refactor: integrated base Observer structure into existing EVM/BTC observers #2359
Conversation
…actor-base-signer-observer
…actor-integrate-base-signer-observer-into-existing-structs
|
!!!WARNING!!! Be very careful about using Only suppress a single rule (or a specific set of rules) within a section of code, while continuing to scan for other problems. To do this, you can list the rule(s) to be suppressed within the #nosec annotation, e.g: /* #nosec G401 */ or //#nosec G201 G202 G203 Pay extra attention to the way |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2359 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 68.65% 69.43% +0.78%
===========================================
Files 305 306 +1
Lines 19158 19046 -112
===========================================
+ Hits 13152 13224 +72
+ Misses 5357 5166 -191
- Partials 649 656 +7
|
ws4charlie
requested review from
brewmaster012,
kingpinXD,
lumtis,
skosito and
swift1337
as code owners
|
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11759679 | Triggered | Generic High Entropy Secret | 5edd452 | cmd/zetae2e/local/accounts.go | View secret |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
- Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
- Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
- Revoke and rotate this secret.
- If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.
To avoid such incidents in the future consider
- following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
- install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.
…actor-integrate-base-observer
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters Files ignored due to path filters (16)
You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes integrate a base Observer structure into the EVM/Bitcoin Observer, streamline orchestrator validation, and group structs. They simplify Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 33
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (1)
Line range hint
23-40: Refactor suggestion: Consolidate common test setup code.The
createObserverfunction is repeated in multiple test cases. Consider moving common setup code to a helper function or using a setup function in the test suite to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1)
Line range hint
96-129: Initialization of caches and error handling.The initialization of
blockCacheandheaderCacheis handled well with appropriate error checks. However, consider adding more detailed logging in case of initialization failures to aid in debugging.if err != nil { - return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "error creating block cache") + ob.Logger().Chain.Error().Err(err).Msg("Failed to create block cache") + return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "error creating block cache") }Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 133-135: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L133-L135
Added lines #L133 - L135 were not covered by tests
[warning] 138-138: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L138
Added line #L138 was not covered by tests
[warning] 140-140: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L140
Added line #L140 was not covered by tests
[warning] 142-142: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L142
Added line #L142 was not covered by testszetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (3)
Line range hint
28-37: Add test coverage for the ticker setup inWatchInbound.The setup of the dynamic ticker and the initial logging are critical parts of the function, yet they are not covered by tests. Ensuring that the ticker is correctly configured and that logging works as expected is crucial for the reliability of the inbound observation functionality.
Line range hint
87-164: Add test coverage for transaction processing inObserveInbound.The transaction processing logic is complex and involves several steps, including querying for transactions, posting to Zetacore, and handling errors. This critical functionality lacks test coverage, which is essential to ensure its reliability and correctness.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 108-108: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests
[warning] 111-111: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L111
Added line #L111 was not covered by tests
[warning] 119-119: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L119
Added line #L119 was not covered by tests
[warning] 122-122: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L122
Added line #L122 was not covered by tests
[warning] 126-126: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests
Line range hint
204-217: Ensure detailed logging and error handling inProcessInboundTrackers.The function logs detailed information about each tracker and handles errors effectively. However, consider adding more specific error messages to provide clearer context in the logs, which could aid in debugging and operational monitoring.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 185-185: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L185
Added line #L185 was not covered by tests
[warning] 192-192: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L192
Added line #L192 was not covered by testszetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (1)
216-216: Live Test Functions:The live test functions (
LiveTestNewRPCClientandLiveTestGetBlockHeightByHash) are well-structured and focus on specific functionalities. It's important to ensure these tests do not interact with live systems during regular test runs. Consider using environment flags or configuration settings to explicitly enable live tests to prevent accidental runs.Consider using environment flags or configuration settings to explicitly enable live tests to prevent accidental runs.
Also applies to: 224-224
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer_test.go (1)
Line range hint
35-71: Context and Configuration Setup for Tests:The function
getZetacoreContextis well-structured to create a mock context for unit tests. It handles default values and setups necessary for isolated testing. However, consider adding error handling for the configuration setup to catch any misconfigurations that could affect test outcomes.+ // Consider adding error handling for the configuration setup.zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (1)
Line range hint
187-220: ISSUE: Potential infinite loop risk.The
WatchRPCStatusmethod contains a loop that could potentially run indefinitely if theStopChannelis not properly triggered. Ensure that there are adequate safeguards to prevent this from becoming an issue, especially in error scenarios where continuous failures might prevent the exit condition from being reached.Consider adding more robust error handling or a maximum retry limit to mitigate potential infinite looping.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (3)
Line range hint
228-253: RPC Status Monitoring LogicThe method
WatchRPCStatuseffectively monitors the RPC status by checking various metrics. However, consider refactoring to reduce the nested depth of conditionals and loops for better readability and potentially extracting some logic into separate methods or helpers.+ // Refactor to improve readability and reduce complexity + // Consider extracting repeated error handling into a helper function
Line range hint
335-372: Gas Price Posting LogicThe method
PostGasPricehandles different scenarios for gas price calculation and posting. The hardcoded values for regnet should be documented to clarify their purpose. Additionally, error handling is robust, but adding more specific error messages could help in identifying issues more quickly.+ // Add comments to explain hardcoded values for regnet + // Improve error messages for better clarity and troubleshooting
Line range hint
450-509: UTXO Monitoring and Refresh LogicThe method
FetchUTXOsis comprehensive in its approach to fetching and filtering UTXOs. The use of a deferred panic recovery is a good safety measure. However, the method is quite long and does multiple things; consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused methods.+ // Consider breaking down the method to improve modularity and readabilityzetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go (4)
Line range hint
105-149: Improve error handling inProcessInboundTrackers.The function
ProcessInboundTrackershandles errors locally but could be improved by adding more specific error messages and possibly a retry mechanism for transient errors, especially when dealing with network requests or blockchain interactions.Consider enhancing error resilience by implementing a retry mechanism or more granular error handling to distinguish between transient and permanent errors.
Line range hint
229-255: Optimize event processing inObserveZetaSent.The method
ObserveZetaSentprocesses events in a loop but sorts them each time an event is added. This could be inefficient especially with a large number of events.Consider collecting all events first and then sorting them once before processing. This change would reduce the computational complexity from O(n log n) per event to O(n log n) overall.
- for iter.Next() { - ... - sort.SliceStable(events, ...) - } + for iter.Next() { + ... + } + sort.SliceStable(events, ...)
Line range hint
308-361: Enhance error handling inObserveERC20Deposited.Similar to
ObserveZetaSent, theObserveERC20Depositedfunction could benefit from more robust error handling and logging. Additionally, consider abstracting the repeated logic of transaction fetching and event processing into a shared function to reduce duplication.Consider creating a generic function to handle the fetching and processing of events which could be reused in both
ObserveZetaSentandObserveERC20Deposited.
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationCheck logical consistency in block number handling.
The current implementation does not handle legitimate cases of block number decrease due to chain reorganizations. It is recommended to add specific handling for such scenarios to ensure robustness.
- Consider adding logic to detect and handle block reorganizations gracefully.
- Enhance logging around block number handling for better debugging and traceability.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
161-217: Check logical consistency in block number handling.The check for block number not decreasing is good, but there might be edge cases where this could happen legitimately (e.g., chain reorganizations). It might be beneficial to handle this scenario more gracefully.
Additionally, consider adding more detailed logging around this area to aid in debugging such situations.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for handling of block reorganizations. # Test: Search for logic handling reorganizations. Expect: Specific handling or comments addressing reorganizations. rg --type py 'reorganization' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.goLength of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for implicit handling of block reorganizations. # Search for related terms that might indicate reorganization handling. rg 'rollback|reorg|block number|error handling' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go # Additionally, search for function definitions in the file to identify related methods. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func $_($_) $_' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.goLength of output: 536
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (26)
- changelog.md (1 hunks)
- cmd/zetaclientd/debug.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go (2 hunks)
- testutil/sample/crypto.go (2 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (10 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (10 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go (13 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go (25 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (17 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer_test.go (4 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go (22 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go (15 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (8 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go (33 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go (18 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (11 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer_test.go (6 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound.go (9 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound_test.go (7 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/outbound_data_test.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer.go (4 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer_test.go (11 hunks)
- zetaclient/supplychecker/zeta_supply_checker.go (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/testutils/mocks/btc_rpc.go (3 hunks)
- zetaclient/testutils/mocks/evm_rpc.go (3 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go
[warning] 133-135: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L133-L135
Added lines #L133 - L135 were not covered by tests
[warning] 138-138: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L138
Added line #L138 was not covered by tests
[warning] 140-140: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L140
Added line #L140 was not covered by tests
[warning] 142-142: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L142
Added line #L142 was not covered by tests
[warning] 282-283: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L282-L283
Added lines #L282 - L283 were not covered by tests
[warning] 287-287: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L287
Added line #L287 was not covered by tests
[warning] 315-315: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L315
Added line #L315 was not covered by tests
[warning] 321-321: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L321
Added line #L321 was not covered by tests
[warning] 332-332: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L332
Added line #L332 was not covered by tests
[warning] 336-336: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L336
Added line #L336 was not covered by testszetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go
[warning] 37-37: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L37
Added line #L37 was not covered by tests
[warning] 43-43: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L43
Added line #L43 was not covered by tests
[warning] 45-45: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L45
Added line #L45 was not covered by tests
[warning] 53-54: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L53-L54
Added lines #L53 - L54 were not covered by tests
[warning] 63-63: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L63
Added line #L63 was not covered by tests
[warning] 71-72: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L71-L72
Added lines #L71 - L72 were not covered by tests
[warning] 76-76: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests
[warning] 79-79: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L79
Added line #L79 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-82: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-88: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L87-L88
Added lines #L87 - L88 were not covered by tests
[warning] 95-95: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L95
Added line #L95 was not covered by tests
[warning] 108-108: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests
[warning] 111-111: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L111
Added line #L111 was not covered by tests
[warning] 119-119: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L119
Added line #L119 was not covered by tests
[warning] 122-122: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L122
Added line #L122 was not covered by tests
[warning] 126-126: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests
[warning] 145-145: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L145
Added line #L145 was not covered by tests
[warning] 164-164: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L164
Added line #L164 was not covered by tests
[warning] 185-185: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L185
Added line #L185 was not covered by tests
[warning] 192-192: zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound.go#L192
Added line #L192 was not covered by tests
Gitleaks
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go
130-130: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
148-148: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
166-166: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
210-210: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
235-235: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go
446-446: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
LanguageTool
changelog.md
[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_A)
Context: ...## Unreleased ### Breaking Changes * [List of the breaking changes can be found in...
[grammar] ~65-~65: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the plural noun “to-dos”? (TO_DO_HYPHEN)
Context: ...ub.com//pull/2329) - fix TODOs in rpc unit tests * [2342](https://gith...
[misspelling] ~80-~80: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICKED)
Context: ...//pull/2327) - partially cherry picked the fix to Bitcoin outbound dust amount...
[uncategorized] ~89-~89: When ‘mac-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen. (SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
Context: ...me which should be the version. Removed mac specific build as the arm build should handle th...
[style] ~90-~90: Consider changing the order of words to improve your wording. (TO_NOT_VB)
Context: ...ocker build step for non release builds to not overwrite the github tag * [2192](https...
[grammar] ~106-~106: Did you mean “sending”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘require’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ... * Updating admin policies now requires to send a governance proposal executing the `Up...
[uncategorized] ~178-~178: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Context: ...n/node/pull/1899) - add empty test files so packages are included in coverage * [19...
[uncategorized] ~229-~229: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ... Breaking Changes *zetaclientd start: now requires 2 inputs from stdin: hotke...
[grammar] ~266-~266: Did you mean “running”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ....com//pull/1584) - allow to run E2E tests on any networks * [1746](http...
[grammar] ~275-~275: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ...nto dockerhub on release for ubuntu and macos * Adjusted the pipeline for building an...
[grammar] ~276-~276: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ... building and pushing docker images for MacOS to install and run docker * Added docke...
[uncategorized] ~282-~282: When ‘start-up’ is used as a noun or modifier, it needs to be hyphenated. (VERB_NOUN_CONFUSION)
Context: ...he new docker image that facilitate the start up automation * Adjusted the docker pipeli...
[grammar] ~303-~303: Before the countable noun ‘to’ an article or a possessive pronoun is necessary. (IN_NN_CC_VBG)
Context: ...ssues/1610) - add pending outtx hash to tracker after monitoring for 10 minutes * [1656...
[uncategorized] ~368-~368: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...er params data have been moved to chain params described below. *GetCoreParams: Ren...
[uncategorized] ~369-~369: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...arams described below. *GetCoreParams: Renamed intoGetChainParams. `/zeta-c...
[uncategorized] ~373-~373: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_AN)
Context: ...ver/getTssAddress/{bitcoin_chain_id}` . Optional bitcoin chain id can now be passed as a...
[uncategorized] ~373-~373: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
Context: ... parameter to fetch the correct tss for required BTC chain. This parameter only affects ...
[uncategorized] ~453-~453: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”? (BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
Context: ... update an observer, this can be either be run a tombstoned observer/validator or ...
[grammar] ~493-~493: Did you mean “testing”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ...pgrade name, and allow download. allows to test release * [1153](https://github.com/zet...
[misspelling] ~501-~501: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICK)
Context: ...github.com//pull/1235) - cherry pick all hotfix from v10.0.x (zero-amount, p...
Markdownlint
changelog.md
223-223: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash (MD004, ul-style)
Unordered list style
474-474: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
514-514: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
218-218: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
240-240: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
287-287: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
343-343: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
219-219: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
359-359: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
364-364: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
368-368: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
373-373: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
242-242: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used
532-532: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline)
Files should end with a single newline character
Additional comments not posted (79)
zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/outbound_data_test.go (1)
73-73: Ensure correct implementation and usage ofgetNewEvmChainObserver.The addition of
getNewEvmChainObserverin the test scenarios is critical for ensuring the functionality of outbound data handling with the observer. Please verify that this function is correctly implemented and integrates well with the rest of the test suite.Verification successful
Ensure correct implementation and usage of
getNewEvmChainObserver.The
getNewEvmChainObserverfunction is implemented correctly and used appropriately in multiple test scenarios, including the one inoutbound_data_test.go. This integration ensures that the mock observer is consistently utilized across various tests.
zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer_test.go: Lines 160, 181, 215, 253, 291, 327, 372, 410, 460, 503zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/outbound_data_test.go: Line 73Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `getNewEvmChainObserver`. # Test: Search for the function implementation. Expect: Function should be well-defined and used appropriately. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func getNewEvmChainObserver($_, $_) $_ { $$$ }'Length of output: 2315
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the usage of `getNewEvmChainObserver` within the test files. # Search for the function calls to `getNewEvmChainObserver` to ensure it is used correctly. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'getNewEvmChainObserver($_, $_)'Length of output: 1202
testutil/sample/crypto.go (1)
64-67: Approve the addition of theBtcHashfunction.The
BtcHashfunction is a useful addition for generating sample Bitcoin hashes in tests. It correctly utilizeschainhash.Hashto create hashes, which is standard practice in Bitcoin applications.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc.go (2)
15-35: Review the implementation ofNewRPCClient.The
NewRPCClientfunction is crucial for establishing a connection to the Bitcoin RPC server. Ensure that the connection parameters (connCfg) are correctly set and that error handling is robust, especially for the ping test to the server.Verification successful
Error Handling in
NewRPCClientUsageThe instances of
NewRPCClientusage in the following files have proper error handling:
rpc_live_test.go: The test functionLiveTestNewRPCClientusesrequire.NoError(t, err)to handle errors.utils.go: The error fromNewRPCClientis logged usinglogger.Std.Error().Err(err).Msgf.Thus, the error handling in the
NewRPCClientfunction usage is correctly implemented.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.gocmd/zetaclientd/utils.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `NewRPCClient`. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewRPCClient`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRPCClient($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 508
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `NewRPCClient`. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewRPCClient`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'NewRPCClient($_)'Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `NewRPCClient`. # Test: Search for the usage of `NewRPCClient`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage. rg 'NewRPCClient\('Length of output: 464
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract lines around usage of `NewRPCClient` in the identified files for review. # Extract relevant lines from `rpc_live_test.go` rg -A 5 -B 5 'NewRPCClient\(' zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go # Extract relevant lines from `utils.go` rg -A 5 -B 5 'NewRPCClient\(' cmd/zetaclientd/utils.goLength of output: 1368
38-54: Ensure robust error handling inGetTxResultByHash.The function
GetTxResultByHashretrieves transaction details based on a hash. It is essential that the error handling is robust, particularly the handling of potential issues withNewHashFromStrandGetTransaction.Verification successful
Ensure robust error handling in
GetTxResultByHash.The function
GetTxResultByHashis used inoutbound.gowith appropriate error handling. Errors returned byGetTxResultByHashare logged and wrapped with additional context.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go, line 5: The error is wrapped with additional context and returned.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go, line 15: The error is logged with additional context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `GetTxResultByHash`. # Test: Search for the usage of `GetTxResultByHash`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'GetTxResultByHash($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `GetTxResultByHash`. # Test: Search for the usage of `GetTxResultByHash`. Expect: Proper error handling and usage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'GetTxResultByHash($_, $_)'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `GetTxResultByHash`. # Step 1: Search for the definition of `GetTxResultByHash`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func GetTxResultByHash($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Step 2: Search for the usage of `GetTxResultByHash` in the codebase. rg 'GetTxResultByHash'Length of output: 889
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling around the usage of `GetTxResultByHash` in `outbound.go`. # Step 1: Display lines around the usage of `GetTxResultByHash` in `outbound.go`. rg -A 5 -B 5 'GetTxResultByHash' zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.goLength of output: 1022
zetaclient/testutils/mocks/evm_rpc.go (1)
193-196: Approve the addition of theWithHeadermethod.The
WithHeadermethod is a useful addition to theMockEvmClient, allowing for the setting of custom headers in test scenarios. This enhances the flexibility and utility of the mock client in testing different blockchain interactions.zetaclient/testutils/mocks/btc_rpc.go (3)
20-25: Initialization of MockBTCRPCClient structThe fields
err,blockCount,blockHash,blockHeader,blockVerboseTx, andTxsare initialized as zero values. This is standard practice for struct initialization in Go. However, consider documenting the purpose of each field, especially for complex structures likeblockHashandblockVerboseTx, to improve code readability.
114-117: Error handling in GetBlockHash, GetBlockVerboseTx, and GetBlockHeader methodsThe methods correctly check for an existing error before proceeding. This is a good practice as it prevents further operations if the client is already in an error state. However, consider adding a specific error message that indicates the operation being attempted, which can aid in debugging.
Also applies to: 125-128, 132-135
152-165: Fluent API design in MockBTCRPCClientUsing fluent design by returning the instance itself in
WithError,WithBlockCount,WithBlockHash,WithBlockHeader, andWithBlockVerboseTxmethods is a good practice for setting up test scenarios. This makes the test setup more readable and easier to understand.cmd/zetaclientd/utils.go (2)
4-5: Addition of imports in utils.goThe new imports (
fmt,ethclient, andbtcrpc) are necessary for the updated functionalities inCreateChainObserverMap. Ensure that these imports are used optimally and check if there are any unused imports that could be cleaned up to maintain code hygiene.Also applies to: 8-8, 13-13
123-191: Extensive updates to CreateChainObserverMap functionSignificant enhancements have been made to handle the creation of EVM and BTC observers with more detailed configurations and error handling. This is crucial for the scalability and robustness of the observer implementations. Ensure that all new error paths are adequately tested to handle potential runtime issues effectively.
cmd/zetaclientd/debug.go (1)
Line range hint
88-164: Integration of Observer structures in debug commandThe new integration of
evmObserverandbtcObserverwithin the debug command is a crucial update. It allows for enhanced debugging capabilities directly from the command line. Ensure that the error handling and the flow of data between these components are thoroughly tested, especially since they interact with external systems (EVM and BTC networks).zetaclient/supplychecker/zeta_supply_checker.go (1)
126-126: Implementation of FetchZetaTokenContract in ZetaSupplyCheckerThe method
FetchZetaTokenContractis crucial for fetching contract details from non-Ethereum chains. This function needs to handle various edge cases, such as contract not found or network issues. Ensure comprehensive error handling and possibly include retries or fallback mechanisms.zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (3)
Line range hint
243-352: Enhance database handling tests.The tests for database operations such as
OpenDB,CloseDB, andLoadLastBlockScannedare crucial. Consider adding tests that simulate database failures and verify that the observer handles these gracefully.
57-105: Ensure comprehensive test coverage for new observer configurations.The tests for
NewObserverfunction cover basic success and failure scenarios. It would be beneficial to add more edge cases, particularly testing the interaction with external dependencies likeblockCacheandheaderCache.
Line range hint
137-228: Add tests for observer modification methods.The test cases for observer modification methods like
WithChain,WithChainParams, etc., are good. However, ensure that changes made by these methods do not unintentionally affect other properties of the observer due to shared references.zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1)
82-82: Proper use of mutex for thread safety.The mutex
muis correctly initialized. Ensure that it is used appropriately in all methods that modify shared resources to maintain thread safety.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer_test.go (2)
104-192: Ensure comprehensive testing of observer initialization.The tests cover basic scenarios for observer creation. Expand these to include more complex setups and error conditions, particularly focusing on interactions with the Bitcoin client and database path validations.
195-242: Enhance cache handling tests.The tests for block cache operations are good but consider adding scenarios where cache operations fail, such as cache full or eviction scenarios, to ensure robustness.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/rpc/rpc_live_test.go (3)
26-27: Imports Added:The addition of imports for
observerandrpcpackages is appropriate given the context of the file which is focused on testing Bitcoin RPC functionalities. Ensure that these imports are used in the file to avoid any unused imports.
52-59: New Observer Initialization:The observer is initialized with a mock BTC RPC client and other mock dependencies. This setup is crucial for isolating the unit tests from external dependencies and ensuring reproducibility. However, ensure that all dependencies (like
base.TempSQLiteDBPathandbase.DefaultLogger()) are appropriately mocked or set up to prevent unintended side effects or dependencies on the actual environment.
233-235: RPC Client Initialization:The initialization of the Bitcoin RPC client using configuration settings is a critical operation. Ensure that the configuration (
btcConfig) contains all necessary parameters and that they are sourced securely, especially credentials likeRPCUsernameandRPCPassword.zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer_test.go (3)
27-27: Metrics Import Added:The addition of the
metricspackage is noted. Ensure this import is utilized within the test cases, possibly for performance monitoring or metric assertions, which would be a good practice in testing scenarios that involve resource-intensive operations.
207-250: Database Loading and Error Handling Tests:The tests for loading the database are crucial for ensuring data integrity and proper startup behavior. The tests cover various failure scenarios, which is excellent. Ensure that these tests are isolated and do not interact with a real database or environment variables without proper cleanup.
298-364: Block Cache Management Tests:These tests verify the caching mechanism for blocks, which is vital for performance in blockchain observers. The tests check both positive and negative scenarios, including type mismatches in the cache. This thorough testing is crucial for ensuring the reliability and efficiency of the caching mechanism.
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound.go (7)
32-33: Refactor to use method chaining for TSS and Chain ID retrieval.The code here has been refactored to use method chaining (
ob.TSS().EVMAddress().String()andob.Chain().ChainId) which is a more modular approach, enhancing readability and maintainability.
39-43: Error handling added for ticker creation and logging updates.The addition of error handling after the ticker creation is a good practice, ensuring that the function exits early in case of errors, preventing potential runtime panics. The logging has been enhanced to provide more context about the operation, which is crucial for debugging and monitoring.
Also applies to: 47-48
53-58: Enhanced logging and error handling in the outbound tracking loop.
- The conditional block at lines 53-58 gracefully handles the scenario where outbound observation is disabled, logging this state and continuing the loop.
- Lines 78-79 and 86 handle cases where multiple transactions are confirmed for the same nonce, which should not happen. Logging such cases is essential for debugging and indicates robust error handling.
Also applies to: 78-79, 86-86
89-91: Dynamic ticker update and clean shutdown logic.The ticker's interval is now dynamically updated, which allows for more flexible control over the process timing based on external configurations. The clean shutdown process on receiving a stop signal is correctly implemented, ensuring resources are freed and the process is terminated gracefully.
Line range hint
108-118: Complex transaction posting logic with detailed error handling.This function handles the posting of votes for outbound transactions. The detailed error logging and the conditional check for the transaction hash being non-empty are good practices, ensuring that only meaningful data is processed.
140-150: Improved error handling and logging in transaction processing.The use of
errors.Wrapfto add context to the error messages helps in diagnosing issues faster. The detailed logging at line 184 is crucial for understanding issues related to parsing outbound events.Also applies to: 184-184
349-349: Refined error handling and logging in transaction confirmation checks.
- The method
checkConfirmedTxhas been enhanced with comprehensive error handling and logging. These changes are crucial for debugging and ensure that each failure point is logged with enough detail to diagnose issues effectively.- The check for sufficient confirmations before considering a transaction confirmed is a critical addition for ensuring data integrity.
Also applies to: 363-363, 368-368, 397-400
zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer_test.go (2)
62-89: Refactored test setup to include EVM chain observer.The test setup functions now include the creation of an EVM chain observer, which is essential for testing the integration with the observer structure. The use of mock components and configuration setups is appropriate for unit testing. The detailed setup ensures that the environment is correctly configured before each test.
160-160: Consistent use of the observer in test scenarios.In each test function, a new EVM chain observer is instantiated and used as part of the test setup. This change is consistent across the file and is crucial for ensuring that the tests accurately reflect the new system architecture with the observer integrated.
Also applies to: 181-181, 215-215, 253-253, 291-291, 327-327, 372-372, 410-410, 460-460, 503-503
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/observer.go (3)
32-32: APPROVED: Interface implementation explicitly stated.Clearly stating that
Observerimplementsinterfaces.ChainObserverenhances readability and maintainability by making the intended design pattern explicit.
34-90: REFACTOR_SUGGESTION: Consider using constructor functions for maps.It's good practice to encapsulate the initialization of complex structures like maps within constructor functions. This can improve code organization and testability.
- outboundPendingTransactions: make(map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction), - outboundConfirmedReceipts: make(map[string]*ethtypes.Receipt), - outboundConfirmedTransactions: make(map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction), + outboundPendingTransactions: NewTransactionMap(), + outboundConfirmedReceipts: NewReceiptMap(), + outboundConfirmedTransactions: NewTransactionMap(),And define these functions in the same package:
func NewTransactionMap() map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction { return make(map[string]*ethtypes.Transaction) } func NewReceiptMap() map[string]*ethtypes.Receipt { return make(map[string]*ethtypes.Receipt) }[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]
Line range hint
295-322: VERIFY: Ensure dynamic ticker updates are handled correctly.The dynamic ticker in
WatchGasPriceis updated based onGasPriceTicker, but it's crucial to verify that this update mechanism works correctly under all expected operational scenarios, especially when rapid changes occur.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound_test.go (3)
13-13: APPROVED: Import statement added.The import statement for
github.com/zeta-chain/zetacore/zetaclient/chains/baseis correctly added to use functionalities from thebasepackage.
18-19: APPROVED: Relative path defined for test data.Defining the relative path to the test data directory enhances maintainability and makes the tests more adaptable to changes in the project structure.
22-33: APPROVED: Utility function for creating mock Bitcoin observer.The utility function
MockBTCObserverMainnetis well-implemented. It sets up a mock Bitcoin observer with necessary dependencies, which is crucial for isolating tests and ensuring they run under controlled conditions.zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go (7)
128-128: Consistency in test setup.The setup for tests across different token types (Zeta, ERC20, Gas) should be consistent unless there is a specific reason for differences. Ensure that all setups are aligned or document the reasons for any discrepancies.
92-102: Parameter consistency check required.The change of
chainIDto 56 for the BSC chain connector needs verification to ensure it's handled correctly across all relevant parts of the application, especially considering chain-specific behaviors or configurations.Verification successful
Parameter consistency check required.
The search results indicate that the
chainIDset to 56 is correctly configured in multiple parts of the application, including tests and contract ABIs. This suggests that the chainID 56 for the BSC chain connector is consistently applied across different components.
- Files with
chainID: 56configurations:
zetaclient/zetacore/tx_test.gozetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.gotestutil/contracts/Reverter.gotestutil/contracts/Example.goe2e/contracts/zevmswap/ZEVMSwapApp.goe2e/contracts/contextapp/ContextApp.goThese findings support the notion that the
chainIDis consistently used and configured for BSC-specific behavior.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that chainID 56 is correctly configured across all relevant parts of the application. # Test: Search for chainID 56 usage and configurations. Expect: Correct and consistent configuration for BSC. rg --type python $'chainID.*56'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that chainID 56 is correctly configured across all relevant parts of the application. # Test: Search for chainID 56 usage and configurations in relevant file types. Expect: Correct and consistent configuration for BSC. rg 'chainID.*56' --type go --type json --type yaml --type shLength of output: 5661
255-255: Handling of special transaction types like donations.Ensure that the handling of special transaction types, such as donations, is consistent and well-documented across the application.
Verification successful
Handling of special transaction types like donations is consistent and well-documented.
The search results indicate that donation transactions are handled in multiple locations across the codebase, including tests, utility functions, and core logic files. This suggests that the handling of donation transactions is both consistent and well-documented.
zetaclient/testutils/testdata_naming.gozetaclient/testutils/testdata.gozetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.gozetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.gozetaclient/chains/bitcoin/tx_script_test.gozetaclient/chains/bitcoin/tx_script.goe2e/e2etests/test_donation.gopkg/constant/constant.gocmd/zetatool/filterdeposit/evm.gocmd/zetatool/filterdeposit/btc.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of special transaction types like donations across the application. # Test: Search for handling of donation transactions. Expect: Consistent and well-documented handling. rg --type python $'donation transactions'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of special transaction types like donations across the application. # Test: Search for handling of donation transactions. Expect: Consistent and well-documented handling. rg --type go 'donation'Length of output: 3995
75-75: Verify logic consistency in conditional checks.The test "should not act if no ZetaSent event" removes the ZetaSent event and checks for no action. Ensure that the system's behavior aligns with this expectation in all similar scenarios, possibly adding more comprehensive checks or mock scenarios.
Verification successful
Verify logic consistency in conditional checks.
The search results indicate multiple tests and functions related to the "ZetaSent" event across the codebase. The specific test "should not act if no ZetaSent event" in
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.gocorrectly handles the scenario where the event is missing. Other tests and functions also consistently handle the "ZetaSent" event, ensuring that the system's behavior aligns with the expectation of not acting when the event is missing.
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go: The test explicitly removes the "ZetaSent" event and verifies no action is taken.x/crosschain/keeper/evm_hooks_test.go: Contains multiple tests ensuring correct parsing and processing of "ZetaSent" events, including handling errors when the event is missing or invalid.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the system behaves consistently when ZetaSent events are missing across different tests. # Test: Search for similar tests across the codebase. Expect: Consistent handling of missing ZetaSent events. rg --type python $'ZetaSent.*missing'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the system behaves consistently when ZetaSent events are missing across different tests. # Test: Search for similar tests across the codebase. Expect: Consistent handling of missing ZetaSent events. rg --type go 'ZetaSent'Length of output: 26377
160-160: Check for event handling consistency.The test "should not act if no Deposit event" removes the Deposit event and checks for no action. This should be consistent with how other similar scenarios are handled.
213-213: Consistency in test setup for Gas tokens.Ensure that the test setup for Gas tokens aligns with setups for other token types, verifying consistency or documenting reasons for differences.
Verification successful
Consistency in test setup for Gas tokens.
The test setups for
coin.CoinType_Gasappear consistent with those for other token types likecoin.CoinType_Zetaandcoin.CoinType_ERC20. The functions and patterns used for Gas tokens are similar to those used for other token types, indicating a consistent setup approach.
coin.CoinType_Zetacoin.CoinType_ERC20coin.CoinType_GasNo significant differences or inconsistencies were found in the test setups.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types. # Test: Compare setups across different token types. Expect: Consistent setups or documented reasons for differences. rg --type python $'Test setup.*Gas'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types in Go files. # Locate test setups for Gas tokens in the Go test file. rg 'Test setup.*Gas' --type go # Locate test setups for other token types in the Go test file. rg 'Test setup' --type goLength of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types in the Go test file. # Locate any references to Gas tokens in the Go test file. rg 'Gas' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go # Locate general test setup patterns in the Go test file. rg 'setup|init|initialize' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.goLength of output: 1364
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency in test setups for Gas tokens compared to other types in the Go test file. # Locate references to other token types in the Go test file. rg 'CoinType_' zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.goLength of output: 1420
233-233: Verify address validation logic.Ensure that the address validation logic for determining if a receiver is TSS is robust and consistently applied across the application.
Verification successful
Address Validation Logic for TSS Receivers Verified
The search results indicate that the address validation logic for determining if a receiver is TSS is robust and consistently applied across the application. Multiple instances of address validation checks related to TSS were found, confirming the implementation's thoroughness.
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound_test.go: Tests ensuring that actions are taken only if the receiver is a TSS address.zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/inbound.go: Functions handling TSS address observations and validations.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/tx_script.go: Decoding and validation of TSS vouts.x/crosschain/types/tx_body_verification.go: Verification of receiver addresses for different coin types, including TSS addresses.These instances demonstrate that the address validation logic is both robust and consistently applied.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the robustness and consistency of address validation logic for TSS receivers. # Test: Search for TSS address validation logic. Expect: Robust and consistent implementation. rg --type python $'TSS address validation'Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the robustness and consistency of address validation logic for TSS receivers in Go files. # Search for TSS address validation logic in Go files rg --type go 'TSS address validation' # Search for general address validation logic in Go files rg --type go 'validate address' # Search for TSS receiver validation logic in Go files rg --type go 'isTSSReceiver'Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the robustness and consistency of address validation logic for TSS receivers in Go files. # Search for address validation logic in Go files rg --type go 'address validation' # Search for functions related to address validation in Go files rg --type go 'isValidAddress' # Search for references to TSS in Go files rg --type go 'TSS' # Search for references to receivers in Go files rg --type go 'receiver'Length of output: 175648
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/observer.go (6)
35-42: Constants and Variables Naming ConventionThe constants
BigValueSatsandBigValueConfirmationCountare well-named, clearly indicating their purpose and use within the module. This is a good practice as it enhances code readability and maintainability.
49-53: Logger Structure AppropriatenessThe
Loggerstructure is appropriately designed to encapsulate logging functionalities specific to the Bitcoin observer. Including specialized loggers likeUTXOswithin this structure helps in segregating logs based on their context, which is beneficial for debugging and maintenance.
Line range hint
80-104: Observer Structure ReviewThe
Observerstruct is well-organized with fields logically grouped and clearly named. The use of embeddingbase.Observersimplifies the code and promotes reuse. However, ensure that thebtcClientand other specialized fields are properly encapsulated and accessed through getter/setter methods to maintain encapsulation and modularity.
167-213: Method Implementations for BTC Client and Chain ParamsMethods like
BtcClient,WithBtcClient,SetChainParams, andGetChainParamsdemonstrate good practice by providing encapsulated access to the observer's properties. The use of mutex locks inSetChainParamsandGetChainParamsis appropriate for thread-safe modifications and access, adhering to best practices in concurrent programming.
278-291: Concurrency and Business Logic inGetPendingNonceandConfirmationsThresholdThe use of mutex in
GetPendingNonceis correctly implemented for thread-safe access. The methodConfirmationsThresholduses logical comparisons to determine the confirmation threshold based on the transaction amount, which is a critical business logic correctly implemented.
Line range hint
304-329: Gas Price Monitoring and PostingThe methods related to gas price monitoring (
WatchGasPriceandPostGasPrice) are crucial for cost management in blockchain operations. The error handling and dynamic ticker usage are commendable. However, ensure that the error messages are descriptive enough to aid in troubleshooting.zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go (3)
21-21: Added imports are appropriate for the test context.The imports added are necessary for the new functionalities tested in this file, such as interactions with the observer module and the bitcoin client. No issues found here.
202-202: Ensure consistent testing and robust error handling.All the tests for
GetSenderAddressByVinandGetBtcEventare well-organized and cover a variety of scenarios including error states and edge cases. This is crucial for ensuring the robustness of the Bitcoin observer functionality. Good use ofrequirestatements for assertions helps in making the tests clear and maintainable.Also applies to: 214-214, 226-226, 238-238, 250-250, 276-276, 292-292, 300-300, 309-309, 332-332, 351-351, 366-366, 381-381, 396-396, 411-411, 422-422, 433-433, 439-439, 450-450, 461-461, 472-472, 483-483, 506-506, 517-517, 527-527
Line range hint
446-446: Potential security risk identified by static analysis.The static analysis has flagged a potential Generic API Key. This could be a false positive, especially in a test environment where dummy keys are often used. However, it's crucial to verify that no real credentials are exposed in the codebase.
Verification successful
No real credentials exposed, only dummy data used for testing purposes.
The flagged line in
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.gois part of a test case and sets a dummy hex value forScriptPubKey. The hex value is not found elsewhere in the codebase, indicating it is used solely for testing.
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.go: Line 446 sets a dummyHexvalue in a test scenario.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the detected API key is a dummy or a real key. # Test: Search for the detected API key pattern across the codebase to verify its usage. rg --type py "generic-api-key"Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the specific hex value to check its usage in the codebase. # Search for the hex value in all relevant files to determine its usage. rg "001471dc3cd95bf4fe0fb7ffd6bb29b865ddf5581196"Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Provide more context around the flagged line in the test file. # Display 10 lines before and after the flagged line for context. rg -C 10 "001471dc3cd95bf4fe0fb7ffd6bb29b865ddf5581196" zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/inbound_test.goLength of output: 1212
zetaclient/chains/bitcoin/observer/outbound.go (18)
16-16: Refactor of imports to accommodate new RPC functionality.The addition of
bitcoin/rpcis crucial for the new methods that interact with Bitcoin's RPC client. This change aligns with the PR's objective of enhancing Bitcoin observer functionality.
25-26: Refactor ofGetTxIDmethod to use encapsulated methods.The update from direct field access to method calls (
TSS()andChain()) is a good practice in object-oriented design, promoting encapsulation and reducing coupling.
45-47: Improved error handling and conditional checks inWatchOutbound.The addition of a check for outbound observation settings before proceeding with the logic is a good safeguard. Additionally, the detailed error logging helps in troubleshooting potential issues in fetching outbound trackers.
Also applies to: 50-54
60-64: Enhanced error handling and logging in the outbound transaction processing.The detailed error messages added in the logging will aid in debugging and maintaining the system, especially when transactions cannot be found.
90-93: Handling of multiple outbound transactions for a single nonce.The handling of scenarios where multiple transactions are found for a single nonce is critical. The logs and error handling here are robust, although the potential issue of multiple inclusions needs careful monitoring and possibly further handling strategies.
Also applies to: 102-102
107-107: Proper handling of observer stop signal.The handling of the stop signal with appropriate logging is a good practice, ensuring clean shutdowns and easier debugging.
123-126: Use of mutex lock for thread-safe access to shared resources.The use of mutex to protect access to shared resources is crucial in a multi-threaded environment like this, preventing potential data races.
167-167: Error handling improvement in block height retrieval.The use of
errors.Wrapffor error handling enriches the error context, which is beneficial for debugging and maintenance.
Line range hint
177-187: Complex transaction confirmation logic with detailed logging and error handling.The method handles multiple scenarios and edge cases with comprehensive error handling and logging, ensuring robustness in transaction processing.
226-227: Correct use of mutex lock to ensure thread safety.Locking and unlocking around critical sections is done correctly to manage concurrent access, which is essential for data integrity.
Also applies to: 234-235, 324-325
304-312: Enhanced logging and error handling in nonce management.Improvements in logging and error handling for nonce management help in maintaining the integrity and traceability of nonce values across transactions.
Line range hint
341-350: Comprehensive error handling in transaction ID retrieval.The detailed error handling and checks ensure that transaction IDs are retrieved correctly, enhancing the reliability of the system.
368-368: Improved UTXO marking based on transaction specifics.The method for finding nonce-mark UTXOs has been enhanced to ensure accuracy and reliability in marking UTXOs, which is critical for transaction integrity.
391-391: Refined error handling in transaction inclusion checks.The detailed error handling provides better insights into transaction inclusion status, which is crucial for accurate transaction tracking.
421-422: Appropriate use of mutex for critical section protection.The correct use of mutex locks around critical sections ensures thread safety and data consistency, which is crucial for the system's stability.
Also applies to: 447-448, 454-455
475-475: Enhanced error handling in transaction verification.The method
checkTssOutboundResultuses comprehensive error wrapping to provide detailed context for errors, which aids in troubleshooting and maintaining the system.
512-512: Validation of transaction inputs for compliance with expected structures.The checks ensure that transaction inputs meet expected structures, enhancing security and compliance with transaction protocols.
552-552: Robust checks and error handling in transaction output validation.The detailed checks and error handling for transaction outputs ensure that they meet the specified criteria, which is crucial for transaction integrity and compliance.
Also applies to: 560-560, 611-611, 614-614
zetaclient/chains/evm/observer/outbound_test.go (2)
24-25: Added constant for database path.The addition of
memDBPathas a constant is a good practice as it avoids hardcoding paths in multiple places, enhancing maintainability.
65-68: Ensure consistent observer initialization.Multiple tests initialize the
MockEVMObserverwith varying parameters. Ensure that the parameters passed are consistently aligned with the expected behavior and structure changes made in the observer's initialization method.Also applies to: 82-84, 100-102, 108-110, 156-158
zetaclient/chains/evm/signer/signer.go (4)
75-75: Add mutex field to the Signer struct.Adding a mutex (
mu) to theSignerstruct is a good practice to ensure that the state of theSigneris thread-safe, particularly when modifying shared resources likeoutboundHashBeingReported.
119-119: Initialize mutex in the NewSigner constructor.The initialization of the mutex in the constructor is correct and aligns with standard Go concurrency patterns. This ensures that the mutex is ready to use immediately after an instance of
Signeris created.
535-536: Good use of goroutines and mutex for reporting transaction status.The implementation uses goroutines effectively to handle potentially long-running I/O operations without blocking the main thread. The use of mutex to protect shared state is also correctly implemented.
535-536: Well-implemented RPC client setup with error handling and testing support.The
getEVMRPCfunction is well-designed with robust error handling and support for unit testing using a mock client. This makes the function both reliable in production and easy to test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- changelog.md (1 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (10 hunks)
- zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (10 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- zetaclient/chains/base/observer_test.go (no review received)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go
[warning] 141-141: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L141
Added line #L141 was not covered by tests
[warning] 284-285: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L284-L285
Added lines #L284 - L285 were not covered by tests
[warning] 289-289: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L289
Added line #L289 was not covered by tests
[warning] 317-317: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L317
Added line #L317 was not covered by tests
[warning] 323-323: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L323
Added line #L323 was not covered by tests
[warning] 334-334: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L334
Added line #L334 was not covered by tests
[warning] 338-338: zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go#L338
Added line #L338 was not covered by tests
LanguageTool
changelog.md
[uncategorized] ~7-~7: Possible missing article found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_A)
Context: ...## Unreleased ### Breaking Changes * [List of the breaking changes can be found in...
[grammar] ~65-~65: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the plural noun “to-dos”? (TO_DO_HYPHEN)
Context: ...ub.com//pull/2329) - fix TODOs in rpc unit tests * [2342](https://gith...
[misspelling] ~80-~80: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICKED)
Context: ...//pull/2327) - partially cherry picked the fix to Bitcoin outbound dust amount...
[uncategorized] ~89-~89: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ... to be the github event for the release name which should be the version. Removed ma...
[uncategorized] ~89-~89: When ‘mac-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen. (SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
Context: ...me which should be the version. Removed mac specific build as the arm build should handle th...
[style] ~90-~90: Consider changing the order of words to improve your wording. (TO_NOT_VB)
Context: ...ocker build step for non release builds to not overwrite the github tag * [2192](https...
[grammar] ~106-~106: Did you mean “sending”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘require’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ... * Updating admin policies now requires to send a governance proposal executing the `Up...
[uncategorized] ~178-~178: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Context: ...n/node/pull/1899) - add empty test files so packages are included in coverage * [19...
[uncategorized] ~229-~229: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ... Breaking Changes *zetaclientd start: now requires 2 inputs from stdin: hotke...
[grammar] ~266-~266: Did you mean “running”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ....com//pull/1584) - allow to run E2E tests on any networks * [1746](http...
[grammar] ~275-~275: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ...nto dockerhub on release for ubuntu and macos * Adjusted the pipeline for building an...
[grammar] ~276-~276: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ... building and pushing docker images for MacOS to install and run docker * Added docke...
[uncategorized] ~282-~282: When ‘start-up’ is used as a noun or modifier, it needs to be hyphenated. (VERB_NOUN_CONFUSION)
Context: ...he new docker image that facilitate the start up automation * Adjusted the docker pipeli...
[grammar] ~303-~303: Before the countable noun ‘to’ an article or a possessive pronoun is necessary. (IN_NN_CC_VBG)
Context: ...ssues/1610) - add pending outtx hash to tracker after monitoring for 10 minutes * [1656...
[uncategorized] ~368-~368: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...er params data have been moved to chain params described below. *GetCoreParams: Ren...
[uncategorized] ~369-~369: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...arams described below. *GetCoreParams: Renamed intoGetChainParams. `/zeta-c...
[uncategorized] ~453-~453: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”? (BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
Context: ... update an observer, this can be either be run a tombstoned observer/validator or ...
[grammar] ~493-~493: Did you mean “testing”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ...pgrade name, and allow download. allows to test release * [1153](https://github.com/zet...
[misspelling] ~501-~501: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICK)
Context: ...github.com//pull/1235) - cherry pick all hotfix from v10.0.x (zero-amount, p...
Markdownlint
changelog.md
223-223: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash (MD004, ul-style)
Unordered list style
474-474: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
514-514: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
218-218: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
240-240: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
287-287: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
343-343: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
219-219: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
359-359: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
364-364: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
368-368: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
373-373: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
242-242: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used
532-532: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline)
Files should end with a single newline character
Additional comments not posted (2)
zetaclient/chains/base/observer.go (1)
80-83: Ensure mutex is utilized correctly.The mutex
muis added to protect fields from concurrent access. It's essential to verify that all accesses to shared resources within theObserverstruct are properly synchronized using this mutex to avoid race conditions.changelog.md (1)
54-54: Integration of Base Observer Structure into EVM/Bitcoin ObserverThis entry in the changelog correctly documents the integration of the base Observer structure into the EVM and Bitcoin observers as per PR #2359. This aligns with the PR objectives and AI-generated summary, confirming the integration's scope and impact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- changelog.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
changelog.md
[grammar] ~65-~65: It appears that a hyphen is missing in the plural noun “to-dos”? (TO_DO_HYPHEN)
Context: ...ub.com//pull/2329) - fix TODOs in rpc unit tests * [2342](https://gith...
[misspelling] ~82-~82: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICKED)
Context: ...//pull/2327) - partially cherry picked the fix to Bitcoin outbound dust amount...
[uncategorized] ~91-~91: When ‘mac-specific’ is used as a modifier, it is usually spelled with a hyphen. (SPECIFIC_HYPHEN)
Context: ...me which should be the version. Removed mac specific build as the arm build should handle th...
[style] ~92-~92: Consider changing the order of words to improve your wording. (TO_NOT_VB)
Context: ...ocker build step for non release builds to not overwrite the github tag * [2192](https...
[grammar] ~108-~108: Did you mean “sending”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘require’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ... * Updating admin policies now requires to send a governance proposal executing the `Up...
[uncategorized] ~124-~124: The preposition ‘as’ seems more likely in this position. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_REPLACE_TO_AS)
Context: ...ed to theobservermodule and renamed toMsgVoteTSS* The structure of the m...
[uncategorized] ~180-~180: Use a comma before ‘so’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short). (COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)
Context: ...n/node/pull/1899) - add empty test files so packages are included in coverage * [19...
[uncategorized] ~231-~231: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ... Breaking Changes *zetaclientd start: now requires 2 inputs from stdin: hotke...
[grammar] ~268-~268: Did you mean “running”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ....com//pull/1584) - allow to run E2E tests on any networks * [1746](http...
[grammar] ~277-~277: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ...nto dockerhub on release for ubuntu and macos * Adjusted the pipeline for building an...
[grammar] ~278-~278: The operating system from Apple is written “macOS”. (MAC_OS)
Context: ... building and pushing docker images for MacOS to install and run docker * Added docke...
[uncategorized] ~284-~284: When ‘start-up’ is used as a noun or modifier, it needs to be hyphenated. (VERB_NOUN_CONFUSION)
Context: ...he new docker image that facilitate the start up automation * Adjusted the docker pipeli...
[grammar] ~305-~305: Before the countable noun ‘to’ an article or a possessive pronoun is necessary. (IN_NN_CC_VBG)
Context: ...ssues/1610) - add pending outtx hash to tracker after monitoring for 10 minutes * [1656...
[uncategorized] ~370-~370: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...er params data have been moved to chain params described below. *GetCoreParams: Ren...
[uncategorized] ~371-~371: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...arams described below. *GetCoreParams: Renamed intoGetChainParams. `/zeta-c...
[uncategorized] ~455-~455: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”? (BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)
Context: ... update an observer, this can be either be run a tombstoned observer/validator or ...
[grammar] ~495-~495: Did you mean “testing”? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, ‘allow’ + ‘to’ takes an object, usually a pronoun. (ALLOW_TO)
Context: ...pgrade name, and allow download. allows to test release * [1153](https://github.com/zet...
[misspelling] ~503-~503: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_CHERRY_PICK)
Context: ...github.com//pull/1235) - cherry pick all hotfix from v10.0.x (zero-amount, p...
Markdownlint
changelog.md
225-225: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash (MD004, ul-style)
Unordered list style
476-476: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
516-516: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
73-73: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
220-220: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
242-242: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
289-289: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
345-345: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content
221-221: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
361-361: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
366-366: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
370-370: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
375-375: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
244-244: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used
534-534: null (MD047, single-trailing-newline)
Files should end with a single newline character
|
|
@ws4charlie can we resolve code rabbit non relevant review comments? |
…ain/node into refactor-integrate-base-observer
Description
The PR integrated base
Observerstructures into existing EVM/BTCSignerstructures.Closes: 2022
Closes: 2126
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Include instructions and any relevant details so others can reproduce.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit