-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Misc cleanups #194
Misc cleanups #194
Conversation
Other than "feature gates are undesirable" (which I agree with), is there any motivation for 9146db9? The reason I went with |
rust-lang/rust#45198 used |
OK, I can see some instances of this idiom in the standard library (not many, but a few), so I'm semi-swayed. Let's use their precedent and call the attribute either |
Renamed and dropped doc comment. |
Please squash. |
434d817
to
55c643c
Compare
Splat |
bors r+ |
194: Misc cleanups r=ltratt a=bjorn3 Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
55c643c
to
06301d7
Compare
I dropped the first commit. Locally it showed an unused import warning and compiled fine with removing the import, but on CI it is necessary. |
bors r+ |
Build succeeded: |
Last PR for today. This time I didn't base it on any non-merged PR.