Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.density, .wavefunction should fail if not 0 < fxyz < 1 #102

Closed
zerothi opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

.density, .wavefunction should fail if not 0 < fxyz < 1 #102

zerothi opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@zerothi
Copy link
Owner

zerothi commented Dec 19, 2018

Describe the issue
Calculating the wavefunction for a grid with geometries having intrinsic coordinates outside the unit-cell box should fail.

This is because it isn't supported due to reasons dealing with "supercell" interactions.

@pfebrer
Copy link
Contributor

pfebrer commented Jul 20, 2021

I'm encountering this problem myself. I think at least a warning should be issued, because I was hitting my head against the wall trying to figure out why some part of my wavefunction was missing :) And this could get much worse as layers are built on top of this code.

pfebrer pushed a commit to pfebrer/sisl that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2021
I am not sure this will solve all problems.
Basically the problem I encountered refers
to systems where sc.origo is defined, that variable
does not have a unified meaning, but really should have.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants