonNative.solv2/src/evm/ZetaConnectorBase.solv2/src/evm/GatewayEVM.solTest files referencing
TSS_ROLE:
v2/test/ZetaConnectorNonNative.t.solv2/test/GatewayEVM.t.solv2/test/utils/GatewayEVMUpgradeTest.solScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and testing of `TSS_ROLE`. # Test: Search for test cases involving `TSS_ROLE`. rg --type javascript --type typescript --type solidity 'TSS_ROLE'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and testing of `TSS_ROLE`. # Test: Search for test cases involving `TSS_ROLE` using correct file types. rg --type js --type ts --type sol 'TSS_ROLE'Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration and testing of `TSS_ROLE`. # Test: Search for test cases involving `TSS_ROLE` in JavaScript and TypeScript files. rg --type js --type ts 'TSS_ROLE' # Test: Search for test cases involving `TSS_ROLE` in Solidity files by extension. rg --glob '*.sol' 'TSS_ROLE'Length of output: 5034
v2/test/GatewayZEVM.t.sol (28)
79-89: Test case for low balance: Comprehensive coverage.The test case
testWithdrawZRC20FailsIfNoBalanceForGasFeecorrectly tests theLowBalanceerror when there is insufficient balance for gas fees. Ensure similar coverage for other scenarios.
91-98: Test case for low balance: Comprehensive coverage.The test case
testWithdrawZRC20FailsIfNoBalanceForTransfercorrectly tests theLowBalanceerror when there is insufficient balance for transfer. This complements the previous test case.
100-103: Test case for zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testWithdrawZRC20FailsIsAmountIs0verifies the contract's behavior when attempting to withdraw a zero amount, expecting theInsufficientZRC20Amounterror. This is a good practice for input validation.
105-108: Test case for zero address: Correct error handling.The test case
testWithdrawZRC20FailsIfReceiverIsZeroAddressensures that the contract reverts with theZeroAddresserror when the receiver is a zero address. This is essential for preventing invalid transactions.
126-130: Test case for withdraw and call with zero address: Correct error handling.The test case
testWithdrawAndCallZRC20FailsIfReceiverIsZeroAddresschecks for theZeroAddresserror when usingwithdrawAndCallwith a zero address. This maintains consistency with other zero address checks.
132-136: Test case for withdraw and call with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testWithdrawAndCallZRC20FailsIfAmountIsZeroverifies theInsufficientZRC20Amounterror when attempting to withdraw zero amount with a call. This ensures robust input validation.
170-173: Test case for zero amount withdrawal: Correct error handling.The test case
testWithdrawZETAFailsIfAmountIsZerocorrectly expects theInsufficientZetaAmounterror when withdrawing a zero amount. This aligns with the pattern of handling zero value transactions.
175-179: Test case for withdraw and call with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testWithdrawAndcallZETAFailsIfAmountIsZeroensures theInsufficientZetaAmounterror is triggered for zero amount withdrawals with a call. This is consistent with other zero amount checks.
226-234: Test case for no balance: Ensure correct error handling.The test case
testWithdrawZETAFailsIfNoBalanceexpects a revert when there is no balance to withdraw. Ensure that the contract logic correctly reverts in this scenario.
283-287: Test case for call with zero address: Correct error handling.The test case
testCallFailsIfReceiverIsZeroAddressensures that the contract reverts with theZeroAddresserror when the receiver is a zero address. This is consistent with other zero address checks.
354-358: Test case for deposit with zero ZRC20 address: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositFailsIfZrc20IsZeroAddresscorrectly expects theZeroAddresserror when the ZRC20 address is zero. This is crucial for maintaining valid contract interactions.
360-364: Test case for deposit with zero target address: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositFailsIfTargetIsZeroAddressensures theZeroAddresserror is triggered when the target address is zero. This aligns with best practices for input validation.
366-370: Test case for deposit with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositFailsIfAmountIs0correctly expects theInsufficientZRC20Amounterror for zero amount deposits. This ensures robust input validation.
443-451: Test case for execute with zero ZRC20 address: Correct error handling.The test case
testExecuteFailsIfZrc20IsZeroAddressensures theZeroAddresserror is triggered when the ZRC20 address is zero. This is consistent with other zero address checks.
453-461: Test case for execute with zero target address: Correct error handling.The test case
testExecuteFailsIfTargetIsZeroAddresschecks for theZeroAddresserror when the target address is zero. This maintains consistency with other zero address checks.
463-471: Test case for execute with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testExecuteFailsIfAmountIsZeroverifies theInsufficientZRC20Amounterror for zero amount executions. This ensures robust input validation.
494-502: Test case for execute revert with zero ZRC20 address: Correct error handling.The test case
testExecuteRevertZContractFailsIfZrc20IsZeroAddressensures theZeroAddresserror is triggered when the ZRC20 address is zero during a revert. This is consistent with other zero address checks.
504-512: Test case for execute revert with zero target address: Correct error handling.The test case
testExecuteRevertZContractFailsIfTargetIsZeroAddresschecks for theZeroAddresserror when the target address is zero during a revert. This maintains consistency with other zero address checks.
514-522: Test case for execute revert with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testExecuteRevertZContractFailsIfAmountIsZeroverifies theInsufficientZRC20Amounterror for zero amount reverts. This ensures robust input validation.
545-553: Test case for deposit and call with zero ZRC20 address: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositZRC20AndCallZContractFailsIfZrc20IsZeroAddressensures theZeroAddresserror is triggered when the ZRC20 address is zero during a deposit and call. This is consistent with other zero address checks.
555-563: Test case for deposit and call with zero target address: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositZRC20AndCallZContractFailsIfTargetIsZeroAddresschecks for theZeroAddresserror when the target address is zero during a deposit and call. This maintains consistency with other zero address checks.
565-573: Test case for deposit and call with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositZRC20AndCallZContractFailsIfAmountIsZeroverifies theInsufficientZRC20Amounterror for zero amount deposits and calls. This ensures robust input validation.
622-630: Test case for deposit and revert with zero ZRC20 address: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositAndRevertZRC20AndCallZContractFailsIfZrc20IsZeroAddressensures theZeroAddresserror is triggered when the ZRC20 address is zero during a deposit and revert. This is consistent with other zero address checks.
632-640: Test case for deposit and revert with zero target address: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositAndRevertZRC20AndCallZContractFailsIfTargetIsZeroAddresschecks for theZeroAddresserror when the target address is zero during a deposit and revert. This maintains consistency with other zero address checks.
642-650: Test case for deposit and revert with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositAndRevertZRC20AndCallZContractFailsIfAmountIsZeroverifies theInsufficientZRC20Amounterror for zero amount deposits and reverts. This ensures robust input validation.
699-707: Test case for deposit ZETA and call with zero target address: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositZETAAndCallZContractFailsIfTargetIsZeroAddressensures theZeroAddresserror is triggered when the target address is zero during a ZETA deposit and call. This is consistent with other zero address checks.
709-717: Test case for deposit ZETA and call with zero amount: Correct error handling.The test case
testDepositZETAAndCallZContractFailsIfTargetIsAmountIsZeroverifies theInsufficientZetaAmounterror for zero amount ZETA deposits and calls. This ensures robust input validation.
30-31: New error declarations: Ensure consistent usage.The
ZeroAddressandLowBalanceerrors are newly declared. Ensure these are consistently used across the test cases and that they match the error conditions in the contract under test.Verification successful
Consistent Usage of
ZeroAddressandLowBalanceErrors VerifiedThe
ZeroAddressandLowBalanceerrors are consistently used across the codebase in both contracts and test files. They are declared and utilized in various scenarios, ensuring that error conditions are correctly handled and tested.
Files with
ZeroAddressusage:
v2/src/zevm/GatewayZEVM.solv2/src/zevm/ZRC20.sol- Various test files including
v2/test/GatewayZEVM.t.solFiles with
LowBalanceusage:
v2/src/zevm/ZRC20.sol- Test files such as
v2/test/ZRC20.t.solThese errors are integrated into the logic of the contracts and are verified through comprehensive testing.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of ZeroAddress and LowBalance errors in the contract. ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern $'error ZeroAddress();' --pattern $'error LowBalance();'Length of output: 208
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for occurrences of ZeroAddress and LowBalance in Solidity files to verify their usage. rg 'ZeroAddress' --glob '*.sol' -A 5 rg 'LowBalance' --glob '*.sol' -A 5Length of output: 48594
v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVMUpgradeTest__factory.ts (2)
935-939: New error declaration: Ensure correct integration.The
ConnectorInitializederror is added to the ABI. Ensure that this error is correctly integrated and used in the contract logic where applicable.Verification successful
Integration of
ConnectorInitializedError VerifiedThe
ConnectorInitializederror is correctly integrated into the contract logic and is being used as intended. It is declared in theIGatewayEVM.solinterface, utilized in theGatewayEVM.solcontract, and tested inGatewayEVM.t.sol. No issues found with its integration.
v2/src/evm/interfaces/IGatewayEVM.sol: Declaration ofConnectorInitialized.v2/src/evm/GatewayEVM.sol: Usage in contract logic.v2/test/GatewayEVM.t.sol: Test case for the error.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of ConnectorInitialized error in the contract. ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern $'error ConnectorInitialized();'Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the declaration and usage of ConnectorInitialized error in Solidity files. rg 'ConnectorInitialized' --glob '*.sol' -A 5Length of output: 1095
1046-1046: Bytecode update: Verify consistency with contract logic.The
_bytecodevariable has been updated. Ensure that the changes in the bytecode reflect the intended logic and functionality of the contract.v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVM__factory.ts (2)
907-911: Addition ofConnectorInitializederror type.The addition of the
ConnectorInitializederror type to the ABI enhances the contract's ability to handle specific error conditions related to connector initialization. This is a positive change for improving error handling and debugging.
1018-1018: Modification ofGatewayEVMConstructorParamstype declaration.The change in the
GatewayEVMConstructorParamstype declaration to include a tuple with an optionalSigneris a good approach for flexibility in constructor parameters. It allows for more versatile contract deployment scenarios.v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayZEVM__factory.ts (3)
960-964: Addition ofInsufficientZetaAmounterror type looks good.The new error type enhances error handling by providing specific feedback related to Zeta token transactions. This aligns with existing patterns in the file.
1034-1034: Verify the updated bytecode.The change in the
_bytecodestring reflects updates in the contract's compiled logic. Ensure that these changes are tested and verified for correctness.
1036-1036: Change toGatewayZEVMConstructorParamsis approved.The inclusion of an optional
signeradds flexibility to the constructor parameters. Ensure compatibility with existing code.Consider verifying that all constructor usages are updated to handle the new parameter option.
v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVMEchidnaTest__factory.ts (2)
959-963: Addition ofConnectorInitializederror improves error handling.The inclusion of the
ConnectorInitializederror in the ABI enhances the contract's error handling capabilities by providing a specific error type for connector initialization issues. This can improve debugging and user experience.
1070-1070: Constructor parameter change enhances flexibility.The addition of an optional
signerparameter to the constructor allows for more flexible instantiation of the contract factory. It supports scenarios with and without a signer, enhancing usability.v2/pkg/zetaconnectorbase.sol/zetaconnectorbase.go (4)
34-34: ABI Update Approved.The ABI string has been correctly updated to include the new
TSS_ROLEfunction. This enhances the role management capabilities of the contract.
248-260: Addition ofTSSROLEFunction Approved.The
TSSROLEfunction inZetaConnectorBaseCalleris correctly implemented and consistent with other role retrieval methods.
265-267: Addition ofTSSROLEFunction in Session Approved.The
TSSROLEfunction inZetaConnectorBaseSessionis correctly implemented and consistent with the session-based access pattern.
272-274: Addition ofTSSROLEFunction in Caller Session Approved.The
TSSROLEfunction inZetaConnectorBaseCallerSessionis correctly implemented and consistent with the caller session pattern.v2/pkg/erc20custody.sol/erc20custody.go (1)
35-35: Verify ABI and binary consistency.Ensure that the updated ABI accurately reflects the intended function signatures and error types. The binary representation should be consistent with these changes.
v2/pkg/zetaconnectornative.sol/zetaconnectornative.go (3)
34-34: ABI Update: Inclusion of TSS_ROLE.The ABI has been updated to include the
TSS_ROLEfunction, enhancing the contract's role management capabilities.
270-282: Addition of TSSROLE function in ZetaConnectorNativeCaller.The
TSSROLEfunction has been added to theZetaConnectorNativeCallerstruct, allowing external calls to retrieve theTSS_ROLE. The implementation is consistent with other role retrieval functions.
287-296: Addition of TSSROLE functions in session structs.The
TSSROLEfunctions have been added to bothZetaConnectorNativeSessionandZetaConnectorNativeCallerSession, enabling session-based calls to retrieve theTSS_ROLE. The implementation is consistent with other session-based role retrieval functions.v2/pkg/zetaconnectornonnative.sol/zetaconnectornonnative.go (3)
270-282: LGTM: Consistent implementation for TSSROLE in ZetaConnectorNonNativeCaller.The function follows the existing pattern for role retrieval functions, ensuring consistency and correctness.
287-289: LGTM: Consistent implementation for TSSROLE in ZetaConnectorNonNativeSession.This function correctly uses the session's call options to retrieve the
TSS_ROLE.
294-296: LGTM: Consistent implementation for TSSROLE in ZetaConnectorNonNativeCallerSession.This function aligns well with the existing caller session pattern, ensuring proper use of session call options.
v2/pkg/gatewayzevm.sol/gatewayzevm.go (3)
Line range hint
111-118:
VerifyGatewayZEVMstruct and method updates.Ensure that the
GatewayZEVMstruct and related methods correctly reflect the updated contract interface and handle any deprecated fields appropriately.
48-49: Verify ABI and Bin updates in Go bindings.The ABI and Bin have been updated with new functions, events, and error types. Ensure that these changes are correctly reflected in the Go bindings and that any deprecated fields are appropriately handled.
Verification successful
ABI and Bin updates are correctly reflected in Go bindings.
The Go bindings for the
GatewayZEVMcontract have been updated to include the new ABI and Bin. The functionsDepositAndCall,WithdrawAndCall, and the errorInsufficientZetaAmountare correctly referenced in the codebase, confirming that the updates are reflected. No deprecated fields are being used.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the Go bindings reflect the updated ABI and Bin. # Test: Check for usage of deprecated fields. Expect: No usage of deprecated fields. rg --type go 'GatewayZEVMABI|GatewayZEVM[AB]in' # Test: Check for references to updated functions, events, and errors in the Go codebase. rg --type go 'DepositAndCall|WithdrawAndCall|InsufficientZetaAmount'Length of output: 278194
Line range hint
97-108:
Verify ABI parsing inDeployGatewayZEVM.Ensure that the ABI parsing in
DeployGatewayZEVMaligns with the updated ABI structure. This is crucial for correct contract deployment and interaction.v2/pkg/gatewayevm.sol/gatewayevm.go (1)
34-35: Verify ABI and Binary Consistency.The ABI and binary values have been updated. Ensure that these changes accurately reflect the intended contract functionality and that the binary is consistent with the updated ABI.
v2/pkg/gatewayevmupgradetest.sol/gatewayevmupgradetest.go (1)
34-35: Verify ABI and binary consistency.The ABI and binary representation have been updated. Ensure that these changes align with the intended functionality of the contract and that the new functions and events are adequately tested.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- v2/pkg/gatewayevm.sol/gatewayevm.go (1 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVMEchidnaTest__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVM__factory.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- v2/pkg/gatewayevm.sol/gatewayevm.go
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVMEchidnaTest__factory.ts
- v2/typechain-types/factories/GatewayEVM__factory.ts
We should exclude it from coverage yes |
bumps v2 coverage from ~70% to ~80%, fixes some smaller issues, extends simple checks of external functions a bit
@lumtis question about more tests - the only protocol contract that is not tested is SystemContract, simply because we are not using full functionality, there are no tests for it in v1, and it will be replaced by some sort of registry contract, so no point to add tests for whole contract now
this contract is currently under
test/utilsso it's not impacting coverage, should we move it undersrc/zevmand exclude from coverage?Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
TSS_ROLE, for improved access control across multiple contracts.ConnectorInitializedandInsufficientZetaAmount.ERC20Custody,GatewayEVM,GatewayZEVM, andZetaConnectorBase.Bug Fixes
Tests
ERC20Custody,GatewayEVM, andGatewayZEVMto validate functionalities and edge cases.