Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

boards: olimex stm32-e407: Fix pin number of RESET #6495

Conversation

rettichschnidi
Copy link
Contributor

According to STM32-E407.pdf (Revision I, June 2017), CON1 RST is
connected to processor pin #25, not #23.

Signed-off-by: Reto Schneider [email protected]

According to STM32-E407.pdf (Revision I, June 2017), CON1 RST is
connected to processor pin zephyrproject-rtos#25, not zephyrproject-rtos#23.

Signed-off-by: Reto Schneider <[email protected]>
@rettichschnidi rettichschnidi requested a review from dbkinder as a code owner March 6, 2018 23:02
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #6495 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #6495      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    53.2%   53.2%   +<.01%     
=========================================
  Files         436     436              
  Lines       41353   41353              
  Branches     7937    7937              
=========================================
+ Hits        22001   22002       +1     
+ Misses      16128   16127       -1     
  Partials     3224    3224
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
samples/philosophers/src/main.c 98.43% <0%> (+1.56%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 52e0494...24cf541. Read the comment docs.

@galak galak merged commit dfcf11f into zephyrproject-rtos:master Mar 6, 2018
@rettichschnidi rettichschnidi deleted the rettichschnidi-fix-olimex-stm32-e407-documentation branch March 7, 2018 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants