remove white spaces from unit names #56
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yaph
reviewed
Oct 23, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for looking into this! I think it's a little safer to replace whitespace with an underscore replace(/ /g, '_') to reduce the potential for name collisions. I know that just removing whitespace in identifiers has bitten me in the past. Do you have thoughts on this?
|
Indeed using an underscore is more safe, rerolled the pull request. |
|
Sorry, I should have kept the |
|
Thanks for your contribution Gerald! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removing white spaces makes it possible to use unit names. This makes it possible to use property "name" in topojson files instead of "fips" as discussed in issue #55.