forked from go-gitea/gitea
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
…tea#16576) Backport go-gitea#16576 This PR restores the vendored and patched dropdow from go-gitea#8638. It however, it partially abandons the call to `click()` using instead the default dropdown click calls instead. This prevents the issue of the dropdown grabbing focus permanently however, this may have negative effects on the effect of focus on the dropdowns. Of note, the behaviour of the template selector dropdown on the repo creation page is slightly odd - I don't believe that this odd behaviour is caused by this PR but rather by the feed source for this. I suspect that the dropdown should be adding a delete button to its selection. Fix go-gitea#15172 References: go-gitea#7057 Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
5 changed files
with
4,450 additions
and
10 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.