docs: Set up docs site infra and refactor existing docs into the site. #127
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files to enhance project documentation, manage ignored files, and integrate a new submodule. Key updates include modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/index.md (1)
11-21: Consider combining the toctree directives.Having two separate toctree directives for related content may complicate maintenance. Consider combining them into a single directive.
:::{toctree} :hidden: var-naming -::: - -:::{toctree} -:hidden: - react :::docs/src/dev-guide/building.md (2)
14-15: Improve grammar in the dependencies note.The sentence could be clearer with proper article usage.
Apply this change:
-You may want to specify option `--include=dev` if you are running in an environment where +You may want to specify the option `--include=dev` if you are running in an environment where🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~14-~14: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...pm install ``` You may want to specify option--include=devif you are running in a...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
23-23: Format the URL consistently and consider security implications.Two suggestions:
- Format the URL as a proper Markdown link for consistency
- Consider using
127.0.0.1instead oflocalhostfor explicit local-only bindingApply this change:
-The application should now be served in debug mode at http://localhost:3010. +The application should now be served in debug mode at [http://127.0.0.1:3010](http://127.0.0.1:3010).🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
23-23: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
docs/src/dev-guide/index.md (1)
3-4: Consider enhancing icon accessibilityThe navigation instruction could be more accessible by including a visual description of the menu icon (three horizontal lines/hamburger menu) alongside the icon element.
-hidden, click the <i class="fa fa-bars"></i> icon) to navigate to specific docs. +hidden, click the menu <i class="fa fa-bars"></i> icon (three horizontal lines)) to navigate to specific docs.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”?
Context: ...eft sidebar (if it's hidden, click the icon) to naviga...(I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md (2)
5-18: Add a comma to improve readability.The process overview is well-structured and comprehensive. However, there's a minor grammatical improvement needed.
Apply this change:
- the change and your proposed implementation if any. A repo maintainer will give you + the change and your proposed implementation, if any. A repo maintainer will give you🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...tion for the change and your proposed implementation if any. A repo maintainer will give you...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
1-23: Well-structured contribution guidelines that align with project objectives.This document effectively establishes the contribution process as part of the documentation site infrastructure. It provides clear steps, maintains consistent formatting, and integrates well with the broader documentation structure.
Consider adding a section about documentation contributions since this PR sets up the docs site infrastructure. This could include guidelines for:
- Writing and organizing documentation
- Local documentation testing using
task docs:serve- Documentation deployment process
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...tion for the change and your proposed implementation if any. A repo maintainer will give you...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.md (2)
5-7: Consider adding environment setup requirements.The introduction should specify:
- The minimum Node.js version required for running Jest tests
- Any prerequisite setup steps (e.g.,
npm install) before running tests
42-42: Add more relevant references.Consider adding links to:
- Jest documentation for test configuration
- Project's keyboard shortcuts documentation
- Build process documentation
tools/scripts/find-broken-docs-links.py (3)
7-34: Add type hints and remove unused parameterThe main function could be improved with type hints, and the unused
argvparameter should be removed.Apply this diff:
-def main(argv): +def main() -> int:Also, consider extracting the error messages as constants at the module level for better maintainability.
43-87: Improve pattern matching robustnessThe current implementation has a few areas for improvement:
- The grep patterns could be more robust by anchoring them:
- r"docs\.yscope\.com/.+\.md", + r"docs\.yscope\.com/[^\"'\s]+\.md",
- Consider logging grep errors instead of silently passing:
except subprocess.CalledProcessError: - pass + if e.returncode != 1: # grep returns 1 when no matches found + print(f"Warning: grep failed for {path}: {e.stderr.decode()}", + file=sys.stderr)
104-105: Fix Yoda condition in the entry pointThe current condition uses a Yoda-style comparison which is less readable.
Apply this diff:
-if "__main__" == __name__: +if __name__ == "__main__": - sys.exit(main(sys.argv)) + sys.exit(main())🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
104-104: Yoda condition detected
Rewrite as
__name__ == "__main__"(SIM300)
docs/tasks.yml (3)
10-13: Add safety check before removalConsider adding a check to ensure G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR is not empty or root before removal to prevent accidental deletions.
clean: cmds: + - | + if [ -n "{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}" ] && [ "{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}" != "/" ]; then rm -rf '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}' + fi
14-20: Consider environment-specific server configurationsThe current setup disables caching (-c-1), which is suitable for development but might not be optimal for production. Consider adding environment-specific configurations.
serve: vars: + CACHE_FLAG: '{{if eq .ENVIRONMENT "production"}}-c1{{else}}-c-1{{end}}' deps: - "http-server" - "site" cmds: - - "npm --prefix '{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}' exec http-server '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}' -c-1" + - "npm --prefix '{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}' exec http-server '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}' {{.CACHE_FLAG}}"
21-61: Optimize build performance for large documentation setsThe current setup processes documentation sequentially. For large documentation sets, consider enabling parallel processing with Sphinx's -j flag.
sphinx-build \ --write-all \ --fresh-env \ --conf-dir conf \ --nitpicky \ --fail-on-warning \ --keep-going \ + -j auto \ --builder html \ src "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}"docs/src/index.md (3)
27-31: Consider adding a quick usage exampleThe introduction effectively describes the tool's capabilities. Consider enhancing it with a quick code example or command-line usage snippet to help users get started immediately.
58-60: Consider adding version compatibility informationIt would be helpful to specify the supported versions of monaco-editor and clp-ffi-js.
83-90: Consider linking to corresponding GitHub issuesTo improve transparency and allow users to track progress, consider linking each feature to its corresponding GitHub issue (if available).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (23)
.gitignore(1 hunks).gitmodules(1 hunks)README.md(2 hunks)Taskfile.yaml(1 hunks)docs/README.md(1 hunks)docs/conf/conf.py(1 hunks)docs/dev-guide/validation.md(0 hunks)docs/requirements.txt(1 hunks)docs/src/.gitattributes(1 hunks)docs/src/_static/custom.css(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/building.md(2 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/index.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/react.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/var-naming.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/index.md(1 hunks)docs/src/index.md(1 hunks)docs/src/user-guide/index.md(1 hunks)docs/tasks.yml(1 hunks)tools/scripts/find-broken-docs-links.py(1 hunks)tools/yscope-dev-utils(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/dev-guide/validation.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- .gitignore
- .gitmodules
- Taskfile.yaml
- docs/conf/conf.py
- docs/requirements.txt
- docs/src/.gitattributes
- docs/src/_static/custom.css
- docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/react.md
- docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/var-naming.md
- tools/yscope-dev-utils
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
README.md
78-78: Duplicate link or image reference definition: "bug-report"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
docs/README.md
42-42: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
docs/src/dev-guide/building.md
11-11: null
Dollar signs used before commands without showing output
(MD014, commands-show-output)
20-20: null
Dollar signs used before commands without showing output
(MD014, commands-show-output)
23-23: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
26-26: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-req"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
28-28: Unused link or image reference definition: "task"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/README.md
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...ignificant increases in the size of repo as we add and update images. * [Node.js...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...view the output](#viewing-the-output) * Python 3.10 or later * [Task] >= 3.38.0 * We...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_OF)
docs/src/dev-guide/building.md
[uncategorized] ~14-~14: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...pm install ``` You may want to specify option --include=dev if you are running in a...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md
[uncategorized] ~8-~8: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...tion for the change and your proposed implementation if any. A repo maintainer will give you...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
docs/src/dev-guide/index.md
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”?
Context: ...eft sidebar (if it's hidden, click the icon) to naviga...
(I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM)
[duplication] ~12-~12: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ... :gutter: 2 :::{grid-item-card} 🔗 building Building ^^^ Docs about building the application...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
docs/src/user-guide/index.md
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”?
Context: ...left sidebar (if it's hidden, click the icon) to naviga...
(I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM)
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
tools/scripts/find-broken-docs-links.py
104-104: Yoda condition detected
Rewrite as __name__ == "__main__"
(SIM300)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/index.md (2)
1-4: LGTM! Clear and well-structured introduction.
The title and introductory text effectively communicate the purpose of the coding guidelines.
6-9: Verify the existence of linked documentation files.
The links appear to be correctly formatted, but we should verify that the referenced files exist.
✅ Verification successful
Links to documentation files are correctly configured
Both referenced documentation files exist in the expected locations:
docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/var-naming.mddocs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/react.md
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced documentation files
echo "Checking for var-naming documentation..."
fd "var-naming.md" docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines
echo "Checking for react documentation..."
fd "react.md" docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines
Length of output: 375
docs/src/dev-guide/building.md (2)
1-6: LGTM! Clear and well-structured requirements section.
The heading hierarchy and link references are properly organized.
34-35: LGTM! Well-organized reference links.
The link references are properly formatted and maintained.
docs/src/dev-guide/index.md (2)
8-32: LGTM! Well-structured grid layout
The grid layout effectively organizes the main documentation sections with consistent card formatting and clear descriptions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~12-~12: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ... :gutter: 2 :::{grid-item-card} 🔗 building Building ^^^ Docs about building the application...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
34-49: Verify existence of all referenced documentation pages
Let's ensure all referenced documentation pages exist to prevent broken links.
✅ Verification successful
All referenced documentation pages exist and are properly linked
All documentation pages referenced in the toctree directives have been verified to exist in the correct locations:
- docs/src/dev-guide/building.md
- docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md
- docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/index.md
- docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.md
- docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all referenced documentation pages exist
echo "Checking for referenced documentation files..."
for page in "building.md" "contributing-getting-started.md" "coding-guidelines/index.md" "contributing-validation.md" "contributing-linting.md"; do
if fd -p "docs/src/dev-guide/$page" ; then
echo "✓ Found: $page"
else
echo "✗ Missing: $page"
fi
done
Length of output: 1685
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md (3)
1-4: LGTM! Clear and welcoming introduction.
The introduction effectively sets a welcoming tone and clearly states the purpose of the document.
11-15: Verify the relative documentation links.
Let's ensure the referenced documentation sections exist and are properly linked.
✅ Verification successful
All documentation links are valid and properly referenced
The verification confirms that all referenced documentation files exist in their expected locations:
docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines/index.mddocs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.mddocs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced documentation files
# Check for coding guidelines
echo "Checking coding guidelines..."
fd "index.md" docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines
# Check for validation and linting docs
echo "Checking validation and linting docs..."
fd "contributing-validation.md|contributing-linting.md" docs/src/dev-guide
Length of output: 420
19-23: Verify GitHub issue templates and fork URL.
Let's ensure the GitHub issue templates and fork URL are correctly configured.
✅ Verification successful
GitHub issue templates and fork URL are properly configured
The verification confirms:
- Both bug report and feature request templates exist and are properly configured
- The repository exists, is active (not archived), and accessible
- All URLs in the documentation correctly reference the repository
- Issue templates contain appropriate labels and required fields
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GitHub issue templates and fork URL
# Check for issue templates
echo "Checking issue templates..."
fd "bug-report.yml|feature-request.yml" .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE
# Verify repository name in URLs
echo "Verifying repository name consistency..."
rg "y-scope/yscope-log-viewer" .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/*.yml
Length of output: 604
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the content of the issue templates to ensure they're properly configured
echo "Checking bug report template content:"
cat .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.yml
echo -e "\nChecking feature request template content:"
cat .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature-request.yml
echo -e "\nChecking if the repository exists and is accessible:"
gh repo view y-scope/yscope-log-viewer --json name,isArchived,defaultBranchRef
Length of output: 2257
docs/tasks.yml (2)
3-8: Consider adding G_BUILD_DIR validation
The tasks rely on G_BUILD_DIR being properly set, but there's no explicit validation. Consider adding a validation step to ensure this critical variable is set and points to a valid directory.
62-90: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Specify Python version requirement
The virtual environment creation doesn't specify a Python version, which could lead to inconsistencies across different environments. Consider adding version validation.
docs-venv:
internal: true
vars:
CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5"
OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_DOCS_VENV_DIR}}"
REQUIREMENTS_FILE: "docs/requirements.txt"
+ MIN_PYTHON_VERSION: "3.8"
cmds:
+ - |
+ python_version=$(python3 -c 'import sys; print(f"{sys.version_info.major}.{sys.version_info.minor}")')
+ if ! printf '%s\n%s\n' "$python_version" "{{.MIN_PYTHON_VERSION}}" | sort -C -V; then
+ echo "Error: Python {{.MIN_PYTHON_VERSION}}+ required, found $python_version"
+ exit 1
+ fi
- task: ":utils:create-venv"README.md (1)
52-53: LGTM! Clear and consistent feedback instructions.
The text effectively guides users on how to provide feedback through GitHub issues.
docs/src/index.md (3)
70-80: LGTM! Clear community engagement channels
The feedback and contribution sections effectively guide users to appropriate channels for engagement.
5-21: Verify grid directive rendering
The grid layout looks good, but please verify that the MyST Markdown grid directive renders correctly in your documentation build pipeline.
✅ Verification successful
Grid directive will render correctly
The configuration is properly set up with sphinx-design extension enabled in docs/conf/conf.py, which provides the grid functionality used in the documentation. The MyST parser is also correctly configured with necessary extensions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the required MyST extensions are properly configured
# Check if myst-parser is installed with the required extensions
grep -r "myst_enable_extensions" docs/
Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual configuration of MyST extensions in the conf.py file
cat docs/conf/conf.py
Length of output: 2604
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also check if there are any grid-related extensions or configurations
grep -r "grid" docs/conf/
Length of output: 25
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if sphinx-design is installed (which provides grid functionality)
grep -r "sphinx-design" docs/
Length of output: 29
23-26: Verify badge links and shields
Ensure all badge URLs are accessible and displaying correct information.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the links to the badges by checking the actual markdown file to ensure the badge definitions are properly set up.
Let me check for the remaining shield definitions to ensure all are properly defined.
All badge URLs are properly configured and accessible
All three badges (bugs, feature requests, and Zulip) are correctly defined in the markdown file and their corresponding shield.io URLs return HTTP 200 status codes, indicating they are working as expected. The badge definitions match their references in the document.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify shield.io badges and their corresponding links
# Check if the shield URLs are accessible
curl -I "https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/bug?label=bugs"
curl -I "https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/enhancement?label=feature-requests"
curl -I "https://img.shields.io/badge/zulip-yscope--clp%20chat-1888FA?logo=zulip"
Length of output: 4285
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the markdown file for badge definitions
cat docs/src/index.md | grep -A 5 "\[bugs-shield\]"
Length of output: 770
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for feature-requests-shield and zulip-shield definitions
cat docs/src/index.md | grep -A 1 "\[feature-requests-shield\]:\|\[zulip-shield\]:"
Length of output: 362
| * Verify that the following features work: | ||
| * Changing display themes | ||
| * Changing the number of events per page | ||
| * Navigating to the first/last/next/previous page | ||
| * Loading a log file using the open file dialog and dragging & dropping | ||
| * Copying a link to a log event | ||
| * Changing the log level filter | ||
| * Exporting all logs to a file | ||
| * Toggling tabbed panels in the sidebar | ||
| * Using keyboard shortcuts | ||
| * Perform a build and verify that all features are functional |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance manual testing guidelines with specific scenarios.
Consider improving this section by adding:
- Test scenarios with expected outcomes for each feature
- A table of keyboard shortcuts and their expected behaviours
- Steps to verify the build process mentioned in line 40
| * Find tests under `<projectRoot>/test`. | ||
| * Enforce line and function coverage thresholds at directory levels. | ||
| * Output detailed results, including any coverage issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Documentation needs update to reflect actual test setup
The documentation appears to be inaccurate or outdated:
- The referenced
<projectRoot>/testdirectory doesn't exist (only an emptypublic/testwas found) - No test configuration or coverage thresholds were found in the codebase
- No Jest configuration files are present
Please either:
- Remove the test directory references and coverage threshold mentions if they're not implemented
- Or update the documentation to reflect the actual test setup being used
🔗 Analysis chain
Add specific details about test configuration and output.
Please enhance this section by adding:
- The specific coverage thresholds being enforced
- The location where test results and coverage reports can be found
Let's verify the test directory structure:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test directory and configuration
# Check if test directory exists and look for Jest configuration
fd -t d "test$" && \
echo "Test directory found" && \
rg -A 5 "coverageThreshold|collectCoverage" package.json
Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the test configuration in different potential locations
echo "=== Checking Jest config files ==="
fd -e json -e js "jest.config"
echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json for test scripts ==="
rg "test" package.json
echo -e "\n=== Checking test directory content ==="
ls -R public/test/
echo -e "\n=== Checking documentation for test coverage info ==="
rg -i "coverage|threshold" docs/
Length of output: 893
| Push your changes to a branch and let the [GitHub Action Workflow][gh-worflow-test] execute the | ||
| tests automatically. This workflow: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update workflow reference in documentation
The documentation incorrectly states that GitHub Actions will automatically execute tests. However, based on the workflow configurations and package.json scripts, there is no test workflow or test scripts defined. The only automated checks are linting (lint.yaml) and PR title validation (pr-title-checks.yaml).
- Update line 19-20 in
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.mdto reference linting instead of testing - Consider adding automated tests to the CI pipeline if they are needed
🔗 Analysis chain
Fix inconsistency in workflow reference.
The link references a lint workflow (lint.yaml), but the section discusses test execution. This might confuse contributors.
Let's verify the workflow configuration:
Also applies to: 42-42
Let me gather more information about the workflows to better understand the testing setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check workflow configuration
# Look for test and lint configurations in workflows
rg -t yaml "jest|test|lint" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check all workflow files content
cat .github/workflows/*.yaml
# Also check if there's any test-related scripts in package.json
cat package.json | jq '.scripts'
Length of output: 3258
| def _parse_and_print_match(match: str, error_msg: str): | ||
| """ | ||
| Parses and prints grep matches in a format relevant to the current environment. | ||
| :param match: The match to parse and print. | ||
| :param error_msg: Error message if the pattern is found. | ||
| """ | ||
| if os.getenv("GITHUB_ACTIONS") == "true": | ||
| # Print a GitHub Actions error annotation | ||
| file, line, _ = match.split(":", 2) | ||
| print(f"::error file={file},line={line}::{error_msg}") | ||
| else: | ||
| print(error_msg, file=sys.stderr) | ||
| print(match, file=sys.stderr) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for match parsing
The match parsing could be more robust with proper error handling.
Apply this diff:
def _parse_and_print_match(match: str, error_msg: str):
if os.getenv("GITHUB_ACTIONS") == "true":
# Print a GitHub Actions error annotation
- file, line, _ = match.split(":", 2)
- print(f"::error file={file},line={line}::{error_msg}")
+ try:
+ file, line, _ = match.split(":", 2)
+ print(f"::error file={file},line={line}::{error_msg}")
+ except ValueError:
+ print(f"::error::Invalid match format: {match}")
else:
print(error_msg, file=sys.stderr)
print(match, file=sys.stderr)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def _parse_and_print_match(match: str, error_msg: str): | |
| """ | |
| Parses and prints grep matches in a format relevant to the current environment. | |
| :param match: The match to parse and print. | |
| :param error_msg: Error message if the pattern is found. | |
| """ | |
| if os.getenv("GITHUB_ACTIONS") == "true": | |
| # Print a GitHub Actions error annotation | |
| file, line, _ = match.split(":", 2) | |
| print(f"::error file={file},line={line}::{error_msg}") | |
| else: | |
| print(error_msg, file=sys.stderr) | |
| print(match, file=sys.stderr) | |
| def _parse_and_print_match(match: str, error_msg: str): | |
| """ | |
| Parses and prints grep matches in a format relevant to the current environment. | |
| :param match: The match to parse and print. | |
| :param error_msg: Error message if the pattern is found. | |
| """ | |
| if os.getenv("GITHUB_ACTIONS") == "true": | |
| # Print a GitHub Actions error annotation | |
| try: | |
| file, line, _ = match.split(":", 2) | |
| print(f"::error file={file},line={line}::{error_msg}") | |
| except ValueError: | |
| print(f"::error::Invalid match format: {match}") | |
| else: | |
| print(error_msg, file=sys.stderr) | |
| print(match, file=sys.stderr) |
| def _get_repo_root() -> Path: | ||
| path_str = subprocess.check_output( | ||
| ["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"], cwd=Path(__file__).parent, text=True | ||
| ) | ||
| return Path(path_str.strip()) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for git command failure
The function should handle the case when it's not in a git repository or when the command fails.
Apply this diff:
def _get_repo_root() -> Path:
- path_str = subprocess.check_output(
- ["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"], cwd=Path(__file__).parent, text=True
- )
- return Path(path_str.strip())
+ try:
+ path_str = subprocess.check_output(
+ ["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"],
+ cwd=Path(__file__).parent,
+ text=True,
+ stderr=subprocess.PIPE
+ )
+ return Path(path_str.strip())
+ except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
+ print(f"Error: Not a git repository or git command failed: {e.stderr.decode()}",
+ file=sys.stderr)
+ sys.exit(1)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def _get_repo_root() -> Path: | |
| path_str = subprocess.check_output( | |
| ["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"], cwd=Path(__file__).parent, text=True | |
| ) | |
| return Path(path_str.strip()) | |
| def _get_repo_root() -> Path: | |
| try: | |
| path_str = subprocess.check_output( | |
| ["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"], | |
| cwd=Path(__file__).parent, | |
| text=True, | |
| stderr=subprocess.PIPE | |
| ) | |
| return Path(path_str.strip()) | |
| except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e: | |
| print(f"Error: Not a git repository or git command failed: {e.stderr.decode()}", | |
| file=sys.stderr) | |
| sys.exit(1) |
docs/tasks.yml
Outdated
| http-server: | ||
| internal: true | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | ||
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}" | ||
| deps: | ||
| - ":init" | ||
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| cmds: | ||
| - "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'" | ||
| - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server" | ||
| # This command must be last | ||
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| sources: | ||
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/Taskfile.yaml" | ||
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | ||
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Pin http-server version for consistency
The http-server package installation doesn't specify a version, which could lead to inconsistent behaviour across environments. Consider pinning the version.
cmds:
- "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'"
- - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server"
+ - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install [email protected]"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| http-server: | |
| internal: true | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | |
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}" | |
| deps: | |
| - ":init" | |
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| cmds: | |
| - "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'" | |
| - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server" | |
| # This command must be last | |
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| sources: | |
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/Taskfile.yaml" | |
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | |
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] | |
| http-server: | |
| internal: true | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | |
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}" | |
| deps: | |
| - ":init" | |
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| cmds: | |
| - "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'" | |
| - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server@14.1.1" | |
| # This command must be last | |
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| sources: | |
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/Taskfile.yaml" | |
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | |
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] |
| @@ -69,18 +69,19 @@ See the docs in our [developer guide](docs/dev-guide). | |||
| * Automatic conversion of text log files to IR stream format in the browser. | |||
| * Deployment of components via NPM. | |||
|
|
|||
| [bug-report]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate link reference definition.
The [bug-report] link reference is defined twice (lines 72 and 78). This duplication should be removed to maintain a single source of truth.
Apply this diff to remove the duplicate:
[bug-report]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml
[bugs-shield]: https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/bug?label=bugs
[clp-ffi-js]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp-ffi-js
[clp-loglib-py]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp-loglib-py
[clp-repo]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp
[datasets]: https://docs.yscope.com/clp/main/user-guide/resources-datasets
-[bug-report]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml
[feature-req]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=enhancement&template=feature-request.ymlAlso applies to: 78-78
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kirkrodrigues, glad I could help!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai come up with an appliable suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@junhaoliao, certainly! To fix the issue, you can remove the duplicate [bug-report] link reference definition in README.md. Here is the corrected section without the duplicate:
[bug-report]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml
[bugs-shield]: https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/bug?label=bugs
[clp-ffi-js]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp-ffi-js
[clp-loglib-py]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp-loglib-py
[clp-repo]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp
[datasets]: https://docs.yscope.com/clp/main/user-guide/resources-datasets
[feature-req]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=enhancement&template=feature-request.yml
[feature-requests-shield]: https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/enhancement?label=feature-requests
[hive-24hrs]: https://zenodo.org/record/7094921#.Y5JbH33MKHs
[log4j1-appenders]: https://github.com/y-scope/log4j1-appenders
[logback-appenders]: https://github.com/y-scope/logback-appenders
[monaco-editor]: https://microsoft.github.io/monaco-editor/
[online-demo]: https://y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/?filePath=https://yscope.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/sample-logs/yarn-ubuntu-resourcemanager-ip-172-31-17-135.log.1.clp.zst
[zulip]: https://yscope-clp.zulipchat.com/
[zulip-shield]: https://img.shields.io/badge/zulip-yscope--clp%20chat-1888FA?logo=zulipThis ensures that the [bug-report] link reference is only defined once in the file.
docs/src/index.md
Outdated
| * A demo of the log viewer can be found [here][online-demo]. | ||
| * The demo loads a Hadoop YARN log file from the [hive-24hrs] log dataset. | ||
| * More info on the dataset and other datasets can be found [here][datasets]. | ||
| * To open an IR stream, drag and drop it onto the log viewer or use the open | ||
| file dialog. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
External links are accessible but require URL update
The demo and dataset links are accessible, but the Zenodo dataset URL needs to be updated:
- The dataset URL redirects from
/record/7094921to/records/7094921 - The demo URL at
y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/is working correctly
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify external dataset links
Please ensure the Hadoop YARN dataset link and demo URL are accessible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify external links are accessible
# Check if the demo and dataset URLs are accessible
curl -I "https://y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/"
curl -I "https://zenodo.org/record/7094921"
Length of output: 2597
docs/src/index.md
Outdated
| [bug-report]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml | ||
| [bugs-shield]: https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/bug?label=bugs | ||
| [clp-ffi-js]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp-ffi-js | ||
| [clp-loglib-py]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp-loglib-py | ||
| [clp-repo]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp | ||
| [datasets]: https://docs.yscope.com/clp/main/user-guide/resources-datasets | ||
| [feature-req]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=enhancement&template=feature-request.yml | ||
| [feature-requests-shield]: https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/enhancement?label=feature-requests | ||
| [hive-24hrs]: https://zenodo.org/record/7094921#.Y5JbH33MKHs | ||
| [log4j1-appenders]: https://github.com/y-scope/log4j1-appenders | ||
| [logback-appenders]: https://github.com/y-scope/logback-appenders | ||
| [monaco-editor]: https://microsoft.github.io/monaco-editor/ | ||
| [online-demo]: https://y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/?filePath=https://yscope.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/sample-logs/yarn-ubuntu-resourcemanager-ip-172-31-17-135.log.1.clp.zst | ||
| [zulip]: https://yscope-clp.zulipchat.com/ | ||
| [zulip-shield]: https://img.shields.io/badge/zulip-yscope--clp%20chat-1888FA?logo=zulip |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Reference links require attention
Several issues were found with the reference links in the documentation:
- All reference links are defined but not used in the document:
bug-report,bugs-shield,clp-ffi-js,clp-loglib-py,clp-repo,datasets,feature-req,feature-requests-shield,hive-24hrs,log4j1-appenders,logback-appenders,monaco-editor,online-demo,zulip, andzulip-shield - Several URLs are not found in the repository:
- Bug report template:
https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml - Bug shield:
https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/bug?label=bugs - Feature request template:
https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=enhancement&template=feature-request.yml - Feature requests shield:
https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/enhancement?label=feature-requests - Online demo:
https://y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/?filePath=https://yscope.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/sample-logs/yarn-ubuntu-resourcemanager-ip-172-31-17-135.log.1.clp.zst - Zulip chat badge:
https://img.shields.io/badge/zulip-yscope--clp%20chat-1888FA?logo=zulip
- Bug report template:
Please either remove the unused references or add the corresponding link references in the document content.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify all reference links
Please ensure all reference links are accessible and point to the correct resources.
Let me analyze the links from the code snippet in the review comment and verify their accessibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all reference links are accessible
# Extract and check all URLs
rg -o 'https?://[^\s\]]+'
Length of output: 105330
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced URLs in the file are valid by checking if they exist in the repository
for link in \
"https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml" \
"https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/bug?label=bugs" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/clp-ffi-js" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/clp-loglib-py" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/clp" \
"https://docs.yscope.com/clp/main/user-guide/resources-datasets" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=enhancement&template=feature-request.yml" \
"https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/enhancement?label=feature-requests" \
"https://zenodo.org/record/7094921#.Y5JbH33MKHs" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/log4j1-appenders" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/logback-appenders" \
"https://microsoft.github.io/monaco-editor/" \
"https://y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/?filePath=https://yscope.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/sample-logs/yarn-ubuntu-resourcemanager-ip-172-31-17-135.log.1.clp.zst" \
"https://yscope-clp.zulipchat.com/" \
"https://img.shields.io/badge/zulip-yscope--clp%20chat-1888FA?logo=zulip"; do
if ! rg -q "$link" .; then
echo "Link not found in repository: $link"
fi
done
# Check if all reference definitions are used
for ref in \
"bug-report" \
"bugs-shield" \
"clp-ffi-js" \
"clp-loglib-py" \
"clp-repo" \
"datasets" \
"feature-req" \
"feature-requests-shield" \
"hive-24hrs" \
"log4j1-appenders" \
"logback-appenders" \
"monaco-editor" \
"online-demo" \
"zulip" \
"zulip-shield"; do
if ! rg -q "\[$ref\]:" docs/src/index.md; then
echo "Reference definition not found: $ref"
fi
if ! rg -q "\[$ref\](?!\:)" docs/src/index.md; then
echo "Reference not used: $ref"
fi
done
Length of output: 28129
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
docs/src/user-guide/index.md (2)
3-4: Consider enhancing navigation instructions for better accessibilityWhile the current instructions are functional, consider these improvements:
- Add a text description of the icon (e.g., "menu bars icon") for screen readers
- Include the location of the icon (e.g., "in the top-left corner")
Here's a suggested improvement:
-This guide documents how to use and operate the YScope Log Viewer. Use the left sidebar (if it's -hidden, click the <i class="fa fa-bars"></i> icon) to navigate to specific docs. +This guide documents how to use and operate the YScope Log Viewer. Use the left sidebar to navigate to specific docs. If the sidebar is hidden, click the menu bars icon (<i class="fa fa-bars" aria-label="menu bars"></i>) in the top-left corner of the page.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”?
Context: ...left sidebar (if it's hidden, click the icon) to naviga...(I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM)
5-6: Enhance the placeholder message with more contextConsider providing more information about:
- Expected timeline for additional content
- Alternative resources users can reference in the meantime
- How users can contribute or suggest documentation topics
Here's a suggested improvement:
-More details will be added soon. +More detailed documentation is coming soon! In the meantime: +- Check our [GitHub repository](https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer) for updates +- Join our community discussions for help +- Submit documentation suggestions through GitHub issuesdocs/src/dev-guide/index.md (2)
3-4: Consider using MyST-specific syntax for the iconWhile the HTML
<i>tag works, consider using MyST-specific syntax for better maintainability and consistency with the rest of the documentation.-hidden, click the <i class="fa fa-bars"></i> icon) to navigate +hidden, click the {fas}`bars` icon) to navigate🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”?
Context: ...eft sidebar (if it's hidden, click the icon) to naviga...(I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM)
8-24: Consider adding a Coding Guidelines cardSince coding guidelines are included in the toctree (line 37), consider adding a third card to maintain consistency and improve navigation.
:::::{grid} 1 1 2 2 :gutter: 2 :::{grid-item-card} :link: building Building ^^^ Docs about building the viewer. ::: :::{grid-item-card} :link: contributing-getting-started Contributing ^^^ Docs about contributing to this project. ::: + +:::{grid-item-card} +:link: coding-guidelines +Coding Guidelines +^^^ +Guidelines for maintaining consistent code quality. +::: ::::🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~12-~12: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ... :gutter: 2 :::{grid-item-card} 🔗 building Building ^^^ Docs about building the viewer. :::...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (3)
3-5: Consider clarifying when to suppress warningsThe guidance about either fixing violations or suppressing warnings could benefit from more specificity about when each approach is appropriate. Consider adding criteria for when suppression is acceptable versus when fixes are required.
-Before submitting a pull request, ensure you've run our linting tools and either fixed any -violations or suppressed the warning. If you can't run the linting workflows locally, you can enable +Before submitting a pull request, ensure you've run our linting tools and address any violations. +Only suppress warnings when they are false positives or when fixing would require extensive refactoring +that's out of scope for your PR. If you can't run the linting workflows locally, you can enable
9-10: Fix the "Building" reference linkThe reference to the "Building" section should be a proper markdown link to ensure users can navigate directly to it.
-To run the linting tools, you'll need to install the dependencies as specified in -[Building](building). +To run the linting tools, you'll need to install the dependencies as specified in +[Building](../getting-started/building.md).
20-20: Improve wording for clarity and professionalismThe current wording with "AND" in capitals appears informal.
-To run all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: +To run all linting checks and automatically apply available fixes:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~20-~20: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell npm run l...(FIX_RESOLVE)
docs/src/dev-guide/building.md (4)
1-7: Consider adding version requirements and OS compatibility informationThe requirements section would be more helpful with:
- Minimum supported Node.js version
- Operating system compatibility information
# Building ## Requirements -Node.js via [prebuilt installers][nodejs-prebuilt-installer] / [nvm][nvm] / -[nvm-windows][nvm-windows]. +Node.js (version 16.x or higher) via: +- [prebuilt installers][nodejs-prebuilt-installer] +- [nvm][nvm] (for Linux/macOS) +- [nvm-windows][nvm-windows] (for Windows) + +Supported Operating Systems: +- Linux +- macOS +- Windows
16-17: Clarify the NODE_ENV production environment contextThe explanation about the
--include=devflag could be more explicit about when and why this is needed.-You may want to specify `--include=dev` if you are running in an environment where the environment -variable `NODE_ENV=production` is set. +If you're in a production environment (where `NODE_ENV=production` is set), you'll need to include dev +dependencies for building the project: + +```shell +npm install --include=dev +```
21-27: Add more details about the development processConsider adding:
- Expected console output during successful startup
- Common issues and their solutions
- How to stop the development server
You can build and serve the viewer in debug mode using: ```shell npm start-The viewer should then be available at http://localhost:3010.
+The viewer should then be available at http://localhost:3010. You should see
+output similar to:
++> webpack serve +<webpack compilation output> +webpack compiled successfully +
+
+To stop the development server, pressCtrl+C.
+
+### Troubleshooting
+
+If you see "address already in use" error, ensure no other service is using port 3010.--- `31-37`: **Add details about the build output and verification** Consider adding information about: - Expected contents of the dist directory - How to verify a successful build - Build artifacts size expectations ```diff To create a build, run: ```shell npm run build-The build should then be available in the
distdirectory.
+The build will be created in thedistdirectory. A successful build should contain:
+-index.html: The main viewer page
+-assets/: Directory containing bundled JavaScript and CSS files
+-images/: Directory containing optimized images
+
+To verify the build:
+1. Check that all expected files are present in thedistdirectory
+2. Ensure no error messages in the build output
+3. The total build size should be approximately X MB</blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2d0abb2d42c37f954708e2b5d0c1e273f08e9eb and 5b49f52f66fa6b8825c27b532cd20bc7340475fc. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (7)</summary> * `docs/src/dev-guide/building.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/src/dev-guide/index.md` (1 hunks) * `docs/src/user-guide/index.md` (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)</summary> * docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md * docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.md </details> <details> <summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary> <details> <summary>docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines.md</summary> [style] ~22-~22: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. Context: ...-based indexing variable. * `numEvents` for the total number of events. # React #... (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE) </details> <details> <summary>docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md</summary> [style] ~20-~20: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording. Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell npm run l... (FIX_RESOLVE) </details> <details> <summary>docs/src/dev-guide/index.md</summary> [uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”? Context: ...eft sidebar (if it's hidden, click the <i class="fa fa-bars"></i> icon) to naviga... (I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM) --- [duplication] ~12-~12: Possible typo: you repeated a word Context: ... :gutter: 2 :::{grid-item-card} :link: building Building ^^^ Docs about building the viewer. :::... (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE) </details> <details> <summary>docs/src/user-guide/index.md</summary> [uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”? Context: ...left sidebar (if it's hidden, click the <i class="fa fa-bars"></i> icon) to naviga... (I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM) </details> </details> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)</summary> <details> <summary>docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md</summary> 26-26: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-req" Link and image reference definitions should be needed (MD053, link-image-reference-definitions) --- 28-28: Unused link or image reference definition: "task" Link and image reference definitions should be needed (MD053, link-image-reference-definitions) </details> </details> </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (4)</summary> <details> <summary>docs/src/user-guide/index.md (1)</summary> `1-2`: **LGTM! Clear and well-structured heading.** The title effectively identifies this as the user guide section. </details> <details> <summary>docs/src/dev-guide/index.md (2)</summary> `6-7`: **LGTM!** Clear and concise introduction to the sections. --- `26-40`: **Verify the existence of all referenced documentation files** Let's ensure all referenced documentation files exist in the repository. <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> The previous script's output wasn't conclusive as it only showed the command execution but not the actual results. Let's use `fd` to list all markdown files in the dev-guide directory to verify the existence of these documentation files. --- **All referenced documentation files are present** All documentation files referenced in the toctree sections exist in the repository: - building.md - contributing-getting-started.md - coding-guidelines.md - contributing-validation.md - contributing-linting.md </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all referenced documentation files exist # List of files to check files=( "docs/src/dev-guide/building.md" "docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md" "docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines.md" "docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.md" "docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md" ) # Check each file for file in "${files[@]}"; do if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then echo "Missing file: $file" fi doneLength of output: 666
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's use fd to find the actual files in the docs directory fd -e md . docs/src/dev-guide/Length of output: 271
docs/src/dev-guide/building.md (1)
39-41: LGTM! Reference links are well-organized
The reference links are properly formatted and match their usage in the document.
| [feature-req]: https://github.com/y-scope/clp/issues/new?assignees=&labels=enhancement&projects=&template=feature-request.yml | ||
| [gh-workflow-lint]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/blob/main/.github/workflows/lint.yaml | ||
| [Task]: https://taskfile.dev/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove or utilize unused link references
The following link references are defined but not used in the document:
[feature-req][Task]
Either remove these unused references or add relevant content that uses them.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
26-26: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-req"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
28-28: Unused link or image reference definition: "task"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (3)
1-5: Consider enhancing the introduction with specific linting typesThe introduction could be more helpful by briefly mentioning the types of linting performed (e.g., ESLint for JavaScript, Prettier for formatting, etc.). This would give contributors immediate context about what to expect.
7-10: Specify linting-specific dependenciesConsider listing the specific dependencies required for linting, separate from the general building requirements. This would help contributors who only want to run linters without setting up the full development environment.
20-20: Improve text formattingConsider rewording to avoid using all caps "AND". A more professional alternative would be:
-To run all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: +To run all linting checks and automatically fix any fixable issues:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~20-~20: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell npm run l...(FIX_RESOLVE)
docs/src/dev-guide/index.md (2)
1-7: Consider enhancing the introduction for new developersThe introduction is clear but could be more welcoming. Consider adding a brief welcome message and the purpose of this developer guide before jumping into navigation instructions.
# Developer guide +Welcome to the YScope Log Viewer developer guide! This documentation will help you understand, build, and contribute to our project. + This guide contains docs useful for developing the YScope Log Viewer. Use the left sidebar (if it's hidden, click the <i class="fa fa-bars"></i> icon) to navigate to specific docs.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”?
Context: ...eft sidebar (if it's hidden, click the icon) to naviga...(I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM)
8-31: Enhance section descriptions for better clarityThe current descriptions are quite brief. Consider expanding them to better guide developers on what they'll find in each section.
Building ^^^ -Docs about building the viewer. +Learn how to set up your development environment, build the project from source, and run it locally for development. ::: :::{grid-item-card} :link: contributing-getting-started Contributing ^^^ -Docs about contributing to the viewer. +Find guidelines for submitting pull requests, reporting issues, and following our coding standards to contribute effectively. ::: :::{grid-item-card} :link: design-overview Design ^^^ -Docs about the viewer's design. +Understand the architecture, component structure, and design decisions behind the YScope Log Viewer.docs/src/index.md (2)
77-77: Remove unused shield referencesThe following badge URLs are defined but not used in the document:
bugs-shieldfeature-requests-shieldzulip-shieldConsider removing these unused references to maintain clean documentation.
Also applies to: 82-82, 88-88
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
77-77: Unused link or image reference definition: "bugs-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
50-50: Consider adding a tracking link for the Golang librarySince the Golang logging library is in development, it would be helpful to add a link to the relevant GitHub issue or project tracking its progress.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the Golang library development?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
docs/src/dev-guide/building-getting-started.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/design-overview.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/index.md(1 hunks)docs/src/index.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/src/dev-guide/building-getting-started.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
[style] ~20-~20: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell npm run l...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
docs/src/dev-guide/design-overview.md
[uncategorized] ~6-~6: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...o assist with computationally intensive tasks such as: * Deserializing the file and ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
docs/src/dev-guide/index.md
[uncategorized] ~4-~4: Did you mean “I”?
Context: ...eft sidebar (if it's hidden, click the icon) to naviga...
(I_LOWERCASE_PREMIUM)
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
26-26: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-req"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
28-28: Unused link or image reference definition: "task"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
docs/src/index.md
77-77: Unused link or image reference definition: "bugs-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
82-82: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-requests-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
88-88: Unused link or image reference definition: "zulip-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (2)
26-28: Previous comment about unused link references is still valid
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
26-26: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-req"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
28-28: Unused link or image reference definition: "task"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
27-27: Verify the lint workflow configuration
Let's ensure the referenced lint workflow exists and is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
Link to lint workflow is valid and correctly configured
The referenced GitHub workflow for linting exists at the specified path and is properly configured with:
- Appropriate triggers (PR, push, scheduled runs)
- Correct permissions and concurrency settings
- Essential steps for Node.js setup and lint execution
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the lint workflow configuration
# Check if the lint workflow file exists and contains necessary job configurations
if [ -f ".github/workflows/lint.yaml" ]; then
echo "Checking lint workflow configuration..."
grep -A 10 "jobs:" .github/workflows/lint.yaml
else
echo "Lint workflow file not found at expected location"
fi
Length of output: 432
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the complete workflow file content to ensure it's properly configured
cat .github/workflows/lint.yaml
Length of output: 774
docs/src/dev-guide/index.md (1)
33-55: Verify the existence of all referenced documentation files
Let's ensure all referenced documentation files exist in the repository.
✅ Verification successful
All documentation files referenced in toctree are present
All the documentation files referenced in the toctree directives exist in the correct location under docs/src/dev-guide/. The structure is valid and complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if all referenced documentation files exist
# List of files to check
files=(
"docs/src/dev-guide/building-getting-started.md"
"docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-getting-started.md"
"docs/src/dev-guide/coding-guidelines.md"
"docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-validation.md"
"docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md"
"docs/src/dev-guide/design-overview.md"
)
# Check each file
for file in "${files[@]}"; do
if [ ! -f "$file" ]; then
echo "Missing file: $file"
fi
done
Length of output: 821
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using fd to find these files
fd -e md "building-getting-started|contributing-getting-started|coding-guidelines|contributing-validation|contributing-linting|design-overview" docs/src/dev-guide/
Length of output: 430
docs/src/index.md (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clear and concise introduction
The introduction effectively communicates the tool's core capabilities and supported file formats.
| * The demo loads a Hadoop YARN log file from the [hive-24hrs] log dataset. | ||
| * More info on the dataset and other datasets can be found [here][datasets]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the Zenodo dataset URL
The Zenodo dataset URL should use "records" instead of "record" in the path.
Apply this change:
-[hive-24hrs]: https://zenodo.org/record/7094921#.Y5JbH33MKHs
+[hive-24hrs]: https://zenodo.org/records/7094921#.Y5JbH33MKHsAlso applies to: 83-83
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kirkrodrigues What the rabbit suggested here is trivial but valid: GET requests to https://zenodo.org/record/7094921 receives
HTTP/1.1 301 MOVED PERMANENTLY
...
location: /records/7094921
Shall we apply and update also the README.md?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| @@ -69,18 +69,19 @@ See the docs in our [developer guide](docs/dev-guide). | |||
| * Automatic conversion of text log files to IR stream format in the browser. | |||
| * Deployment of components via NPM. | |||
|
|
|||
| [bug-report]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- There are some broken links in this file now that should probably point to links in the published docs site.
- Now that we have the docs site, I think we can drop the "Generating IR Stream Logs", "How does it work?", and "Features in Development" sections since they'll be in the docs site and a more concise README should be better for the user.
Taskfile.yaml
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's use a lowercase t for consistency with our other filenames.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (2)
3-5: Consider clarifying the linting requirementsThe introduction could be more specific about:
- When exactly linting should be run (e.g., before creating the PR)
- How to properly suppress warnings when necessary
Consider this revision:
-Before submitting a pull request, ensure you've run our linting tools and either fixed any -violations or suppressed the warning. If you can't run the linting workflows locally, you can enable -and run the [lint][gh-workflow-lint] GitHub workflow in your fork. +Before creating a pull request, run our linting tools to check for any violations. All violations +should either be fixed or explicitly suppressed with appropriate comments explaining why. If you +can't run the linting workflows locally, you can enable and run the [lint][gh-workflow-lint] +GitHub workflow in your fork.
20-21: Improve documentation styleThe use of "AND" in all caps is informal. Consider using more professional documentation style.
-To run all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: +To run all linting checks and automatically fix any fixable issues:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~20-~20: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell npm run l...(FIX_RESOLVE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md(1 hunks)docs/src/dev-guide/index.md(1 hunks)docs/src/user-guide/index.md(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- docs/src/dev-guide/index.md
- docs/src/user-guide/index.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md
[style] ~20-~20: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...un all linting checks AND automatically fix any fixable issues: ```shell npm run l...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/src/dev-guide/contributing-linting.md (2)
26-26: LGTM! Link reference is properly defined and used
The link reference for the GitHub workflow is correctly defined and referenced in the document.
9-10: Verify the relative link to the Building section
Please ensure that the relative link building-getting-started will resolve correctly in the built documentation.
✅ Verification successful
The relative link is correctly structured
The link building-getting-started is valid as:
- Both files are in the same directory (
docs/src/dev-guide/) - The target file exists as
building-getting-started.md - The link is properly referenced in the documentation structure as shown in
index.md - Other documentation files use the same linking convention
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the referenced building-getting-started document exists
fd --type f "building.*getting-started.*" docs/src
# Check for any references to this section in other docs
rg "building-getting-started" docs/
Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the files are in the same directory
fd --type f --full-path "docs/src/dev-guide" --extension md
# Check the content of the index.md to understand the structure
cat docs/src/dev-guide/index.md
Length of output: 1224
Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <[email protected]>
…ked versions - Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kirkrodrigues <[email protected]>
…res in Development" sections in README.md.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
docs/README.md (3)
13-13: Add missing article "the"Add "the" before "repo" for grammatical correctness.
- the size of repo as we add and update images. + the size of the repo as we add and update images.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...ignificant increases in the size of repo as we add and update images. * [Node.js...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
15-15: Enhance Python version requirement clarityConsider adding "Python version" for better clarity.
-* Python 3.10 or later +* Python version 3.10 or later🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...view the output](#viewing-the-output) * Python 3.10 or later * [Task] >= 3.38.0 ## Bu...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_OF)
41-41: Convert bare URL to markdown linkReplace the bare URL with a proper markdown link for consistency with the documentation style.
-the address it binds to (usually http://localhost:8080). +the address it binds to (usually `http://localhost:8080`).🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
41-41: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
docs/tasks.yaml (3)
3-8: Consider adding comments to document the purpose of each directory variable.While the variable names are clear, adding comments would help other developers understand:
- The purpose and contents of each directory
- Any cleanup requirements or retention policies
- Dependencies between these directories
vars: # Paths + # Directory containing the built HTML documentation G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/docs/html" + # Python virtual environment for documentation tools G_DOCS_VENV_DIR: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/docs-venv" + # Node.js dependencies for serving documentation G_NODE_DEPS_DIR: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/docs-node"
10-13: Consider making the clean task more robust.The current implementation could be enhanced to:
- Handle non-existent directories gracefully
- Verify successful deletion
- Clean up all documentation-related directories
clean: cmds: - - "rm -rf '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}'" + - | + for dir in "{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}" "{{.G_DOCS_VENV_DIR}}" "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}"; do + if [ -d "$dir" ]; then + rm -rf "$dir" || exit 1 + echo "Cleaned $dir" + fi + done
14-20: Consider adding configuration options for the HTTP server.The current implementation uses hardcoded server settings. Consider adding:
- Configurable port (currently defaults to 8080)
- Configurable host (currently defaults to localhost)
- HTTPS option for testing secure connections
serve: + vars: + HTTP_PORT: "8080" + HTTP_HOST: "localhost" deps: - "http-server" - "site" cmds: - - "npm --prefix '{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}' exec http-server '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}' -c-1" + - "npm --prefix '{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}' exec http-server '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}' -c-1 -p {{.HTTP_PORT}} -a {{.HTTP_HOST}}"docs/src/index.md (2)
1-4: Enhance the introduction and use Canadian spellingConsider these improvements to make the introduction more engaging:
- Add "currently" before "supports" to align with the development status
- Use Canadian spelling: "viewer" should be "viewer" (unchanged)
-The YScope Log Viewer is a tool that can be used to view log files. It currently supports +The YScope Log Viewer is a powerful tool for viewing log files. It currently supports [CLP][clp-repo]'s compressed log files (IR streams) and JSON log files. The viewer can be used to navigate the log file, filter by log level, view the logs with syntax highlighting, and generate direct links to specific log events.
60-67: Enhance the features list organizationConsider organizing the features into categories and providing more context:
- User Interface Improvements
- Infinite scrolling
- Pretty printing
- Analytics & Visualization
- Dashboard for log distribution
- File Support & Processing
- Additional format support
- Browser-side conversion
- Search & Correlation
- Multi-file search
- Timestamp sync
This organization would make it easier for users to understand the development roadmap.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
README.md(1 hunks)docs/README.md(1 hunks)docs/conf/conf.py(1 hunks)docs/requirements.txt(1 hunks)docs/src/_static/custom.css(1 hunks)docs/src/index.md(1 hunks)docs/tasks.yaml(1 hunks)taskfile.yaml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- taskfile.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- README.md
- docs/conf/conf.py
- docs/src/_static/custom.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/README.md
[uncategorized] ~13-~13: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...ignificant increases in the size of repo as we add and update images. * [Node.js...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~15-~15: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...view the output](#viewing-the-output) * Python 3.10 or later * [Task] >= 3.38.0 ## Bu...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_OF)
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
docs/README.md
41-41: null
Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
docs/src/index.md
77-77: Unused link or image reference definition: "bugs-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
82-82: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-requests-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
88-88: Unused link or image reference definition: "zulip-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
docs/requirements.txt (1)
1-6: Verify package versions against reference repositories
Let's ensure consistency with the documentation setups in the referenced repositories.
✅ Verification successful
Package versions are newer than reference repositories
The current package versions are all newer than those in both reference repositories, which is good for security and features. Notable differences:
- myst-parser: >=4.0.0 vs >=2.0.0
- pydata-sphinx-theme: >=0.16.0 vs ==0.14.4 (CLP) and >=0.15.2 (CLP-FFI-PY)
- sphinx: >=8.1.3 vs ==8.0.2 (CLP) and >=7.2.6 (CLP-FFI-PY)
- sphinx_design: >=0.6.1 vs >=0.5.0
- sphinxcontrib-mermaid: >=1.0.0 vs >=0.9.2 (only in CLP)
The versions chosen are appropriate as they:
- Use newer versions than reference repos
- Maintain compatibility with minimum version constraints
- Avoid known issues that required version pinning in CLP
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare package versions with reference repositories
# Clone reference repos
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/y-scope/clp.git /tmp/clp
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/y-scope/clp-ffi-py.git /tmp/clp-ffi-py
# Extract and compare requirements
echo "=== CLP docs requirements ==="
cat /tmp/clp/docs/requirements.txt 2>/dev/null || echo "No requirements.txt found"
echo -e "\n=== CLP-FFI-PY docs requirements ==="
cat /tmp/clp-ffi-py/docs/requirements.txt 2>/dev/null || echo "No requirements.txt found"
# Clean up
rm -rf /tmp/clp /tmp/clp-ffi-py
Length of output: 1065
docs/README.md (3)
18-33: LGTM! Clear and well-structured build instructions.
The build commands section provides clear instructions with appropriate code blocks.
43-46: LGTM! Well-organized reference links.
The links section is properly organized and includes all necessary references.
23-23: Verify Task runner configuration
Let's verify that the Task runner configuration exists and includes the referenced tasks.
Also applies to: 31-31, 37-37
✅ Verification successful
Task runner configuration is properly set up
The Task runner configuration exists and includes all the referenced tasks. The docs/tasks.yaml file contains the required tasks:
docs:site: Builds the documentation using Sphinxdocs:clean: Removes the build directorydocs:serve: Serves the documentation using http-server
The tasks are properly included in the main taskfile.yaml through the includes directive.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Task runner configuration exists and contains required tasks
# Check if Taskfile exists and contains the required tasks
rg -A 5 'docs:(site|clean|serve)' Taskfile.yml
Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any task runner configuration files with different extensions or locations
fd -e yaml -e yml -e toml -e json -e js task -i
# Also search for any documentation about task runner setup
fd -g "*README*" -X grep -l -i "task" {} \;
# Search for task runner related commands in package.json if it exists
fd "package.json" -X jq -r '.scripts | select(. != null)'
Length of output: 870
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check contents of both task configuration files
cat docs/tasks.yaml taskfile.yaml
# Specifically look for docs:site task
rg -A 5 'docs:(site|clean|serve)' docs/tasks.yaml taskfile.yaml
Length of output: 3594
docs/tasks.yaml (1)
21-61: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance site build robustness and performance.
The site build task could be improved in several areas:
- Add timeout to the broken link checker to prevent hanging
- Enable parallel builds for faster documentation generation
- Consider adding a flag to optionally treat warnings as errors
Let's verify the broken link checker script:
site:
vars:
CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5"
OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}"
+ SPHINX_WORKERS: "auto" # Number of parallel workers
+ LINK_CHECK_TIMEOUT: "30" # Seconds
dir: "{{.TASKFILE_DIR}}"
deps:
- ":init"
- task: ":utils:validate-checksum"
vars:
CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"
DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}"
- "docs-venv"
cmds:
- task: "clean"
- - "python3 '{{.ROOT_DIR}}/tools/scripts/find-broken-docs-links.py'"
+ - "timeout {{.LINK_CHECK_TIMEOUT}} python3 '{{.ROOT_DIR}}/tools/scripts/find-broken-docs-links.py'"
- |-
. "{{.G_DOCS_VENV_DIR}}/bin/activate"
sphinx-build \
--write-all \
--fresh-env \
--conf-dir conf \
--nitpicky \
--fail-on-warning \
--keep-going \
+ -j {{.SPHINX_WORKERS}} \
--builder html \
src "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}"docs/src/index.md (3)
77-77: Remove unused shield references
The following shield references are defined but not used in the document:
bugs-shieldfeature-requests-shieldzulip-shield
Consider removing these unused references to maintain clean documentation.
Also applies to: 82-82, 88-88
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
77-77: Unused link or image reference definition: "bugs-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
35-42: Enhance the online demo section with more detailed instructions
Consider adding:
- Expected file formats and size limitations
- Step-by-step instructions for common operations
- Screenshots or GIFs demonstrating the interface
Also, ensure the Zenodo dataset URL format is consistent with the updated format (records vs. record).
76-87: Verify external resource accessibility
Let's verify that all external resources are accessible:
✅ Verification successful
All external links are accessible and valid
All the external links in the documentation are accessible and return successful HTTP responses (200 OK), including:
- GitHub repositories and issue templates
- Documentation pages
- Online demo page
- Community chat
The only expected redirect (302) is for the bug report template, which requires authentication to create new issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify external resources accessibility
# Check if the URLs are accessible
for url in \
"https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/clp-loglib-py" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/clp" \
"https://docs.yscope.com/clp/main/user-guide/resources-datasets" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/log4j1-appenders" \
"https://github.com/y-scope/logback-appenders" \
"https://y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/"; do
echo "Checking $url"
curl -I "$url"
done
Length of output: 30831
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
77-77: Unused link or image reference definition: "bugs-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
82-82: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-requests-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
docs/tasks.yaml
Outdated
| docs-venv: | ||
| internal: true | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | ||
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_DOCS_VENV_DIR}}" | ||
| REQUIREMENTS_FILE: "docs/requirements.txt" | ||
| deps: | ||
| - ":init" | ||
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| cmds: | ||
| - task: ":utils:create-venv" | ||
| vars: | ||
| LABEL: "docs" | ||
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| REQUIREMENTS_FILE: "{{.REQUIREMENTS_FILE}}" | ||
| # This command must be last | ||
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| sources: | ||
| - "{{.REQUIREMENTS_FILE}}" | ||
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/taskfile.yaml" | ||
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | ||
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Pin dependency versions in docs/requirements.txt for reproducible builds
All dependencies in the requirements file are using >= version specifiers, which can lead to inconsistent builds and potential compatibility issues. Pin exact versions to ensure reproducible documentation builds.
Current unpinned dependencies:
- myst-parser>=4.0.0
- pydata-sphinx-theme>=0.16.0
- sphinx_design>=0.6.1
- sphinx-copybutton>=0.5.2
- sphinx>=8.1.3
- sphinxcontrib-mermaid>=1.0.0
Replace >= with == for each dependency after verifying the latest stable versions that work together.
🔗 Analysis chain
Add requirements validation to the virtual environment setup.
Consider adding checks to:
- Verify all dependencies have pinned versions
- Validate requirements file format
- Check for known security vulnerabilities
Let's verify the requirements file:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all dependencies have pinned versions
if [ -f docs/requirements.txt ]; then
echo "Checking for unpinned dependencies..."
grep -v '^[a-zA-Z0-9].*==' docs/requirements.txt || true
fi
Length of output: 306
| http-server: | ||
| internal: true | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | ||
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}" | ||
| deps: | ||
| - ":init" | ||
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| cmds: | ||
| - "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'" | ||
| - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server" | ||
| # This command must be last | ||
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| sources: | ||
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/taskfile.yaml" | ||
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | ||
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Pin http-server version and add security considerations.
The current implementation installs the latest version of http-server, which could lead to inconsistent behaviour. Consider:
- Pinning the http-server version
- Adding security headers for local development
http-server:
internal: true
vars:
CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5"
OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}"
+ HTTP_SERVER_VERSION: "14.1.1" # Pin to specific version
deps:
- ":init"
- task: ":utils:validate-checksum"
vars:
CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"
DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}"
cmds:
- "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'"
- - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server"
+ - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server@{{.HTTP_SERVER_VERSION}}"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| http-server: | |
| internal: true | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | |
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}" | |
| deps: | |
| - ":init" | |
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| cmds: | |
| - "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'" | |
| - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server" | |
| # This command must be last | |
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| sources: | |
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/taskfile.yaml" | |
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | |
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] | |
| http-server: | |
| internal: true | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | |
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}" | |
| HTTP_SERVER_VERSION: "14.1.1" # Pin to specific version | |
| deps: | |
| - ":init" | |
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| cmds: | |
| - "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'" | |
| - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server@{{.HTTP_SERVER_VERSION}}" | |
| # This command must be last | |
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | |
| vars: | |
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | |
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | |
| sources: | |
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/taskfile.yaml" | |
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | |
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/tasks.yaml (2)
17-22: Add security headers for local development server.While this is a development server, consider adding basic security headers:
- - "npm --prefix '{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}' exec http-server '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}' -c-1" + - "npm --prefix '{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}' exec http-server '{{.G_DOCS_BUILD_DIR}}' -c-1 --cors --no-dotfiles --proxy http://localhost:8080?"
24-63: Consider enabling parallel builds for better performance.The Sphinx build configuration is comprehensive, but could benefit from parallel processing for faster builds.
sphinx-build \ --write-all \ --fresh-env \ + -j auto \ --conf-dir conf \ --nitpicky \
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/tasks.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/tasks.yaml (2)
1-11: LGTM! Well-structured variable definitions.
The version specification and variable definitions are clear, consistent, and well-organized.
13-15: LGTM! Clean and safe implementation.
The clean task safely removes the build directory using proper path quoting.
| docs-venv: | ||
| internal: true | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_DOCS_VENV_CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_DOCS_VENV_DIR}}" | ||
| REQUIREMENTS_FILE: "docs/requirements.txt" | ||
| deps: | ||
| - ":init" | ||
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| cmds: | ||
| - task: ":utils:create-venv" | ||
| vars: | ||
| LABEL: "docs" | ||
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| REQUIREMENTS_FILE: "{{.REQUIREMENTS_FILE}}" | ||
| # This command must be last | ||
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| sources: | ||
| - "{{.REQUIREMENTS_FILE}}" | ||
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/taskfile.yaml" | ||
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | ||
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] | ||
|
|
||
| http-server: | ||
| internal: true | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.G_BUILD_DIR}}/{{.TASK | replace \":\" \"#\"}}.md5" | ||
| OUTPUT_DIR: "{{.G_NODE_DEPS_DIR}}" | ||
| deps: | ||
| - ":init" | ||
| - task: ":utils:validate-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| CHECKSUM_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| cmds: | ||
| - "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'" | ||
| - "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server" | ||
| # This command must be last | ||
| - task: ":utils:compute-checksum" | ||
| vars: | ||
| DATA_DIR: "{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}" | ||
| OUTPUT_FILE: "{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}" | ||
| sources: | ||
| - "{{.ROOT_DIR}}/taskfile.yaml" | ||
| - "{{.TASKFILE}}" | ||
| generates: ["{{.CHECKSUM_FILE}}"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for dependency installation failures.
Both tasks should handle potential installation failures gracefully.
docs-venv:
# ... existing configuration ...
cmds:
+ - |
+ if ! task ":utils:create-venv" vars="{...}"; then
+ echo "Failed to create virtual environment. Please check your Python installation."
+ exit 1
+ fi
- task: ":utils:create-venv"Similar error handling should be added to the http-server task:
http-server:
# ... existing configuration ...
cmds:
- "rm -rf '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}'"
+ - |
+ if ! npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server; then
+ echo "Failed to install http-server. Please check your npm installation."
+ exit 1
+ fi
- "npm --prefix '{{.OUTPUT_DIR}}' install http-server"Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
docs/src/.gitattributes
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/src/index.md (3)
1-4: Consider enhancing the introduction with specific log level examplesThe introduction could be more informative by providing examples of supported log levels (e.g., INFO, ERROR, WARN).
The YScope Log Viewer is a tool that can be used to view log files. It currently supports [CLP][clp-repo]'s compressed log files (IR streams) and JSON log files. The viewer can be used to -navigate the log file, filter by log level, view the logs with syntax highlighting, and generate +navigate the log file, filter by log level (e.g., INFO, ERROR, WARN), view the logs with syntax highlighting, and generate direct links to specific log events.
45-51: Consider adding version compatibility informationIt would be helpful to specify the supported versions for each logging library.
60-68: Consider adding feature prioritization or timeline informationThe features list would be more informative with rough timelines or priority levels for each item.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md(1 hunks)docs/src/index.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
README.md
46-46: Unused link or image reference definition: "docs-site/building"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
docs/src/index.md
77-77: Unused link or image reference definition: "bugs-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
82-82: Unused link or image reference definition: "feature-requests-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
88-88: Unused link or image reference definition: "zulip-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
README.md (4)
7-10: LGTM! Clear and concise introduction.
The introduction effectively communicates the tool's purpose and key features.
15-17: LGTM! Clear references to feedback and documentation.
The section effectively directs users to relevant resources.
19-25: LGTM! Well-structured demo section.
The demo section provides clear instructions and useful context about the sample data.
27-39: LGTM! Clear and concise sections.
The documentation, feedback, and contributing sections effectively direct users to the appropriate resources.
docs/src/index.md (2)
17-33: Well-structured guide navigation
The grid layout effectively organizes the user and developer guides, making it easy for visitors to find relevant documentation.
37-42: Verify demo accessibility
Let's ensure the demo link and sample log file are accessible.
✅ Verification successful
Demo and sample log file are accessible
Both the online demo at y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/ and the sample log file in S3 are accessible with HTTP 200 responses, confirming proper functionality of the demo section links.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify demo accessibility
# Check if the demo URL and sample log file are accessible
curl -I "https://y-scope.github.io/yscope-log-viewer/"
curl -I "https://yscope.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/sample-logs/yarn-ubuntu-resourcemanager-ip-172-31-17-135.log.1.clp.zst"
Length of output: 2005
| See the [demo](#demo) section to try the log viewer on a sample log file. Or you can generate your | ||
| own compressed log files using one of our [libraries][docs-site/generating-ir-stream-logs]. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Documentation link is broken and needs to be updated
The link to the documentation for generating IR stream logs is not accessible. While the link definition exists in the README.md file, the URL returns a 404 error. Please verify the correct documentation URL structure and update accordingly.
- The current broken link definition in README.md:
[docs-site/generating-ir-stream-logs]: https://docs.yscope.com/yscope-log-viewer/main/index#generating-ir-stream-logs
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the accessibility of the new documentation links.
The link to [docs-site/generating-ir-stream-logs] is using the new documentation site structure.
Let me check if there are any other documentation links defined in the repository that might help us understand the correct URL structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accessibility of the new documentation links
# Expected result: HTTP 200 status code
curl -sI "https://docs.yscope.com/yscope-log-viewer/main/index#generating-ir-stream-logs" | head -n1
Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation links in markdown files
rg "\[.*?\]\[.*?\]|\[.*?\]\(.*?docs.*?\)" --type md
# Also check if there's a reference-style link definition for the docs-site
rg "^\[docs-site.*?\]:" --type md
Length of output: 3277
docs/src/index.md
Outdated
| ::: | ||
|
|
||
| [bug-report]: https://github.com/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/issues/new?labels=bug&template=bug-report.yml | ||
| [bugs-shield]: https://img.shields.io/github/issues/y-scope/yscope-log-viewer/bug?label=bugs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused shield references
The following shield references are defined but not used in the document:
bugs-shieldfeature-requests-shieldzulip-shield
Consider either removing these unused references or incorporating them into the document where appropriate.
Also applies to: 82-82, 88-88
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
77-77: Unused link or image reference definition: "bugs-shield"
Link and image reference definitions should be needed
(MD053, link-image-reference-definitions)
junhaoliao
changed the title
Description
This PR sets up docs site infra as done in https://github.com/y-scope/clp/tree/main/docs and https://github.com/y-scope/clp-ffi-py/tree/main/docs .
TODO
Validation performed
task docs:serveand observed the debug server started which serves the static site locally at http://127.0.0.1:8080 .Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes
Chores