Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Temporarily use Dask version constraint in CI #34

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 19, 2021

Conversation

jrbourbeau
Copy link
Contributor

This is one way to enable CI to start passing again in light of #27. Another option would have been to explicitly xfail test_histogram_shape when using dask=2021.3.0. The approach here seems a little simpler to me, but I'm happy to update to something else if others prefer.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 18, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #34 (965960a) into master (9992eba) will increase coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 97.14%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #34      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.24%   94.41%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines         226      215      -11     
  Branches       65       58       -7     
==========================================
- Hits          213      203      -10     
  Misses          8        8              
+ Partials        5        4       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
xhistogram/core.py 98.49% <93.33%> (ø)
xhistogram/duck_array_ops.py 78.26% <100.00%> (-2.39%) ⬇️
xhistogram/xarray.py 91.52% <100.00%> (-0.42%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c2ff727...965960a. Read the comment docs.

@rabernat
Copy link
Contributor

This is great @jrbourbeau. Thanks so much for all your help around here!

@jrbourbeau
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, no problem. Happy to help out where I can

@rabernat rabernat merged commit 2c221ed into xgcm:master Mar 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants